About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, March 27th, 11:46AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Southern Cross risks losing clearance to buy Aetna

The Commerce Commission is investigating a recent deal done by Southern Cross.

Tuesday, March 6th 2001, 9:42PM

by Philip Macalister

Southern Cross has drawn the wrath of one of its competitors and has attracted scrutiny from the Commerce Commission over its handling of a tender for Bank of New Zealand's staff health insurance business.

At issue is whether Southern Cross breached a set of conditions the commission put on it relating to its acquisition of Aetna Health.

Southern Cross, New Zealand's largest health insurer, originally applied to the commission last year for permission to buy its closest rival Aetna.

The commission turned it down twice, but finally granted clearance earlier this year subject to a number of conditions.

One of those was that it would sell all of Aetna's 40,000 policies due to concerns over market dominance.

Another was that the two businesses would be kept separate until the divestment were complete.

However, Southern Cross has picked up the BNZ that is one of Aetna's prime customers.

Tower Health managing director Jim Minto says his company was not invited to participate in the BNZ tender and he is questioning how it was run.

Commission spokesman Vince Cholewa has confirmed the matter has been brought to the commission's attention and it is looking into it.

He says the commission has sought information from Southern Cross on the deal as part of its investigation.

"The commission cleared Southern Cross to acquire Aetna subject to a series of undertakings," he says.

"If the undertakings are not adhered to the clearance is longer valid."

Meanwhile, Southern Cross has applied to the High Court in Auckland to overturn the commission's earlier two decisions which stopped it buying Aetna. It now wants to keep hold of the business including the 40,000 policies the commission has told it to sell.

The case was heard in January and a decision is due soon.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« HFA wants incentives for health insuranceHIH collapse grim warning for privatised ACC insurance »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Strategy Thoughts
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Clients complain about adviser fees
    “All quite good comments really. The issue about not getting paid is clear communication/disclosure to clients. How do you...”
    2 hours ago by gavin austin adviser business compliance
  • Trauma problematic, Fidelity boss says
    “New product? This seems nothing more than the old Lifecare product Fidelity has had for ages, just now available on a standalone...”
    5 hours ago by Tash
  • What is the value of CPD?
    “Even though I was waiting for it, I still get heartily sick of assertions that pension funds are the only way, and nobody...”
    9 hours ago by Dirty Harry
  • Watch out for the newly promoted income protection client
    “The design aspect cuts both ways, presently it usually works in favour of the client as they often have a drop off in income...”
    9 hours ago by RiskAdviser
  • Unfair terms rules kick in
    “For the majority of life insurance contracts there has been a level of change protection for consumers since the 1908 with...”
    10 hours ago by RiskAdviser
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by PHP Developer and eyelovedesign.com