About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, March 27th, 11:10AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Southern Cross risks losing clearance to buy Aetna

The Commerce Commission is investigating a recent deal done by Southern Cross.

Tuesday, March 6th 2001, 9:42PM

by Philip Macalister

Southern Cross has drawn the wrath of one of its competitors and has attracted scrutiny from the Commerce Commission over its handling of a tender for Bank of New Zealand's staff health insurance business.

At issue is whether Southern Cross breached a set of conditions the commission put on it relating to its acquisition of Aetna Health.

Southern Cross, New Zealand's largest health insurer, originally applied to the commission last year for permission to buy its closest rival Aetna.

The commission turned it down twice, but finally granted clearance earlier this year subject to a number of conditions.

One of those was that it would sell all of Aetna's 40,000 policies due to concerns over market dominance.

Another was that the two businesses would be kept separate until the divestment were complete.

However, Southern Cross has picked up the BNZ that is one of Aetna's prime customers.

Tower Health managing director Jim Minto says his company was not invited to participate in the BNZ tender and he is questioning how it was run.

Commission spokesman Vince Cholewa has confirmed the matter has been brought to the commission's attention and it is looking into it.

He says the commission has sought information from Southern Cross on the deal as part of its investigation.

"The commission cleared Southern Cross to acquire Aetna subject to a series of undertakings," he says.

"If the undertakings are not adhered to the clearance is longer valid."

Meanwhile, Southern Cross has applied to the High Court in Auckland to overturn the commission's earlier two decisions which stopped it buying Aetna. It now wants to keep hold of the business including the 40,000 policies the commission has told it to sell.

The case was heard in January and a decision is due soon.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« HFA wants incentives for health insuranceHIH collapse grim warning for privatised ACC insurance »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Strategy Thoughts
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “So let me get this right. To be a true insurance adviser I should have an agency with every insurance company (that is if...”
    21 hours ago by Robalan
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “Those with a legal bent will lick their lips, rub their hands and go "ohboyohboyohbioy" when surveying the feedback document....”
    2 days ago by Denis
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “We know that you can't turn a sows ear into a purse, the whole debate about the lipstick is irrelevant. Regulate what...”
    2 days ago by RiskAdviser
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “mbie/fma FAR vs advisers' choice. let's toss the coin and see which is better - head i win, tail you lose. ...”
    3 days ago by w k
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “A+ to Dirty Harry above; I couldn't agree more. At the risk of boring you other contributors with repetition - FGS STOP...”
    3 days ago by Murray Weatherston
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com