About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, November 26th, 10:47PM
Latest Headlines

Southern Cross risks losing clearance to buy Aetna

The Commerce Commission is investigating a recent deal done by Southern Cross.

Tuesday, March 6th 2001, 9:42PM

by Philip Macalister

Southern Cross has drawn the wrath of one of its competitors and has attracted scrutiny from the Commerce Commission over its handling of a tender for Bank of New Zealand's staff health insurance business.

At issue is whether Southern Cross breached a set of conditions the commission put on it relating to its acquisition of Aetna Health.

Southern Cross, New Zealand's largest health insurer, originally applied to the commission last year for permission to buy its closest rival Aetna.

The commission turned it down twice, but finally granted clearance earlier this year subject to a number of conditions.

One of those was that it would sell all of Aetna's 40,000 policies due to concerns over market dominance.

Another was that the two businesses would be kept separate until the divestment were complete.

However, Southern Cross has picked up the BNZ that is one of Aetna's prime customers.

Tower Health managing director Jim Minto says his company was not invited to participate in the BNZ tender and he is questioning how it was run.

Commission spokesman Vince Cholewa has confirmed the matter has been brought to the commission's attention and it is looking into it.

He says the commission has sought information from Southern Cross on the deal as part of its investigation.

"The commission cleared Southern Cross to acquire Aetna subject to a series of undertakings," he says.

"If the undertakings are not adhered to the clearance is longer valid."

Meanwhile, Southern Cross has applied to the High Court in Auckland to overturn the commission's earlier two decisions which stopped it buying Aetna. It now wants to keep hold of the business including the 40,000 policies the commission has told it to sell.

The case was heard in January and a decision is due soon.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« HFA wants incentives for health insuranceHIH collapse grim warning for privatised ACC insurance »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Strategy Thoughts
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • MJW missed their chance
    “Let me summarise the argument: MJW (and banks): Commission paid to non-tied advisors is too high. Advisors: If MJW...”
    18 hours ago by b p
  • RFA standards set to lift
    “The other elephant in the room is the QFE's and their advisers (be they AFA'a or staff) (mis-)selling their products and...”
    19 hours ago by R1
  • MJW missed their chance
    “Excellent comments Michael Naylor. I often agree with your insights and analysis, although do hold different views occasionally...”
    1 day ago by Tony Vidler
  • MJW report scores a D
    “Justalifeinsurancesalesman this is the type of detail the Minister would like to see. If you add some further details to...”
    2 days ago by AdviserMan
  • RFA standards set to lift
    “I do not want to hear anything Neilson might say, until the FSC takes a position on the MJW report. Quite frankly he...”
    2 days ago by Dirty Harry
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News


Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com