About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, July 6th, 11:09AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Southern Cross risks losing clearance to buy Aetna

The Commerce Commission is investigating a recent deal done by Southern Cross.

Tuesday, March 6th 2001, 9:42PM

by Philip Macalister

Southern Cross has drawn the wrath of one of its competitors and has attracted scrutiny from the Commerce Commission over its handling of a tender for Bank of New Zealand's staff health insurance business.

At issue is whether Southern Cross breached a set of conditions the commission put on it relating to its acquisition of Aetna Health.

Southern Cross, New Zealand's largest health insurer, originally applied to the commission last year for permission to buy its closest rival Aetna.

The commission turned it down twice, but finally granted clearance earlier this year subject to a number of conditions.

One of those was that it would sell all of Aetna's 40,000 policies due to concerns over market dominance.

Another was that the two businesses would be kept separate until the divestment were complete.

However, Southern Cross has picked up the BNZ that is one of Aetna's prime customers.

Tower Health managing director Jim Minto says his company was not invited to participate in the BNZ tender and he is questioning how it was run.

Commission spokesman Vince Cholewa has confirmed the matter has been brought to the commission's attention and it is looking into it.

He says the commission has sought information from Southern Cross on the deal as part of its investigation.

"The commission cleared Southern Cross to acquire Aetna subject to a series of undertakings," he says.

"If the undertakings are not adhered to the clearance is longer valid."

Meanwhile, Southern Cross has applied to the High Court in Auckland to overturn the commission's earlier two decisions which stopped it buying Aetna. It now wants to keep hold of the business including the 40,000 policies the commission has told it to sell.

The case was heard in January and a decision is due soon.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« HFA wants incentives for health insuranceHIH collapse grim warning for privatised ACC insurance »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Strategy Thoughts
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • FMA targets investor knowledge
    “I’m getting tired of FMA making negative comments about financial advisers. Financial advisers are the key to assisting...”
    60 minutes ago by Charity
  • QROPS now trapped in KiwiSaver funds
    “If KiwiSaver schemes have allowed withdrawals for first home purchase and financial hardship contrary to QROPS regulations...”
    2 hours ago by Admin
  • Dealer groups should be QFEs
    “I am happy to concede that the wider definition of wayward may have offended some readers. I apologies if that is the case. My...”
    2 days ago by Jeff Page
  • Is the FMA looking in right places?
    “The real joke is how when large players in the market manage to get the regulator to look away, or to undertake a 'enforceable...”
    3 days ago by Chatterbox
  • Dealer groups should be QFEs
    “The term ‘dealer group’ appears to be loosely used in this discussion. Whilst it’s true that Australian Dealer Groups...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com