About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, October 7th, 9:48PM
Investment News

Securities Commission report on advisers

Read (or download) the full Securities Commission discussion document here.

Tuesday, August 28th 2001, 11:38AM


Investment advisers are important. They help people decide who to invest with and how to select investment products that best suit their needs. The law about investment advisers is important. We consider it timely to review this law. This paper raises questions, makes proposals for reform and invites comment.

Investment adviser law is chiefly derived from the Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act 1996 but also comes from the Securities Act 1978, the Crimes Act 1961, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, the Fair Trading Act 1986, common law and equity. The effects of each of these are discussed in this paper.

This summary outlines the major proposals canvassed. For a full list of questions see page 54.

The Principle of Disclosure
The principle of disclosure is central to New Zealand securities law. The Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act's purpose is consistent with that principle. It aims to ensure that people have sufficient information about advisers available to them to be able to make informed decisions as to whether to ask for investment advice and whether to rely on advice received.

Proposals canvassed in this paper

A Replacing the present two-tier disclosure regime with the requirement for a single disclosure document to be given to clients before investment advice is given.

The Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act provides a two-tier disclosure regime with a distinction between initial disclosure and request disclosure. The investor will not receive all information about an investment adviser prescribed under the Act unless he or she requests it. Many people are unaware of their right to request investment adviser disclosure. Accordingly a client may make a decision about whether to engage an investment adviser and whether to act on his or her advice without having all relevant information. This could, for example, result in a client treating someone with limited qualifications and experience as more knowledgeable than they are.

The investment adviser may have two functions, to advise clients on investment products and to market investment products for issuers. Both these functions are important. However placing both functions in one person can create conflicts of interest. Often a significant portion of an investment adviser's remuneration is from commissions provided by issuers of investment products. This economic interest may conflict directly with a client's interest in making an investment that results in the outcomes that he or she is looking for. The client may not be aware of this.

Proposals for reform
We propose for consideration that the information in both tiers of disclosure should be disclosed to an investor before investment advice is given. We propose that an investment adviser should not be free to give investment advice to a client until disclosure has been made.

We are also reviewing the content of the investment adviser disclosure document. We think it is important that a client of an investment adviser has all information relevant to making a decision whether to engage an investment adviser and whether to rely on advice. The Australians prescribe some content to their investment adviser disclosure documents from which we may want to borrow.

B Reviewing the exclusions from the definition of investment adviser

The definition of investment adviser in the Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act excludes the issuers and promoters of securities to which the investment advice applies. It would appear also to exclude employees of issuers or promoters. In addition it excludes persons who only transmit investment advice relating to particular securities given by the issuer or promoter.

Proposals for reform
We raise for consideration whether these exclusions from the Act are appropriate.

C All material benefits to be disclosed

A concern has been expressed that the present requirements to disclose may be too limiting and that other material benefits for example trailing commissions or last resort financing facilities may not be sufficiently clearly covered or may be outside the disclosure requirements.

Proposal for reform
We propose for consideration a more general obligation to disclose all material benefits. We propose that the term "reasonably likely to influence" also be re-assessed.

Making the Recommendation of Illegal Offers of Securities an Offence

Illegal offers are a significant problem. These are often fraudulent. Often they originate from overseas. It is difficult to impose discipline on the overseas issuers. Sometimes these offers are made through New Zealanders, acting as investment advisers. If an offer of securities does not comply with the law an investor may be dealing with an incompetent or dishonest adviser and an incompetent or dishonest issuer.

Proposals for reform
We propose for consideration that it should be an offence for an adviser to recommend illegal investment products unless the adviser did not know that the offer documents did not comply with the law, or that the illegality of the offer of securities was in respect of immaterial matters.

Strengthening the Enforcement of Investment Adviser Law

The law relating to enforcement, in regard to investment advisers, is important. Clients place their trust in the honesty and ability of investment advisers. They apprehend that the law will be enforced when it should be. Because of the position investment advisers hold in the community and the wider economy, it is important that enforcement action can be taken where necessary.

Currently civil actions can be taken by disadvantaged investors seeking redress against an investment adviser who has not complied with the law or who has made misleading statements. However often it is not practical for an investor to take such action.

The existing law does not clearly identify a single regulatory body as responsible for enforcement in regard to investment advisers. We consider there should be specific provision for the Commission to take or recommend enforcement action where necessary.

Proposals for reform
We propose for consideration that the Commission have the power to:

  • Suspend and prohibit investment adviser disclosure statements where it is of the opinion that the disclosure statement does not comply with the Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act.
  • Prohibit an advertisement of an investment adviser where it is of the opinion that it is likely to deceive, mislead or confuse.
  • Apply for injunctions under the Investment Advisers (Disclosure) Act to restrain a person from contravening the Act, to order disclosure of information and to prohibit the giving of investment advice or the receiving of investment property.
  • Prohibit an investment adviser from giving investment advice. A prohibition could be made in respect of any particular product, in respect of the products of any issuer and associated parties, or in respect of giving investment advice generally. This would allow the Commission to act swiftly where it detects rogue investment advisers. Any such action taken by the Commission would be subject to review by the Courts in accordance with the existing law.

This is the Executive Summary of the Securities Commission's discussion document on Investment Advisers.
The full discussion paper can be viewed as a word document here

To download this document onto your hard drive right click here and choose "Save Target As"

« Practice Management: One-to-One MarketingKing builds an empire »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend

Good Returns Investment Centre is bought to you by:

Subscribe Now

Keep up to date with the latest investment news
Subscribe to our newsletter today

Edison Investment Research
  • HarbourVest Global Private Equity
    6 October 2015
    Disciplined, diversified approach to private equity
    Judging by prevailing discounts to net assets, broad fund of fund investors in private equity are not a particularly favoured group within the investment...
  • Tiso Blackstar Group
    5 October 2015
    Seasoned African investor at a wide discount
    Tiso Blackstar Group (TBGR) is an Africa-focused, London-quoted investment company with a 10-year track record of investing in sub-Saharan Africa. The...
  • Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust
    5 October 2015
    Realisations in prospect
    Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust (DNE) is a private equity investment specialist differentiated from peers by its focus on UK lower mid-market buyouts....
  • Standard Life Equity Income Trust
    1 October 2015
    Multi-cap portfolio building a strong record
    Standard Life Equity Income Trust (SLET) follows an unconstrained approach to seeking above-average income with real capital and income growth potential....
  • Is Private Equity
    29 September 2015
    Facing economic headwinds
    ISGSY targets capital appreciation and eventual realisation gains from its Turkish private equity investments, meanwhile seeking to pay attractive dividends....
  • Deutsche Beteiligungs
    28 September 2015
    New investments at highest level in 10 years
    Deutsche Beteiligungs (DBAG) achieved its FY15 financial targets during Q315, although recent market volatility and lower market valuation levels have...
© 2015 Edison Investment Research.

View more research papers »

Today's Best Bank Rates
Heartland Bank 3.60  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
Cash PIE Rates

Cash Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ 1.90    1.96    2.05
ASB Bank 1.90    1.96    2.05
ASB Bank 2.10    2.18    2.27
ASB Bank 2.15    2.23    2.33
ASB Bank 2.20    2.28    2.38
ASB Bank 2.25    2.33    2.45
BNZ 2.30    2.38    2.49
Direct Broking Call Account 2.80    2.92    3.05
Heartland Bank 3.10    3.17    3.32
Kiwibank 2.40    2.50    2.61
Kiwibank 3.15    3.29    3.44
Nelson Building Society 3.75    3.90    4.08
RaboDirect 2.50    2.60    2.71
SBS Bank 2.50    2.59    2.70
TSB Bank 3.00    3.12    3.27
Westpac 2.20    2.28    2.38
Westpac 0.10    0.10    0.11
Westpac 3.35    3.49    3.65

Term Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ Term Fund - 90 days 2.90    3.01    3.14
ANZ Term fund - 12 months 3.50    3.64    3.80
ANZ Term Fund - 120 days 3.20    3.29    3.45
ANZ Term fund - 6 months 3.35    3.48    3.64
ANZ Term Fund - 150 days 3.30    3.39    3.55
ANZ Term Fund - 9 months 3.40    3.53    3.69
ANZ Term Fund - 18 months 3.50    3.60    3.76
ANZ Term Fund - 2 years 3.55    3.70    3.86
ANZ Term Fund - 5 years 3.70    3.86    4.04
ASB Bank Term Fund - 90 days 3.10    3.17    3.32
ASB Bank Term Fund - 6 months 3.55    3.65    3.81
ASB Bank Term Fund - 12 months 3.70    3.86    4.04
ASB Bank Term Fund - 18 months 3.85    4.02    4.20
ASB Bank Term Fund - 2 years 3.90    4.08    4.26
ASB Bank Term Fund - 5 years 4.05    4.23    4.42
ASB Bank Term Fund - 9 months 3.65    3.81    3.98
BNZ Term PIE - 120 days 3.20    3.29    3.43
BNZ Term PIE - 150 days 3.20    3.29    3.43
BNZ Term PIE - 5 years 4.00    4.17    4.36
BNZ Term PIE - 2 years 3.75    3.85    4.02
BNZ Term PIE - 18 months 3.70    3.79    3.96
BNZ Term PIE - 12 months 3.65    3.81    3.98
BNZ Term PIE - 9 months 3.55    3.65    3.81
BNZ Term PIE - 6 months 3.50    3.58    3.75
BNZ Term PIE - 90 days 2.90    2.97    3.10
Co-operative Bank PIE Term Fund - 6 months 4.00    4.11    4.30
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 12 months 3.70    3.79    3.96
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 90 days 3.30    3.38    3.53
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 6 months 3.75    3.85    4.02
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 12 months 4.10    4.20    4.41
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 150 days 3.60    3.70    3.86
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 120 days 3.30    3.38    3.53
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 12 months 3.70    3.81    3.98
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 6 months 3.60    3.70    3.87
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 90 days 3.05    3.14    3.28
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 150 days 3.40    3.49    3.65
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 120 days 3.05    3.13    3.27
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 18 months 3.80    3.90    4.08
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 12 months 3.70    3.79    3.96
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 6 months 3.55    3.65    3.81
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 9 months 3.60    3.70    3.86
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 90 days 3.05    3.13    3.27
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 2 years 3.85    3.96    4.13
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com