KiwiSaver popularity brings attention to 'second-order' problems
Former deputy prime minister and finance minister Sir Michael Cullen says the need for an annuity provider to help KiwiSaver members manage their lump sums on retirement is another sign of the scheme’s success.
Tuesday, February 21st 2017, 5:59AM
by Susan Edmunds
He recently joined the board of the Retirement Income Group (RIG).
RIG manages New Zealand’s only variable annuity, Lifetime Retirement Income.
Sir Michael said annuity providers had not made much cut-through in New Zealand and the products that had been available to New Zealanders were not seen as attractive.
But he said as the KiwiSaver balances built up it raised issues about what options would be available to members at retirement. “Being capital rich in retirement is not much use if you are not able to live off it,” he said.
He said Lifetime seemed to offer a viable option for the long-term.
Sir Michael said, when KiwiSaver was first developed, it had not been predicted that such large numbers of New Zealanders would join.
“The success of KiwiSaver has made these second or third-order issues more important. [Another is] are we bringing fees down quickly enough.”
New Zealand was well positioned for an income product, he said.
He said Australia was pondering the problem of a retirement benefit that was heavily income and asset-tested and a compulsory savings scheme had was lump sum orientated, which gave people the incentive to blow their lump sums so they could qualify for the pension.
“New Zealand Super is not asset tested so we don’t face that incentive for misaligned behaviour,” he said.
KiwiSaver was not the only scheme that was likely to deliver lump sums that would need to be manged, he said.
People who had joined the Government Superannuation Fund in the 1980s would start to retire over the next decades and could need help managing that money, he said.
Sir Michael said Lifetime was a good option because people who withdrew their money early could still access any remaining capital without penalty, and a guarantee would cover longevity risk.
|« Simplicity's growth fund posts early success||Low-cost model better for advisers: Simplicity »|
Comments from our readers
No comments yet
Sign In to add your comment
|Printable version||Email to a friend|