Royal and Sun Alliance's success in picking up the funds management and life business of Norwich Union in New Zealand shows the company is determined to be a major player within the financial services industry.Grow or go
Norwich's decision to exit the fund management and risk business in New Zealand illustrates how tough the market is.
According to a February 1997 Standards and Poors report Norwich was keen to improve its market position and "will actively consider suitable acquisitions as opportunities arise."
Chairman David Gascoigne says the company had looked at acquisitions, however never consummated any deals because of differences of opinions in pricing.
"Sometimes our view of price has not been shared by others."
Norwich had a strong balance sheet structure and an excellent solvency and capital position, plus a supportive and respected parent company in the United Kingdom, however its size and lack of critical mass made it vulnerable to competitive pressures.
Its strategy was to build a range of products for a target client-type and use a two-pronged distribution strategy.
The target client was an individual, more than 30 years old with a household income of more than $50,000 who requires risk and investment products, who prefers to deal with an intermediary.
Norwich also chose to embrace the independent advisory community as well as its tied agents, for distribution plus it had a strategy of cross-selling to State Insurance clients.
The success of this strategy is probably best measured by the numbers.
Norwich Union Investments was established in 1994 to sell unit trusts. At the time of sale it had about $40 million under management, and it was not expected to generate a profit until the end of 2000.
On the distribution side Norwich had some major and expensive problems which all impacted directly on the bottom-line.
Commissions paid to the "independent" advisory community ballooned out substantially and they were inflated by the practices of several planners.
Standards and Poors say commission almost tripled to $8 million in 1995 partly due to problems Norwich had with two brokers. As a result Norwich, that year, had a very high ratio of expenses to premiums (70.7 per cent).
Gascoigne was unwilling to comment on how successful Norwich's strategies were. He says the New Zealand market is characterised by the number of small players and that situation is not sustainable in the long term.
While Norwich had tried to grow by acquisition and developing its business at the end of the day it couldn't get to a suitable size quickly enough.
"Because of our position in the market, the decisions has been taken to sell our local life insurance, superannuation, unit trust and fund management interests," he says.
"Norwich ploughed its own furrow and it ploughed it effectively enough," he says.
"It certainly is a tough market," Gascoigne says.
| « Is asset allocation a hoax? | King builds an empire » |
Special Offers
© Copyright 1997-2025 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved