Commission stops property offer

The Securities Commission has banned the offer documents for the James Smith Car Park Property scheme offered by Regional Realty Limited.

The Wellington carpark building was being offered for sale to investors for $21 million by Regional Realty Limited (Regional Realty), under a proportionate property ownership scheme.

"The offer documents for the scheme did not comply with the law and were likely to mislead investors," Commission chairman Jane Diplock said. "By law the securities in the scheme cannot be allotted, and investors must be given the opportunity to have their money refunded."

The commission decided late last month to prohibit distribution of the offer documents for the scheme, after receiving a complaint the previous day. No public statement was made until Regional Realty had an opportunity to be heard by the commission. All subscription money was held in a solicitor’s trust account.

Regional Realty director Mark Winter appeared with his solicitors before the commission this week. After that meeting the commission decided to continue the prohibition order.

"Investors were not given all the information they are entitled to," Diplock said. "In particular the valuation information provided in the offer document was inadequate".

Regional Realty was relying on a commission class exemption to offer interests in the scheme to investors. The class exemption allows an issuer to give investors an offeror’s statement and a valuation report instead of an investment statement and registered prospectus. These documents must contain all of the information specified in the exemption notice. The offeror, Regional Realty, is responsible for ensuring that investors receive this information, including the required valuation information.

The commission found numerous flaws in the offer documents, including:

• The role of Regional Realty in relation to the sale was unclear, and likely to mislead or confuse investors. Regional Realty told the commission it is acting in dual roles, both as the seller of the building and the responsible real estate agent through whom the offer is made. The commission found that this dual role was not explained in the offeror’s Statement, which also failed to tell investors about their right to complain to the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand.
• The offeror’s statement was likely to mislead or confuse investors regarding the financial standing of the tenant, Shortland Street Carpark Limited. The offeror’s statement did not contain information about the financial standing of this company, as required, but instead gave information about the standing of the Manson Development group of companies (one of which has a half share in Shortland Street Carpark Limited through a joint venture) without stating that the tenant has no recourse to the assets of that group.
• The valuation report in the offeror’s Statement did not contain all the material information required to be given to investors under this exemption. Regional Realty had obtained a further report that was available on request. The commission found that in the circumstances this report should have been given to all investors along with the offeror’s statement.
• The offeror’s statement and the attached valuation failed to disclose material information, including information about the assumptions underlying the valuation, and about the recent sale of the building for $16 million, and the valuer’s reasons for believing that the $21 million valuation is justified.

Regional Realty has told the commission that it intends to redraft the offer documents for the scheme and re-offer interests in the scheme in compliance with the law. Regional Realty will need to apply to the commission to lift its prohibition order before recommencing the offer.

« Super funds fees to be laid bare

Sovereign takes regulation bull by the horns »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

www.GoodReturns.co.nz

© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved