by Rob Hosking
He says under the bill new regulations will not have to face Parliamentary debate.
Officials have already begun working out what form those regulations should take.
The bill currently includes requirements to disclose all possible conflicts of interests, any associations or remuneration which might appear to be a conflict of interest, all commission, including “soft” commissions, whether a client is being “churned” and the impact of that churn, professional qualifications, and any rulings by a professional body against that adviser.
It is the form these disclosures will take which requires the focus from the industry at the moment, says Foley. “There’s a need for input from stakeholders – now,” he says. “Some of the responses from the industry have been a bit thinner than I would have liked to see. We need to see a lot more engagement with these issues.”
Foley says this is a “tall order” for the industry, which he says is still working through the changes proposed by last year’s Task Force on Financial Intermediaries.
There will be teething problems, no matter what is decided.
Rob Hosking is a Wellington-based freelance writer specialising in political, economic and IT related issues.
| « Co-regulation hard to make work: Kent | Sovereign takes regulation bull by the horns » |
Special Offers
© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved