by Paul McBeth
Strategy Financial Services' Graeme Lindsay, who has 40 years in the industry, says he has yet to get a straight answer from officials overseeing the implementation of the new regime, but last week's draft code of conduct has convinced him that advisers who deal solely with risk-based life and health insurance products will not need to be authorised.
When assessing a client's needs, "someone working in life insurance doesn't do complete analysis, they only analyse a component of a person's financial affairs," Lindsay told Good Returns. He says that provided life insurance advisers do not venture into the realm of savings and investment advice, they will not be advising on Category One products and should not need to be authorised.
Lindsay warns that if advisers like him are caught under the new regime, there will be an exodus of experienced people, who do not see the need to go through unnecessary training.
Vance Arkinstall, chief executive of the Investment Savings and Insurance Association, agrees there is a lack of clarity about life insurance advisers' need to get authorisation, with the main area of contention being whether needs analysis will be classified as financial planning.
If there is a greater number of advisers who need training, Arkinstall is concerned that they may put too much pressure on the training providers, and create a bubble that will not be able to be filled by the end of the year when the regime comes into effect.
Still, Angus Dale-Jones, director of supervision at the Securities Commission who has helped oversee the implementation of the new regulatory framework, says those advisers who only deal with Category Two products in a sales capacity will not need to be authorised. However, if they want to be able to offer a full financial advisory service, and help boost the industry's standing in the public eye, it is in their best interest to meet the higher requirements.
He also reiterated that the final definitions of products as they fall in the categories had not been finalised, and that the process was still in the select committee stage.
Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.
« Court of Appeal reserves decision on Tower ANZ battle | Prudential says it plans to retain AIA Australia » |
Special Offers
© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Life insurance takes care of debt and ongoing income needs for lifestyle and retirement planning, education and sucession.
Income protection keeps the mortgage in place and allows people to protect and keep in place lifestyle and hard earned assets
I don't need to go over the other areas
The point is if you are giving best advice you WILL be analysing a clients complete financial situation and looking at protecting all the assets, investments, lifestyle choices, while not necessarily giving advice on the management of these.
Your advice has a huge impact on a clients financial security and therefore should justify and in depth analysis.