About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, July 18th, 7:09PM
rss
Investment News

Performance fee update – lesson for NZ

Pathfinder wrote a series of four articles through 2015 on performance fees which were published here on Good Returns.  Off the back of these articles Pathfinder was asked to help Reuters Thomson in Europe with a piece on Italian performance fees.  John Berry believes the findings of that work provide an important lesson for New Zealand financial advisers and the Financial Markets Authority.

Friday, November 25th 2016, 6:51AM 2 Comments

by Pathfinder Asset Management

 

The background

Thomson Reuters (Milan) noticed that performance fees charged by Italian fund providers seemed to be higher than elsewhere in Europe.   2015 performance fees as a percentage of assets under management (or “AUM”) for European managers referenced by Reuters are below:

Manager Country Performance fee as a % of AUM
Banca Mediolanum Italy 0.46%
Azimut Italy 0.43%
Banca Generali Italy 0.31%
Henderson Group UK 0.11%
Amundi France 0.01%
GAM Holdings Switzerland 0.07%

Reuters’ focus was on the highest charge in the table - Banca Mediolanum.  Mediolanum is a significant Italian fund provider with €37 billion under management, which is one and a half times NZ’s entire KiwiSaver market.  Pathfinder was approached by Reuters Milan due to the lack of help from European fund managers in reviewing the performance fee structure.

How not to construct a performance fee

According to Reuters, investors in Mediolanum’s Emerging Markets Fund suffered an 8.3% loss in 2015 yet the bank earned a performance fee of 1.4%.  How does that work?  The explanation for Mediolanum’s performance fees are buried in its prospectus documents – which exceed 250 pages (and we thought fund prospectus documents in NZ were too complex and long!).

Mediolanum structured the performance fee in the most investor-unfriendly way possible:

  • There is no high water mark – this means if the fund goes down and up again the manager can be rewarded twice for the same performance.
  • The performance fee is calculated monthly - this is a ridiculously short period. If the fund is down 11 out of 12 months in the year and up one month, the performance fee is paid for that one month even if the fund is down for the year.
  • The benchmark above which the performance fee is earned is a cash rate – yet equity benchmarks should be used for equity funds.
  • There is no margin above the cash rate - if a cash rate must be used it should have a margin like +5% before the fee is earned.

The last two of these (the cash benchmark with no margin) are simply quite unbelievable.  The cash rate is 3 month EURIBOR (the inter-bank lending rate for European banks – like LIBOR in the UK).  The 3 month EURIBOR rate has been negative for well over a year! 

Lesson for New Zealand – regulatory arbitrage

Mediolanum is the second largest promoter of funds out of Ireland.  Issuing out of Ireland is curious, given it is selling to Italian retail investors.  Could it be using Ireland because its performance fee structure would be illegal for an Italian issuer but is not illegal for an Irish issuer?  (Ireland only has non-binding guidelines for performance fees, which Mediolanum’s structure does not comply with!).

There are 28 members of the Eurozone.  Each country’s regulated banks and their funds have a “passport” to operate anywhere in Europe.  An Italian issuer is free to use an Irish vehicle and then sell the fund into another European jurisdiction.  Mediolanum appear to be “arbitraging” this regulatory flexibility by selecting a lenient jurisdiction and circumventing tougher home country rules.

Why is this relevant to NZ? New Zealand is entering a fund passport arrangement with Australia, Japan and Korea which is to be effective from the end of 2017.   Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines and also expected to join.  The FMA and financial advisers need to be aware of “regulatory arbitrage” opportunities as the passport structure is implemented and expanded.  In Europe local regulators can stop funds being sold in their home market if the issuer has moved abroad to by-pass local rules, however the Italian regulator has not prevented Mediolanum’s structure (and was likely unaware of it).

End result?

Thompson Reuters published the performance fee story in October 2016 which subsequently appeared in an Irish daily paper.   Reuters quote Massimo Doris (the CEO of Banca Mediolanum) as saying their performance fee structure is “perfectly legal” which of course is technically correct, but the fee structure is clearly not in the interests of their investors.  He also added that the bank is now reviewing its fee structure. 

There is a lesson in this for NZ’s financial advisers and the FMA – take care to protect NZ investors when our domestic fund market becomes increasingly integrated within the wider Asian region.

The Reuters News article by Danilo Masoni is available here:  
 

John Berry

John Berry is a founder of Pathfinder Asset Management Limited and is an independent director of Punakaiki Fund Limited. Disclosure of interest:  John Berry invests in all Pathfinder funds and in Punakaiki Fund Limited.

Tags: Pathfinder Asset Management

« Inflation returns to the global economy?Trump: Uncertainty as well as hope »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 25 November 2016 at 8:24 am Brent Sheather said:
More good work from John Berry. The other lesson for the non-compromised minority at the FMA is that it is not a good look when random third parties like the media do your job for you. Indeed it is a bit embarrassing. I wonder how many past, present or future employees of Banca Mediolanum are on the board of the Italian regulatory authority?

A huge indictment of the Italian/Irish regulators given that even our rules around performance fees look good.
On 25 November 2016 at 11:31 am John Milner said:
Sad but really not surprising. My experience in Europe has been much of the same. Fraught with prehistoric investment policies and plenty of institutions and advisers to push them.

Upon reflection, our little nation is punching well above its weight in a lot of areas. Although there is plenty of room for improvement. But enough said about the Ministry of Banking as Brent would say. Still seeing lots of advice that was great 20 years ago.

Better than the 40 years in Europe I guess.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend

Good Returns Investment Centre is brought to you by:

Subscribe Now

Keep up to date with the latest investment news
Subscribe to our newsletter today

FundSource Research
  • Westpac Premium Investment Funds
    27 May 2019
    The Westpac Premium Investment Funds offers a focused investment menu of multi-manager single sector funds that draws on all of the BTNZ investment teams...
  • Westpac KiwiSaver Scheme
    27 May 2019
    The Westpac KiwiSaver Scheme offers a focused investment menu of multi-manager diversified funds that draws on all of the BTNZ investment team full capabilities...
  • Milford KiwiSaver Balanced Fund
    3 May 2019
    The Milford KiwiSaver Balanced Fund is a multi-asset portfolio that is best suited to long term investors who can accept some investment risk over the...
© 2019 FundSource Research.

View more research papers »

Edison Investment Research
  • Martin Currie Global Portfolio Trust
    17 July 2019
    New manager motoring ahead
    Martin Currie Global Portfolio Trust’s (MNP) investment performance has improved considerably following the appointment of Zehrid Osmani as lead...
  • Hansa Trust
    12 July 2019
    Finding opportunities away from the mainstream
    Hansa Trust (HAN/HANA) is arguably unique in its sector, with a portfolio made up of global equities, regional and thematic funds, diversifying (mainly...
  • Dragon Capital
    12 July 2019
    Executive Interview
    Vietnam Enterprise Investmentst (VEIL) was launched in 1995 and is the largest closed-ended fund focused on Vietnam. In July 2017, it became a member of...
© 2019 Edison Investment Research.

View more research papers »

Today's Best Bank Rates
Heartland Bank 2.15  
Heartland Bank 2.15  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
Cash PIE Rates

Cash Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ 0.10    0.10    0.11
ASB Bank 0.10    0.41    0.42
ASB Bank 0.25    0.59    0.56
ASB Bank 0.30    0.61    0.64
ASB Bank 0.35    0.66    0.69
ASB Bank 0.40    0.72    0.75
BNZ 0.10    0.10    0.10
Heartland Bank 1.75    2.59    2.70
Kiwibank 0.75    0.77    0.88
Kiwibank 1.75    1.81    1.89
Nelson Building Society 3.75    3.90    4.08
SBS Bank 1.50    -    -
TSB Bank 1.60    1.64    1.71
Westpac 0.35    0.36    0.38
Westpac 0.10    0.10    0.11
Westpac 1.85    2.16    2.26

Term Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ Term Fund - 90 days 2.65    2.60    2.79
ANZ Term fund - 12 months 3.40    3.39    3.55
ANZ Term Fund - 120 days 3.00    3.09    3.22
ANZ Term fund - 6 months 3.25    3.45    3.60
ANZ Term Fund - 150 days 3.00    -    -
ANZ Term Fund - 9 months 3.40    -    -
ANZ Term Fund - 18 months 3.45    -    -
ANZ Term Fund - 2 years 3.50    -    -
ANZ Term Fund - 5 years 3.80    -    -
ASB Bank Term Fund - 90 days 2.60    2.67    2.79
ASB Bank Term Fund - 6 months 3.20    3.29    3.43
ASB Bank Term Fund - 12 months 3.20    3.33    3.48
ASB Bank Term Fund - 18 months 3.50    3.65    3.81
ASB Bank Term Fund - 2 years 3.65    3.81    3.98
ASB Bank Term Fund - 5 years 4.10    4.28    4.48
ASB Bank Term Fund - 9 months 3.60    3.75    3.92
BNZ Term PIE - 120 days 2.65    -    -
BNZ Term PIE - 150 days 2.80    3.38    3.53
BNZ Term PIE - 5 years 3.00    3.86    4.04
BNZ Term PIE - 2 years 3.00    3.91    4.09
BNZ Term PIE - 18 months 3.00    3.65    3.81
BNZ Term PIE - 12 months 3.00    3.38    3.53
BNZ Term PIE - 9 months 3.10    3.44    3.60
BNZ Term PIE - 6 months 3.05    3.75    3.92
BNZ Term PIE - 90 days 2.30    2.72    2.85
Co-operative Bank PIE Term Fund - 6 months 3.40    -    -
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 12 months 3.35    3.53    3.69
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 6 months 3.25    3.43    3.58
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 9 months 3.35    3.85    4.02
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 18 months 3.35    -    -
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 2 years 3.35    3.43    3.58
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 5 years 3.55    3.85    4.02
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 90 days 2.65    2.72    2.82
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 6 months 3.40    3.49    3.65
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 12 months 3.50    3.39    3.55
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 150 days 3.15    3.65    3.81
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 120 days 2.95    3.03    3.17
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 9 months 3.40    3.49    3.65
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 150 days 3.00    2.88    3.00
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 120 days 3.30    3.38    3.53
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 18 months 3.50    3.29    3.43
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 12 months 3.50    3.49    3.65
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 6 months 3.30    3.44    3.60
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 9 months 3.35    3.17    3.32
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 90 days 2.75    2.56    2.67
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 2 years 3.70    3.79    3.96
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com