Property investment not always the solution: Alexander

Property investment is not for everyone and those who understand it should look out for their less savvy friends and family, says BNZ chief economist Tony Alexander.

Friday, September 14th 2012, 12:00AM 5 Comments

by The Landlord

He says while it is a good way to build wealth, we will soon see people who should not be investing gearing themselves up as prices rise and messages increase about the need to build wealth.

“Not because they are greedy but because they will be told they are missing out on something and this it is easy to participate – which it is. But what always happens in asset cycles is that assessment of risk goes out the window.”

He says people do not consider things such as whether they will understand why things might turn bad, whether will know what to do to fix, whether they will know when to cut their losses if need be, and whether they understand that it can be hard to sell in a falling market.

“Will you ultimately become willing to accept a certain large loss in order to sleep at night not worrying about losing more?”

He says people should understand that if they are offered guaranteed rent for a period, that amount will have been added to the purchase price. “Do you understand that unless you buy a wide spread of properties from all around the country, long-term graphs showing projected returns based on historical experience are worthless?”

He says there are fundamentals supporting rising prices, such as increasing building costs, the unwillingness of New Zealanders to open up large tracts of land to be developed, councils’ fees for developers and a shortage of housing stock in parts of the country.

“But property investment is not suitable for your 65-year-old widowed aunt who lives in a mortgage-free house, survives on superannuation and who has $50,000 in her bank for emergencies. It is not optimal for her to gear her house back up again to try to boost her income or to be sucked into thinking she needs to build more wealth to pass on to her nieces and nephews. The younger generation are quite able to look after themselves.”

He says people should invest widely, diversify and put their money only into things they understand.  “And for those of us with above average knowledge of these things, we have a duty to keep an eye on our less sophisticated friends and relatives… I am firmly of the view that it is the fear of missing out rather than greed which drives us to investments which are not optimal for us.”

« Water is landlords' responsibility: APIAFree Investment Property Showcase Events: Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 18 September 2012 at 4:09 pm sMiles said:
Wow. The ultimate bank economist property promoter warns of house prices turning bad, cutting losses, falling markets, and worthless graphs. The bank does not want bad debt.

He mentions fundamentals supporting rising prices including the unwillingness of New Zealanders to open up large tracts of land to be developed. Surely New Zealanders as a group do not control that. Councils like Auckland Council control opening up large tracts of land for development.

His commentary is a warning which only makes sense if he knows information which others can only guess about. If central government wants affordable housing in Auckland thereby cutting housing costs for government funded beneficiaries, it must pressure Auckland Council to deliver up large tracts of land for development. Perhaps that may have an effect upon all house prices as it rolls up the hierarchy of markets. That could affect bank customers. Interesting times may be coming.
On 18 September 2012 at 4:36 pm Jeremy said:
The thing is, that it is not easy to 'diversify' when basically your bank will only lend on property. You try asking you bank manager for $400k to invest on the share market and see where you get. I have invested in property because it is relatively low risk, the downside is not tragic, and the upside huge. Why wouldn't you?
On 18 September 2012 at 4:41 pm stanace said:
Why is it not suitable for the 65yr old aunt?
She can't go to Foodtown, or a holiday to Fiji, and say "I have a mortgage free house that is worth 3 times what I paid for it, please give me credit."

The younger generation can look after themselves, so why should she not enjoy herself also?
On 18 September 2012 at 6:36 pm Seraj said:
With all do respect to Tony, I find his views to be like amateur forex day traders. One minute they think the market is going up and the next they think its going down, and they give supporting views that they portray as if it were empirical evidence and finally hope that some of what they thought or said will stick to the wall. A few weeks ago Tony came out on the local radio channel talking about a property boom. Well I guess the average person listens to 'Economic media stars' like Tony or Gareth Morgan instead of going with information that matters from other sources.
On 19 September 2012 at 10:53 am Andrew said:
I also think the 65yo aunt is a bad example. She seems in a very strong position to start a portfolio, forgetting capital gains, she could do well with cashflow positive properties. She's probably got another 20 years of life left, why waste it "surviving" on super? Colonel Sanders started KFC at age 65.

Sign In to add your comment

www.GoodReturns.co.nz

© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved