FNZ bought rival software company GBST in July 2019, however regulators had concerns the deal would lead to a loss of competition.
Competition watchdog, The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), intervened in March 2020 to express concerns about how the deal would affect the market.
The CMA has completed its investigation and released a report on Friday saying it had not been convinced that the uniting of the two fintech firms would be good for the industry.
“The loss of competition brought about by the deal could lead to investment platforms, and therefore UK consumers who rely on these platforms for administer their pensions and other investments, facing higher costs and lower quality services,” it says.
The CMA added that the findings were based on data and internal documents supplied by FNZ and GBST, as well as “extensive information provided by a wide variety of customers, competitors and other stakeholders”.
CMA said it took into consideration “a number of remedies” but ultimately concluded that “requiring FNZ to sell the entire GBST business is the only solution."
The merger of the firms was blocked by the CMA in early August; with FNZ clapping back later that month, arguing that the CMA’s claims regarding a lack of competition come from its “narrow” view of the retail market, which is “at odds” with the evidence.
Martin Coleman, Chair of the CMA inquiry group said in a statement: “We have found that FNZ and GBST are two of the leading suppliers of retail investment platform solutions, and that they compete with each other closely and face few other suppliers of similar standing.
“The merge has substantially reduced competition in this sector.
“This matters to the millions of UK consumers who hold pensions or other investments. This is because competition plays a key role in driving price and quality.
“Without healthy competition, costs could go up and service quality could get worse.”
Coleman said: “FNZ chose to complete its acquisition of GBST without first seeking merger clearance in the UK, which it is perfectly entitled to do.
“This came with the risk that the CMA could call the case in for investigation and that, if competition concerns were found, FNZ could be required to see off all of the business it had just acquired.”
| « [UPDATED] Full licensing rules finally released | Mann on a mission to diversify financial advice » |
Special Offers
No comments yet
Sign In to add your comment
© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved