4 Comments 4 Commentsby Eric Frykberg
The Government has just announced big changes to the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA).
This follows a storm of criticism of the Act and a review ordered by the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, David Clark.
The Act, which came into effect last December was intended to protect vulnerable borrowers, but ended up penalising almost everyone.
In making the changes, Clark said there was “little enthusiasm for wholesale changes to the Act, but instead a preference for some practical amendments.”
And he said there was no reason to think the CCCFA was the main driver in reduced lending.
It was also important to note the changes were not the final word.
The changes include removing regular 'savings' and 'investments' as examples of outgoings that lenders need to enquire into when assessing the borrower's future expenses.
They also clarify that when borrowers provide a detailed breakdown of their future living expenses, and these are benchmarked against robust statistical data, there is no need to also enquire into their current living expenses from recent bank transactions.
They also say that where lenders choose to estimate future expenses from recent bank transaction records, they are permitted to obtain information about how their current expenses are likely to change once the contract is entered into.
And they say that the requirement to obtain information in ‘sufficient detail’ only relates to information provided by borrowers directly, rather than relating to information from bank transaction records.
They provide further guidance on when a lender needs to allow for a ‘reasonable surplus’ and how lenders should set surplus requirement.
And the changes provide alternative guidance and examples for when it is ‘obvious’ that a loan is affordable. In cases like that, a full income and expense assessment will not be required.
| « Ownership changes at SuperCity Mortgages | Mortgage advisers welcome CCCFA reform, but more detail needed » |
Special Offers
Sign In to add your comment
© Copyright 1997-2024 Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Are you serious Mr Clark,
“’The changes include removing regular 'savings' and 'investments' as examples of outgoings that lenders need to enquire into when assessing the borrower's future expenses?
They also clarify that when borrowers provide a detailed breakdown of their future living expenses, and these are benchmarked against robust statistical data, there is no need to also enquire into their current living expenses from recent bank transactions.
They also say that where lenders choose to estimate future expenses from recent bank transaction records, they are permitted to obtain information about how their current expenses are likely to change once the contract is entered into.
And they say that the requirement to obtain information in ‘sufficient detail’ only relates to information
provided by borrowers directly, rather than relating to information from bank transaction records.””
Lenders in New Zealand have been applying common sense to lending applications for over 100 years already Mr Clark and they have some of the lowest mortgage defaults in the southern hemisphere.
Now embarrassingly you’re telling the experts the basics of how to run their business, amazing to you have so many talents and expertise in a wide variety of Industries.
I’m still shocked to see yet another overpopulated government department spending taxpayers’ money to overregulate yet another industry causing a reverse negative effect on consumers.
Ask any banker, mortgage adviser, real estate agent, conveyancing lawyer if the CCCFA changes have had a negative effect on mortgage lending and I would say you would get a resounding Yes! all round.
I feel for all the perfectly sound potential mainstream mortgage borrows that have missed out on purchasing the family home over the last 4 months because they purchased Uber eats that one time to many over a three-month period.
MBIE among their many talents and different industry expertise really need to get there research right before making half-baked recommendations and changing Acts that effect lives, if only there was some person accountability for one’s mistakes, now wouldn’t that be something new for the current Government