News
Judgment reveals C+M's poor state
Thursday 6th of December 2007
C+M sought, on November 23, an ex parte injunction at the High Court at Auckland to stop wholesale funder Fortress appointing receivers.In his judgement Justice Harrison outlines the state of the business and he repeatedly makes it clear C+M was in a perilous position.
"I am in no doubt that CMF will be unable to remain solvent for much longer. Its prospects are slim, I repeat, of continu...
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
Latest Comments
Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
Of course it is the responsibility of the insurer to clearly communicate with its Policy holders, and Advisers together, regarding all changes on a Policy.
There is at least one insurer that feels that a simple email to the Advisor on every Anniversary renewal is a bit too much for them! The Advisor has to be pro-active and chase renewal communications every year through the Insurer's website. Where is the responsibility of the insurer there?
10 hours ago Porus Kateli
Fidelity Life sold to Partners
Can the New Zealand Life Insurance afford further shrinkage? With AIA performing so poorly options to insure will fall to just Partners, Asteron ( Acenda) and Chubb for mainstream Life Insurers. Of course there is PSP but they have a very small, targeted client group.
11 hours ago Quality Advice
AIA moves into wealth with annuity launch planned
This is great news indeed, well done AIA. I hope you were able to solve the tax treatment which plagued this cornerstone product.
1 day ago Goldcard
FE Investments in receivership
Fei , trustees still hold large of money not yet refund fully.
2 weeks ago Raymond Yang
Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
There is no doubt the obligation is on the insurer who the contract is with.
Clearly it would be prudent for an adviser to assist once given clear information by an insurer to assist with the communication but to extend this further. For an insurer to attempt to slide this onto an advisers plate is abdication. The adviser can not change the contract.
2 weeks ago Darryl Scott