KiwiSaver
Retirement Commissioner Gains Taskforce Schools Competition
Sunday 30th of January 2000
The Retirement Commissioner, Colin Blair, will take responsibility for a secondary schools competition on retirement issues following today's announcement by Steve Maharey, Minister of Social Services and Employment officially disestablishing the Super 2000 Taskforce.
"We are very pleased the Government has recognised the value of keeping this educational project alive," says Colin Blair. "The competition is an innovative way to encourage young people to think about future changes in the age structure of our society, and the implications in the area of retirement income policy. It encourages students to discuss the issues with parents and others in the community." "The competition compliments our Financial Literacy Programme which is also aimed at senior secondary school students," he says. "The success of this programme lies with its ability to equip young people with the essential financial know-how to survive when they leave school." Interest in the competition from students and teachers has been high throughout the country with 104 schools and 411 teams having entered since it was launched by the Super 2000 Taskforce in October last year. Students have until 3 July to complete assignments which will set out their proposals for retirement income policy. Students must demonstrate that their policy is fair, affordable, efficient, sustainable and has the support of their school community. The Retirement Commissioner says he is looking forward to working with the schools already involved and emphasises that it is still not too late for other schools to participate. They can find more information about the competition and how to enter by visiting the Office of the Retirement Commissioner's website www.retirement.org.nz Schools have until Friday 3 March to register their entry. The incentive to participate is a $42,000 prize package supported by financial services company Armstrong Jones. Schools can win up to $8,000 in prizes and students up to $6,000 for winning entries. "This is an exciting competition with a challenging assignment, but thanks to Armstrong Jones the incentives for schools and individual students are very worthwhile," says Colin Blair.
Want to read the full article?
Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.
You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.
Latest News
Latest Comments
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Paul Flood: The danger is that the 'goalposts' (regarding what is acceptable or unacceptable adviser conduct) may be susceptible to change. Our 'Principles based' legal/regulatory environment lends itself to “prevalence-induced concept change” over time, perhaps not so much in the written laws and Code, as in the interpretation of the prescribed principles.
2 days ago Steve Wright
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Just a tip, if you use more than six, six letter words in a sentence you lose most Kiwi's. So avoid client/adviser confusion when writing your post or article if you would like it read and understood.
Ironically, my last sentence was not likely read.
3 days ago Backstage
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
All things said are great aspirational goals for a great financial advice industry, it mirrors what both the legislation and the code requires.
However, like most things discussed it talks about what's expected not how it's done. The hardest aspect of financial advice today isn't what it is, it is how it is done.
The how only comes from those that have done it, the how is only provided with examples. Guidance documents that spell out what's required along side how it it done.
We’re still dealing with the same issues we started with in 2021, figuring out the how. And figuring out the how in every advice business is consuming resources that could easily be shortcut by the FMA demonstrating what they are expecting.
It's not about “do it this way” its about this is the sorts of things we’re looking for.
In the absence of standards and expectations, guesswork prevails. That represents significant risk to FAPs and the result is onerous overcooked advice processes for multiple advice operations and undercooked she’ll be right for single operators focused on getting the work done.
Both approaches have potential for harm and as its been said earlier, leaves advisers open to explain they haven't been speeding with the authorities have pulled them over.
The advice industry needs guidance on the how we know the what already.
5 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
Sticking an oar in, while we have “service” requirements the expectation that an adviser is responsible for discussing said change is relying heavily on assumption.
1. That the client hasn't moved and contact details haven't been updated. It happens more often than many think.
2. It assumes there is a servicing agreement in place to provide service. Remember the requirement is to scope service not provide it. A client deciding to have ad-hoc service on their request is a legally valid position to have.
3. If there is a service agreement that's realistic to what is expected, how long does the adviser push the issue to have the discussion before moving on with everything else they have to do? Again, a point that is not clear in the guidance to date.
The challenge of the present rules is the adviser is responsible for ensuring the client understands the advice provided.
How do you ensure you're covering this if a client doesn't engage despite genuine attempts to manage it?
There's still a lot of “what if’s” in this whole are we’re only going to have clarity on once someone is taken to task about it.
But first we need to have clarity on what ongoing service actually is, because right now demonstrated by the direct providers a letter once per year with a please call if you want to discuss is the current minimum…
5 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
To correct errors in my previous post: "policies, templates, and controls" should read "policies, processes, systems and controls", and "is more conductive" should read "is more conducive".
5 days ago Paul Flood