Providers need to win back public trust: English
UPDATED: Savings and investment product providers need to lift their game in helping the industry shed its image of distrust with the public and have been too keen to push their own agenda. Financial advisers need to lift their game in helping the industry shed its image of distrust with the public and have been too keen to push their own agenda, Finance Minister Bill English told a seminar in Wellington
Tuesday, June 30th 2009, 5:26AM 
4 Comments
by Paul McBeth
While the Retirement Commission had succeeded in attracting partnerships with the private sector and educating the public about financial literacy, companies selling savings and investment products had stuck to their ‘self-interested' ways, Finance Minister Bill English told a seminar in Wellington on Friday.
English said it isn't the government's job to improve the public's understanding of the sector, though he did commit to a twice-yearly meeting with the Retirement Commission's advisory committee to discuss ways to boost New Zealanders' financial literacy.
"Product providers want people to buy their products or agree with their opinion or come to their institution," he told the financial literacy summit in Wellington. Lifting financial literacy will go a long way toward rebuilding trust in the financial sector and encouraging people to engage with it, he said.
Keynote speaker Annamaria Lusardi, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College in the U.S., said the finance sector needs to move away from commission-based advice, which encouraged advisers to sell their more expensive products, rather than what was suitable for their client.
Still, she said, the public didn't rely on financial advisers enough, and that was one of the major causes of the credit crisis in America.
A simple way to improve literacy among the wider public was to reduce the complexity of the products available. If it's difficult for someone with a PhD to get their head around a product, imagine how hard it must be for the average person, she said.
Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.
| « News round-up | Sovereign takes regulation bull by the horns » |
Comments from our readers
What he actually said was not "financial advisers" but "Product providers want people to buy their products or agree with their opinion or come to their institution."
So a rather different message than in the headline and article.
But i'll tell you why the public mistrust fiancial advisers.
It's because we live in a toothless regulatory environment that allows companies like ING, significant players in the market place (default KiwiSaver provider are they not?) to get away with losing 80% of 14,000 customers money, blaming misread 'market conditions' and other fanciful reasons and then screwing these same customers with a 'commercial offer' that seals in a 40% loss due to the blackmail release form requirement. All praise to the financial advisers who tried to get a full product recall and get ING to do the proper thing and recall a failed product. It was not only for our clients but for the industry as a whole. This bitter cup taste is going linger long in investors minds and financial advisers attempting to recommend any managed fund product are going to be challenged doing so. ING could have acknowledged their inability to deliver the extensive and repeated promises they made about their funds and recalled the product - just like has been with similar cases in USA, Canada, and Great Britain to name a few. That could have been a midas touch for them, but instead they chose the route of toughing it out, taking the abuse and admitting nothing. Thank god for Bell Gully eh? However, by contrast it is the advisers who stood up and were counted for the betterment of our industry even if they may have failed to bring accountability so far that deserve credit. That took character, back bone and strength amidst powerful forces against them; would have been easy to simply wimp out and 'keep my head down' as was heard from so often.
And just so I am seen to be totally unbiased, Bill, how come Rod Petricievic is still not in jail? In USA we find Madoff in the slammer literally weeks from being accused and now set for another 150 years.... hymmm, only about 6 months later Bill. Before you go around slagging off on financial advisers get your machinery and mechanisms working so that cheating and thieving has no place in New Zealand any longer. Only then we will see public distrust start to disappear.
Clayton,
The statement wasn't taken out of context, as it was the answer to a fairly direct question. Annamaria's point was that if the products are so difficult as to make experts struggle, by removing the complexity you make it easier for everyone to understand, and was a very simple way to lift literacy and accessibility. I've tweaked the story a touch to make this a littler clearer.
Fully agree in regard to following Australia's lead - it's something we kiwis seem to do rather well.
Thanks for reading and commenting,
Paul.
Add your comment:
|
|
Printable version |
|
Email to a friend |
Philosophically, I believe that such full transparency should be sufficient to relegate the ‘fees versus commission’ discussion into being just a ‘preferred method a billing’ debate. However, we should expect the same outcome as is being implemented in Australian industry, whereby fees only advice is becoming the regulated and sole compensation mechanism to permanently separate the “product choice from the compensation”, and to reinforce professionalism. This is likely to occur in Australia as a result of separate but equivalent agreement between the funds and the financial planning associations and their members (to be introduced next year and enforced by 2012).