GoodReturns
976500584
0
0 Comment
Save Story
GR _Fund Source Fund Manager of the Year

Morningstar New Zealand Fund Manager of the Year 2013

Thursday 28th of February 2013

"The winners in the New Zealand Morningstar Awards have all shown themselves to be first-class stewards of their investors' capital. The quality of their people, process, philosophy, and investment style are a testament to this, and continue to enable them to provide outstanding results for their investors," Morningstar Australasia
Co-Head of Fund Research Chris Douglas said.


 

New Zealand Fund Manager of the Year 2013 – Milford Asset Management
The Morningstar New Zealand Fund Manager of the Year 2013 is Milford Asset Management. Milford has evolved from a small start-up with a limited product suite to a diversified contender in the local funds management industry. Brian Gaynor's Milford Active Growth Fund has been a market leader for many years now, but the lesser-known products are also impressive. Milford Trans Tasman has performed exceptionally well since inception, while the more recent addition of multisector funds has shown that there's much more to this firm than just New Zealand and Australian equities. Milford has reinvested continually in people and processes, and has a genuine focus on investor engagement. Transparency and disclosure are also a cut above the rest. Milford is setting the standard in the New Zealand funds management industry, and richly deserves the overall Fund Manager of the Year award.

Fixed Interest Category, New Zealand 2013 – Tyndall Investment Management
The Morningstar Fund Manager of the Year Fixed Interest 2013 is Tyndall Investment Management. Fergus McDonald has been a very dependable fixed interest manager during his many years at Tyndall, and
his performance in 2012 was proof of this small but highly-capable team's market knowledge and expertise. Tyndall's hefty but judicious exposure to credit and higher-running yield in 2012 contributed to the very strong showing, and long-term returns also impress. The admirable combination of people, process, and performance all mean that Tyndall is thoroughly deserving of winning the Fixed Interest category award.

Want to read the full article?

Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.

You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.

Sign in
Previous Article Next Article
Latest News
Advice adds at least 5% a year, but clients can’t see most of it
Advice adds at least 5% a year, but clients can’t see most of it
4 min read
Adviser use of ETFs likely to continue to grow, Smart says
Adviser use of ETFs likely to continue to grow, Smart says
2 min read
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
6 min read
[Weekly Wrap] KiwiSaver in play; but outcome unclear
[Weekly Wrap] KiwiSaver in play; but outcome unclear
2 min read
GR _Fund Source Fund Manager of the Year
More Read
Finalists announced for Good Returns Fund Manager of the Year 2020
Finalists announced for Good Returns Fund Manager of the Year 2020
2 min read
Fund Manager of Year battle between active and passive
Fund Manager of Year battle between active and passive
2 min read
New Awards
New Awards
1 min read
Morningstar New Zealand Fund Manager of the Year 2013
Morningstar New Zealand Fund Manager of the Year 2013
4 min read
Latest Comments
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Paul Flood: The danger is that the 'goalposts' (regarding what is acceptable or unacceptable adviser conduct) may be susceptible to change. Our 'Principles based' legal/regulatory environment lends itself to “prevalence-induced concept change” over time, perhaps not so much in the written laws and Code, as in the interpretation of the prescribed principles.
10 hours ago Steve Wright
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
Just a tip, if you use more than six, six letter words in a sentence you lose most Kiwi's. So avoid client/adviser confusion when writing your post or article if you would like it read and understood. Ironically, my last sentence was not likely read.
12 hours ago Backstage
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
All things said are great aspirational goals for a great financial advice industry, it mirrors what both the legislation and the code requires. However, like most things discussed it talks about what's expected not how it's done. The hardest aspect of financial advice today isn't what it is, it is how it is done. The how only comes from those that have done it, the how is only provided with examples. Guidance documents that spell out what's required along side how it it done. We’re still dealing with the same issues we started with in 2021, figuring out the how. And figuring out the how in every advice business is consuming resources that could easily be shortcut by the FMA demonstrating what they are expecting. It's not about “do it this way” its about this is the sorts of things we’re looking for. In the absence of standards and expectations, guesswork prevails. That represents significant risk to FAPs and the result is onerous overcooked advice processes for multiple advice operations and undercooked she’ll be right for single operators focused on getting the work done. Both approaches have potential for harm and as its been said earlier, leaves advisers open to explain they haven't been speeding with the authorities have pulled them over. The advice industry needs guidance on the how we know the what already.
2 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
Sticking an oar in, while we have “service” requirements the expectation that an adviser is responsible for discussing said change is relying heavily on assumption. 1. That the client hasn't moved and contact details haven't been updated. It happens more often than many think. 2. It assumes there is a servicing agreement in place to provide service. Remember the requirement is to scope service not provide it. A client deciding to have ad-hoc service on their request is a legally valid position to have. 3. If there is a service agreement that's realistic to what is expected, how long does the adviser push the issue to have the discussion before moving on with everything else they have to do? Again, a point that is not clear in the guidance to date. The challenge of the present rules is the adviser is responsible for ensuring the client understands the advice provided. How do you ensure you're covering this if a client doesn't engage despite genuine attempts to manage it? There's still a lot of “what if’s” in this whole are we’re only going to have clarity on once someone is taken to task about it. But first we need to have clarity on what ongoing service actually is, because right now demonstrated by the direct providers a letter once per year with a please call if you want to discuss is the current minimum…
2 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
To correct errors in my previous post: "policies, templates, and controls" should read "policies, processes, systems and controls", and "is more conductive" should read "is more conducive".
2 days ago Paul Flood