GoodReturns
976489429
Rob Hosking
Rob Hosking
Save Story
z_Trusts & Estate Planning

Promises to fix powers of attorney law unheeded

Friday 7th of May 2004

Age Concern has again raised the issue after a survey showed that more than 20% of the elderly had suffered “material, financial or psychological abuse” by someone they had entrusted with an enduring power of attorney.

The law allows people planning their retirement to give enduring power of attorney to another party when they can no longer manage their own affairs.

That power covers property, other personal care and welfare.

Three years ago the Law Commission recommended changes to the existing law.

A year ago Senior Citizens Minister Ruth Dyson promised an Age Concern conference that “policy proposals are being developing for Cabinet consideration,” and that action would shortly be taken.

That hasn’t happened. This week Minister for Public Trust Jim Anderton also promised action on the law, although – again – no time frame was given.

The problems with the current law, according to the Law Commission, are:

 A lack of monitoring of whether, on signing over the power, the donor actually understood what he or she is signing
    • Legal advice is not mandatory
    • No requirement for the attorney to file accounts, and no requirement for independent monitoring of the attorney
    • Limited powers for the Family Court to intervene. Enduring powers of attorney can be general or specific and it differs from an ordinary power of attorney in that it continues to be valid even if the person making it loses their legal capacity. They come in two forms: personal property and personal care and welfare. The first kind can be have a specific nominated date ”the second kind comes into effect only after the donor has become incapacitated, and can only be given to one person.

    There have been cases, the commission reported, of enduring powers of attorney being used to cover outright embezzlement, removal of property, and a failure to put the donor in care when needed so as to not reduce the value of the donor's estate.

    Want to read the full article?

    Click the button below to subscribe and will have free unlimited access for a limited time to full article and all other articles on the site.

    You will also be able to comment on articles on Good Returns.

    Sign in
    Previous Article Next Article
    Latest News
    Advice adds at least 5% a year, but clients can’t see most of it
    Advice adds at least 5% a year, but clients can’t see most of it
    4 min read
    Adviser use of ETFs likely to continue to grow, Smart says
    Adviser use of ETFs likely to continue to grow, Smart says
    2 min read
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    6 min read
    [Weekly Wrap] KiwiSaver in play; but outcome unclear
    [Weekly Wrap] KiwiSaver in play; but outcome unclear
    2 min read
    z_Trusts & Estate Planning
    More Read
    Tax of death and asset distributions to be clarified
    Tax of death and asset distributions to be clarified
    5 min read
    Promises to fix powers of attorney law unheeded
    Promises to fix powers of attorney law unheeded
    2 min read
    Risks in setting up own trust companies
    Risks in setting up own trust companies
    2 min read
    Individuals pose risks as trustees
    Individuals pose risks as trustees
    2 min read
    Latest Comments
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    Paul Flood: The danger is that the 'goalposts' (regarding what is acceptable or unacceptable adviser conduct) may be susceptible to change. Our 'Principles based' legal/regulatory environment lends itself to “prevalence-induced concept change” over time, perhaps not so much in the written laws and Code, as in the interpretation of the prescribed principles.
    13 hours ago Steve Wright
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    Just a tip, if you use more than six, six letter words in a sentence you lose most Kiwi's. So avoid client/adviser confusion when writing your post or article if you would like it read and understood. Ironically, my last sentence was not likely read.
    15 hours ago Backstage
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    All things said are great aspirational goals for a great financial advice industry, it mirrors what both the legislation and the code requires. However, like most things discussed it talks about what's expected not how it's done. The hardest aspect of financial advice today isn't what it is, it is how it is done. The how only comes from those that have done it, the how is only provided with examples. Guidance documents that spell out what's required along side how it it done. We’re still dealing with the same issues we started with in 2021, figuring out the how. And figuring out the how in every advice business is consuming resources that could easily be shortcut by the FMA demonstrating what they are expecting. It's not about “do it this way” its about this is the sorts of things we’re looking for. In the absence of standards and expectations, guesswork prevails. That represents significant risk to FAPs and the result is onerous overcooked advice processes for multiple advice operations and undercooked she’ll be right for single operators focused on getting the work done. Both approaches have potential for harm and as its been said earlier, leaves advisers open to explain they haven't been speeding with the authorities have pulled them over. The advice industry needs guidance on the how we know the what already.
    2 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
    Who is responsible for notifying policy changes?
    Sticking an oar in, while we have “service” requirements the expectation that an adviser is responsible for discussing said change is relying heavily on assumption. 1. That the client hasn't moved and contact details haven't been updated. It happens more often than many think. 2. It assumes there is a servicing agreement in place to provide service. Remember the requirement is to scope service not provide it. A client deciding to have ad-hoc service on their request is a legally valid position to have. 3. If there is a service agreement that's realistic to what is expected, how long does the adviser push the issue to have the discussion before moving on with everything else they have to do? Again, a point that is not clear in the guidance to date. The challenge of the present rules is the adviser is responsible for ensuring the client understands the advice provided. How do you ensure you're covering this if a client doesn't engage despite genuine attempts to manage it? There's still a lot of “what if’s” in this whole are we’re only going to have clarity on once someone is taken to task about it. But first we need to have clarity on what ongoing service actually is, because right now demonstrated by the direct providers a letter once per year with a please call if you want to discuss is the current minimum…
    2 days ago Jon-Paul Hale
    FMA outlines its latest expectations for advisers
    To correct errors in my previous post: "policies, templates, and controls" should read "policies, processes, systems and controls", and "is more conductive" should read "is more conducive".
    3 days ago Paul Flood