tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, March 19th, 10:57AM

Investments

rss
Investment News

A warning to advisers

The Banking Ombudsman says advisers, notably those which work for a bank, have to be careful about how they sell managed funds products to customers.

Tuesday, January 8th 2002, 1:37AM

Ombudsman's comments

After several years of good returns, investments with an equities component have done poorly in recent months. In some cases there has been a negative return.
As a result I am beginning to receive more complaints of a type that has previously been relatively uncommon and of which this case study is an example. Although I was satisfied that in this case the investment had been properly explained at the point of sale and that ultimately the customer had to take most of the responsibility for her decision, there was an element of oversell. I was also concerned that despite the best efforts of the bank staff involved, the customer did not fully understand that a fluctuation in the value of her investment could mean a very substantial decrease in its value in the short term.


There is nothing wrong in banks approaching customers with an offer to discuss products that may be of benefit to them, but repeated approaches can be unwelcome. An assertive customer will be comfortable to say no, but others may agree out of politeness or a wish to avoid being labelled as difficult.
This is not the only case I have seen where a customer whose main concern is that their capital should remain intact has been persuaded to take funds from a term deposit, where they were earning an adequate rate of return for their purposes, and invest them in a product that is likely to produce a higher rate of return in the medium to long term but also has a risk of negative returns.
I do not think it is good practice to encourage inexperienced investors to place their total savings into a product with a risk of capital loss unless it is absolutely clear that they understand that at any time in the lifetime of the investment there may be a sudden and substantial drop in its value and if such a drop occurs soon after the investment is made, it is likely that the value will drop below the original sum invested.

The following is a case study from the Banking Ombudsman regarding a complaint made against the way a bank has sold managed funds to a customer. The Banking Ombudsman provides some commentary on the case, and the way the bank operated, in the sidebar (right).

Mrs Y had her retirement savings in a savings account and a short-term deposit. In August 2000, she agreed to see an investment adviser at her bank and a number of investment options were discussed. After the meeting, the investment adviser wrote to her, recommending an investment in a managed funds product offered by the bank. He later contacted her again and there was a second meeting at which Mrs Y agreed to put her savings into that product. She invested a total of $280,000, $100,000 of which was taken from a term deposit at 7% per annum, which had to be broken.

Some four months later, Mrs Y found that the value of her investment had dropped by nearly $9,000. She was extremely upset and shocked and after some discussion with the bank, transferred the balance of her investment out of the managed funds product.

Mrs Y complained to her bank but failed to receive what she regarded as a satisfactory response. She then complained to me about the process by which she had been persuaded to put her savings into the managed funds product. She considered she had been rushed into transferring her funds into a product she did not want or need and that she had been the victim of a high powered and overwhelming sales pitch. She did not really understand all the features and the nature of the investment product and also said she had not received a proper explanation of the reason for the decline in the value of her funds.

The bank agreed that its staff had approached Mrs Y about investment services and that it was its policy to make such an approach to customers who had substantial funds on term deposit. Very often another type of investment was more suitable for such a customer and it felt it was providing excellent customer service by taking the initiative in this way. However, it became clear during the course of my investigation that Mrs Y was simply not a suitable customer for that type of customer service. She did not appreciate constantly being asked if she was interested in other bank products. She viewed what the bank saw as excellent customer service as pressure and harassment to which she eventually gave in.

I was satisfied that the bank staff had explained the product to Mrs Y and that the investment recommended to her was reasonably appropriate after a full and careful consideration of her circumstances. Nonetheless I was not so certain that she fully understood the nature of her investment. In particular, she did not realise that it was possible for the value of her original capital to decrease substantially right from the start of the investment or that she could incur a substantial loss in a matter of months.

I also concluded that she received a reasonable explanation for the rapid decline in the value of her investment. It was due mainly to falls in the value of world and New Zealand shares because of the slowing down of the US economy, which in turn affected the sharemarkets of other countries. However, I was concerned that the bank did not provide Mrs Y with good advice when it persuaded her to invest nearly all of her savings in managed funds and in particular when it advised her to break the term deposit that was already producing a good rate of return.

I proposed to recommend that the bank reimburse Mrs Y for the loss suffered in moving her investment out of the term deposit and for the loss of interest that she would have earned had her funds remained invested on term deposit.

Both the bank and Mrs Y accepted my proposed recommendation and the complaint was settled accordingly.

Read the Banking Ombudsman's comments here

Have Your Say and See What Others are saying on this issue here

« Succession planning: Selling to managersKing builds an empire »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend

Good Returns Investment Centre is brought to you by:

Subscribe Now

Keep up to date with the latest investment news
Subscribe to our newsletter today

Edison Investment Research
  • Electra Private Equity
    27 September 2021
    Introducing Hostmore and Unbound brands
    On 16 September, Electra Private Equity (ELTA) issued a trading update for its largest remaining hospitality brands, Fridays and 63rd+1st, and named the...
  • European Assets Trust
    21 September 2021
    Performance, income and a well-balanced portfolio
    European Assets Trust (EAT) aims to achieve long-term growth of capital through investments in smaller European companies (excluding the UK). EAT’s...
  • Georgia Capital
    13 September 2021
    Value creation on the back of macro recovery
    Georgia Capital (GCAP) posted a 13.2% NAV total return (TR) in local currency terms in H121 (15.2% in sterling), driven by an improved operating performance...
© 2024 Edison Investment Research.

View more research papers »

Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com