tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, May 1st, 6:50PM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

Finance companies disappointed with Rapid Ratings' departure

After four years trying to build up a business out of providing finance companies with both quantitative and qualitative credit ratings, Rapid Ratings has decided to pull out of that segment of the market.

Thursday, February 9th 2006, 8:59PM

by Jenny Ruth

Rapid Ratings New Zealand director Ron Keene says there were a number of reasons for ceasing to provide the service including the small number of finance companies prepared to pay to be rated and an even smaller number who were prepared to publish their ratings.

Rapid Ratings charged $25,000 per rating and Keene says his company spent a minimum of 125 hours analysing each company including non-public data and interviews with all the key executives and would produce comprehensive reports of between 70 and 100 pages.

Keene says about 14 companies had been rated over the four years.

A big problem for Rapid Ratings is that New Zealand lacks a strong ratings culture, he says. "You need the investors and financial planners providing a strong push on finance companies to be rated in order to attract investment."

But New Zealand investors seem interested only in chasing the highest interest rates available rather than being interested in how safe their investments are, he says.

Strategic Finance was the first company to be rated and after its fourth rating maintained its B1 investment grade rating, the highest awarded.

"We're a little disappointed" at Rapid Ratings' withdrawal, Strategic chief executive Kerry Finnigan says. Having a rating helped investors differentiate between finance companies. "It gave investors the confidence that all our internal processes and procedures and compliance was second to none."

Strategic's current rating expires in November, in the meantime the company will look at being rated by another ratings agency, probably either S&P or Fitch Ratings.

St Laurence Mortgages has a B3 rating which expires in October. "We were quite disappointed with their decision," says chief executive Paul Chapman.

"We got on the ratings train reasonably early. We saw it as a strategic move for the company." St Laurence will also consider an alternative rating, he says.

« ANZ to launch new fixed interest serviceFinance company news briefs »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “Yes unfortunately any mortgage business that has their own FAP are still having to go through regulation twice , once for...”
    2 days ago by valkyrie6
  • AIA revamps its distribution team
    “Best wishes but not sure the relevance of an English football team touring NZ - bringing this up reminds one of a time before...”
    2 days ago by k glynn
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    ““Most FAPs engaged 19 or fewer advisers and the most common business structure was a single-adviser FAP. About half of...”
    2 days ago by Amused
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “I think the findings of: 1.There are fewer complaints to FAPs, and 2.Although higher complaints to DRS, less are upheld,...”
    3 days ago by just an opinion
  • KiwiSaver value for money not set and forget
    “"Has the benchmark-relative excess return - accounting for the fee - held up?" Shouldn't the question be "Has the benchmark-relative...”
    4 days ago by myrealname
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com