About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, September 17th, 1:27PM
Latest Headlines

Hanover responds

Hanover has taken the unusual step of responding to a series of newspaper articles critical of its business.

Friday, February 15th 2008, 1:40PM
The company says it generally prefers to deal directly with advisors and investors, rather than commenting through the media.

However, it says "the National Business Review and the Independent have recently published misleading information about our business, we feel it is important to set the record straight on a number of the key issues."

It says it is extraordinary that there is criticism of its funding line with Fortress.

"We consider it prudent practice to have additional standby funding lines at our disposal in the event of adverse wider market conditions such as we have recently seen.

"In essence, this arrangement enables Hanover Finance to access funds by selling certain loans to a Fortress funded Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). The funding from Fortress is secured over those loans not any assets of Hanover Finance. This alternate funding arrangement was developed in conjunction with Hanover Finance's trustee and is just another tool that Hanover Finance can use to manage its liquidity profile.

Hanover is surprised it "had the 'temerity' to pay dividends to its shareholders out of profits earned…despite this being a normal business practice."

It says the board decides what it requires in terms of cash and equity and any surplus will be distributed to its parent as a dividend.

"In 2007, following the usual assessment of capital requirements, the majority of the profits were distributed as a dividend to Hanover Financial Services Limited. The profits that were retained increased Hanover Finance's capital ratio from 10.35% to 11.41%."

It says that in the previous year all of the profits were left in the business in order to fund expansion.

Hanover defends its related party loans.

"Related party loans have always been integral to Hanover as we are both a financier of property and a property development and management company."

All loans to related parties require the approval of the board and are otherwise subject to similar loan approval processes, as loans to third parties including the taking of security where appropriate, Hanover says.

"We are mindful of continuing market feedback though and are actively looking to reduce the value of related party loans over time. This process has already begun and we will report progress during our regular accounting reporting cycle."

"It is somewhat disheartening that Hanover is being criticised for voluntarily undertaking the rigorous and expensive process of obtaining an international credit rating.

Hanover Finance's long-term rating is only a notch below investment grade at BB+, and it pays a higher interest rate, which is entirely in keeping with a slightly higher risk as perceived by the rating agency's research.

It should be noted that the key reason given by the rating agency for not according Hanover Finance an Investment Grade rating of BBB- is that the company focuses exclusively on one area of asset funding (property assets).

Hanover says the current market environment is, without doubt, extremely tough. However, Hanover Finance remains in a solid position with a well managed, profitable business backed by experienced management and shareholders.

"It is frustrating that Hanover Finance is subject to unwarranted rumours and conjecture, but that seems to be the price that comes with being one of the country's largest and most successful finance companies."

« Strategic reports increased interim profitNumeria Finance investors get estimate of returns »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 2.00  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Insurer response 'not good enough'
    “Last year didn't Adrian Orr supervise the purchase a controlling interest in Fidelity Life. And before he went off to the...”
    1 hour ago by Elephant1
  • Insurer response 'not good enough'
    “Full disclosure – I’m not an adviser and know nothing about the insurance industry. However, I am intrigued at @Ron Floods...”
    2 hours ago by Pragmatic
  • Anti-commission advocate appointed to FMA board
    “Seandnz, right on the money. Im gobsmacked that she should be recruited to the FMAS with her clearly biased views. Will there...”
    3 hours ago by Bikedude
  • Insurer response 'not good enough'
    “As expected, commission is the root of all evil, someone working on commission is conflicted, while someone on a salary with...”
    4 hours ago by lewiboy
  • Anti-commission advocate appointed to FMA board
    “So does that mean ALL commission based businesses should move to fee based ie real estate, car sales, if not then it is purely...”
    4 hours ago by perryb
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News


Most Commented On
News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com