About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 13th, 10:03PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Marchmont keeps mum on identity; Stalls on Strategic queries

UPDATED: Marchmont Securities Trust, which is offering investors in Strategic Finance as little as 10 cents in the dollar for the debenture stock, is refusing to divulge any details about itself and has stalled on answering questions about the offer.

Wednesday, January 27th 2010, 4:29PM 3 Comments

by Paul McBeth

Amy Hutton, a partner at RA Fraser & Associates which is acting for Marchmont, told Depositrates.co.nz that "the trustee requires that we keep his name and details of the trust confidential". Questions faxed to her office have been passed on to the trustee, she said.

Strategic, which is currently under review from its trustee after it twice breached the terms of its moratorium arrangement, apologised to investors for the Marchmont offer.

Marchmont is seeking Strategic debentures up to a face value of $5 million, and said the offer will be accepted on a "first come, first served" basis until the close of business on February 3.

Strategic chief executive Kerry Finnigan sent out a letter to investors apologising to them for "any distress or concern" the offer may have caused, but was advised that it was required by law to provide RA Fraser with a copy of its stock register when the agency requested it last October.

"The board of Strategic Finance wishes to make it very clear that it had no knowledge of such an offer and does not endorse or support it in any way," Finnigan said in his letter.

The information was provided "on the basis that it was not to be used to either solicit business, or to communicate with our clients in a manner which could give rise to a breach of the Privacy Act 1993".

Hutton said the offer was sent by the trust, and she could not answer whether Marchmont's letter contravened this assurance.

Strategic sparked a review event when it missed its first payment to debenture holders earlier this month, and prompted a second event when it increased its provisions and write-offs for bad debt to $106 million in the first half of the 2010 financial year.

The finance company, which owes investors some 15,000 investors about $325 million, sparked its first review event after it missed making its initial payment to debenture holders on January 7, though it was successful in repaying its $25 million facility with the Bank of Scotland.

Meanwhile the Securities Commission has put out a “warning” and said debenture-holders “should be wary” of the Marchmont offer.

It says when a finance company is in moratorium it is very difficult to accurately assess the value of the company’s debentures.

“The fact that someone is willing to pay 10c in the dollar does not mean that this is the true value of the securities,” commission chairman Jane Diplock says.

Strategic’s trustee, Perpetual Trust, says the offer “may seriously undervalue the amount that investors could otherwise receive from Strategic.”

“Perpetual considers that the Marchmont offer is likely to seriously undervalue the amount of each investor’s investment in Strategic,” its head of corporate trust business Matthew Lancaster says.

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« SFO finance company investigations – too late? Geneva Finance to lose its wholesale funding »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 27 January 2010 at 8:14 pm Silver said:
Just another example of parasites that live among our financial systems, no ethics no moral fibre & totally non product for the country.
On 28 January 2010 at 10:40 pm Joan said:
So how did this Marchmont get access to our investment details? What happened to the privacy act? Someone needs to answer t5his question.
On 2 February 2010 at 8:28 am LPL said:
On the basis that the information was supplied as follows:

[The information was provided "on the basis that it was not to be used to either solicit business, or to communicate with our clients in a manner which could give rise to a breach of the Privacy Act 1993".]

One now has to wonder who will be addressing this issue? It has clearly been breached.

Given the drive to a new regulatory framework and better protection for investors I think the outcome of this will be indicative of the future (for better or worse).

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 1.75  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com