About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, November 18th, 2:22PM
Latest Headlines

Bridgecorp directors front up in court

The directors of failed finance company Bridgecorp heard the charges against them at a depositions hearing in the Auckland District Court today.

Monday, February 15th 2010, 9:18PM

by Paul McBeth

Through his lawyer, non-executive director Peter Steigrad accepted there was a prima facie case to answer, and he will go to trial, according to an NZ Herald report. The directors, including Rod Petricevic, Rob Roest, Gary Urwin and chairman Bruce Davidson each face 10 charges alleging false prospectuses were used in 2006.

Securities Commission prosecutor Brian Dickey told the court the finance company was "in a freefall of deteriorating circumstances" when it issued the prospectus containing false information, and outlined the dates when Bridgecorp missed making its payments.

Dickey said if the prospectus had been accurate people would have been unlikely to invest in the company.

The hearing is expected to last at least a week.

Bridgecorp collapsed in 2007 owing some 14,500 investors about $460 million, with about $100 million tied up in a failed property development in Fiji.

Last year, the Companies Office banned Petricevic and Roest from holding any directorships, and Petricevic was also bankrupted.

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« Rates Round UpRBNZ’s liquidity measures no problem for SCF: Maier »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 1.75  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • FMA fesses up to website breach and apologises
    “@LNF I was specifically speaking to the word not the mandatory. So not misunderstanding, more a crack at the culture that...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@tash, as insane as it sounds, yes. The mishmash of rules around this basically say you both need to keep records of who...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “wow ..... looks like advisers have to watch out for booby traps. do clients need to have any responsibilities? who do...”
    3 days ago by w k
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News


Most Commented On
News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com