tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, December 5th, 7:44PM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

Former Justice Ministers prosecuted over Lombard offer documents

Doug Graham and Bill Jeffries, both former Justice Ministers, plus two other Lombard directors facing charges

Wednesday, April 14th 2010, 6:33AM 1 Comment

by Paul McBeth

Former Justice Minister and Attorney-General Doug Graham has been charged by the Securities Commission, which he once oversaw, in civil proceedings relating to failed finance company Lombard Finance & Investments (LFI).

Bill Jeffries, also a former Justice Minister, and two other Lombard directors, Michael Reeves and Lawrence Bryant all face prosecution.

"The commission alleges that Lombard Finance & Investments' offer documents misled investors by misrepresenting the investment risks, especially in relation to liquidity, the quality of the loan book, adherence to credit policies, and the company's overall financial position," said chair Jane Diplock in a statement.

The regulator claims the directors made false statements in a prospectus dated September 7, 2007 and investments statements dated December 28, 2007. It also alleges that a DVD advertisement distributed in 2007 and 2008 repeated similar untrue claims about the company's financial position.

Graham, who had oversight of the Securities Commission in the 1990's, issued a statement on behalf of the directors disputing the allegations and claiming no one raised any issues with the board at the time.

"The prospectus was prepared by management, commented on by the auditors and solicitors then accepted by the Companies Office. The document was sent to the Trustee. None of these advised the board of any concerns with the final wording," Graham said. "I must record my dismay that it has taken two-and-a-half years to make the allegations and am very disappointed the commission has never raised with me any concerns it had over the prospectus prior to filing proceedings."

It was unknown how many investors who invested $8.5 million through the three-month period had relied on the prospectus

At the time of the prospectus, the company's trustee was Perpetual Trust, which ultimately sent it to the receivers, its auditor was KPMG, and its solicitor was DLA Phillips Fox.

The Securities Commission is seeking civil liability and pecuniary penalties of up to $500,000 from each director, and is continuing its investigations in relation to LFI and its parent company, Lombard Group, now known as Insured Group.

The parent company, which successfully completed its acquisition of Australian Consolidated Insurance as part of a reverse-takeover, says the proceedings will not impact on it after it separated out its ownership of LFI to a holding company and wrote off the value of its shareholding.

"The proceedings are part of the history of Lombard, which shareholders in the listed company have left behind as the company moves into its new future as a substantial participant in the insurance broking business in Australasia," managing director Wayne Miller said.

 

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« SCF first-half loss nudges $200 millionSouth Canterbury Finance guarantee comes in nick of time »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 14 April 2010 at 10:13 am Mike Shaw said:
Sir Doug has a valid point, the Securities Commission ought to have been aware of the problems when the documents were filed and at a minimum made potential investors aware of the problem. But alas the govenment has not given the Sec Com any powers to act before a potential default occurs.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “@Backstage, thanks. I agree there is no relationship to CoFI, though, from a service perspective, I have two other providers...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Partners Life has decided to stop using its COM for advisers as it believes the system may breach the CoFI regulations which...”
    2 days ago by Amused
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Insurance companies should stick to their lane. They are not advisers and even those that employ advisers should not be crossing...”
    2 days ago by Tash
  • [GRTV] The nitty gritty of Smart’s ETFs
    “Advisors should consider all gateways into investment markets including cheaply priced ETFs to provide access to low priced...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • DRS member or not - client care remains advisers’ responsibility
    “FAPs are members of DRS too. Substitute “adviser” for “FAP” and the story is actually a lot more accurate. If...”
    3 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com