About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 19th, 4:49PM
Latest Headlines

Corporates chase South Canterbury money

It's probably no coincidence there's a rush of corporate debt issues hitting the market just as South Canterbury Finance (SCF) investors are about to receive their cheques.

Wednesday, October 20th 2010, 10:31PM 1 Comment

by Jenny Ruth

Casino operator Sky City Entertainment Group is the latest, offering to sell up to $50 million of its capital notes held as treasury stock.

Sky acquired the notes earlier this year when it rolled over a previous capital note issue for another five years while giving investors the choice of having them redeemed. At August 19, it was holding just under 103 million notes as treasury stock.

The notes, maturing on May 15, 2015 are being offered at 7.25% per annum, the same rate the listed notes last traded at on NZX.

Trans Tasman food giant Goodman Fielder is seeking to sell up to $250 million in bonds maturing May 16, 2016 at a minimum 7.25% interest rate in an offer opening next Monday.

Trans Tasman newspaper publisher APN News & Media is also proposing to sell up to $200 million of bonds maturing in about five years. While it hasn't indicated any interest rate, market sources say it will be above 7%.

So would the SCF investors be interested in any of these? Since all three issuers are solid corporates with reasonable balance sheets owning well-known brands, chances are all will sell well, even without SCF money.

The Greenstone Energy Finance issue which closed last month raised $147 million, $47 million of that in over-subscriptions.

Greenstone, the joint venture between Infratil and the Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation which owns the former Shell petrol stations, 17.1% of the New Zealand Refining Company and 25% of Fly Buys, sold the bonds at 7.35% and they last traded at 7.1%

So which is best of the latest three offerings? Sky City is the only company of the three with a credit rating, just scraping into investment grade with "BBB-" from Standard & Poor's, but the notes themselves aren't rated.

On the downside, Sky's notes are subordinated, ranking behind the company's banks whereas both the Goodman and APN issues will rank equally with the banks. If one has to choose between a subordinated or senior bond, both bearing the same interest rate, the senior bond ought to be more attractive.

Then again, the "AAA"-rated Rabobank has a 6.7% five-year term deposit on offer. While investors in all three of these corporate offerings will have the benefit of being able to sell on market before maturity, are the interest rates being offered compensating them adequately for the additional risks?

« [BREAKING NEWS] SFO to investigate SCF transactionsSmartpay looks to issue preference shares »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 21 October 2010 at 7:53 pm Stuart Mason said:
All of these bonds, only one of which is rated investment grade, are absolutely not worth the investment risks, considering they are only paying 0.5% above Westpac for a 5 year term. Thats $500 per year on a $100K investment before tax. Wise up New Zealand! Haven't your fingers been burnt enough or are you just bank -adverse ?
Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 1.75  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    2 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    2 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News


Most Commented On
News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com