tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, December 9th, 2:15PM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

The charges against: Nathans Finance

The following is details of the case referred by Securities Commission to National Enforcement Unit of Ministry of Economic Development for prosecution against Nathans Finance directors  

Friday, December 3rd 2010, 6:02PM

Nathans Finance collapsed on August 20, 2007. It provided funding to listed company VTL.

Nathans directors include a life member of the Institute of Financial Advisers and a relation of Haover director Mark Hotchin.

 

The case is due to be heard in the High Court on March 14, 2011.

Defendants

John Hotchin, Donald Young, Kenneth Moses and Mervyn Doolan

Charges

The Commission alleges that the directors made untrue statements in the registered prospectus and investment statement of Nathans Finance NZ Limited (in receivership) dated 13 December 2006. These statements concern lending to related parties (including Nathans' parent company VTL Group), that Nathans had no bad debts, that it had adequate liquidity, that its lending was diversified, that it made loans and managed them in accordance with robust policies and processes, and that all material matters had been disclosed in the prospectus.

The Commission also alleges that the directors made further untrue statements when they signed a prospectus extension certificate on 30 March 2007.  These stated that the company's financial position had not materially and adversely changed since its last balance date, and that the 13 December 2006 prospectus was not false or misleading.

In addition, the Commission alleges that letters sent to members of the public advertising Nathans Finance debenture stock contained untrue statements about some of the matters referred to above.  These claims do not apply to Mr Hotchin who had resigned his directorship by the time the advertisements were sent out.

The Defendants deny the charges.

Penalties

Criminal charges - These charges are laid indictably under section 58 of the Securities Act and carry a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or fines of up to $300,000 plus $10,000 for every day the offence is continued.

Civil proceedings - The proceedings are issued under section 55C and related sections of the Securities Act.  The Commission has applied for declarations of civil liability and civil pecuniary penalties of up to $500,000 against each of the five directors. 

Date filed

Criminal charges - filed on 12 December 2008 in the District Court at Auckland.

Civil proceedings - filed on 12 December 2008 in the High Court at Auckland.  

Current status

Criminal charges - High Court trial set down for 15 March 2011 (8 weeks) by Judge alone.  Pre-trial hearing took place on 29 November.

Civil proceedings - stayed pending resolution of the criminal case.

 

« RBNZ grants exemptions to finance companiesThe charges against: Bridgecorp »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com