About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Sunday, January 19th, 11:09AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Former Hanover investors' interest in Allied Farmers to be slashed

The former Hanover debenture holders who converted their investment into Allied Farmers' shares in December 2009 are facing their ownership of the company being slashed from 93.6% to possibly less than about 33% by mid-November.

Thursday, October 6th 2011, 4:26PM 6 Comments

by Jenny Ruth

In light of their already massive losses - whether Allied Farmers is worth anything now is questionable - the Hanover investors are unlikely to be happy Allied Farmers' directors collected $802,388 in fees, including the $634,866 paid to now departed managing director Rob Alloway, up from the $558,772 directors collected the previous year.

Allied Farmers' annual report also shows it has reached a settlement with Hanover over a $5 million disputed payment. Hanover has foregone payment in exchange for Allied Farmers admitting its various adverse statements about Hanover's conduct "were without merit and unproven."

Allied Farmers has made an unspecified contribution towards Hanover's legal and settlement costs and says the terms are confidential.

The report shows those who held Allied Farmers' shares before the Hanover transaction will be issued a further 118.1 million shares to reflect the shortfall of the value of the Hanover assets valued at $396.2 million in December 2009. The assets were valued at $110 million at June 30 last year and Allied Farmers has written off a further $34.1 million in its latest report.

As well, the institutions who invested $2.25 million in 90 million Allied Farmers shares at 2.5 cents per share through a share placement in August last year are entitled to a further 977.4 million new shares because of the precipitous fall in Allied Farmers' net tangible assets since then.

However, there's a catch: NZX listing rules don't allow the company to issue more than 20% extra shares in any one year without shareholder approval. That means it can issue only 390.6 million to those institutions now and is asking shareholders to vote in favour of issuing the remainder at the annual meeting on November 29.

The report doesn't say whether there will be any consequences if shareholders vote against issuing the remaining shares. If they vote against issuing the new shares, the Hanover investors' interest in Allied Farmers will fall to 74.9%; if they agree to the remaining shares being issued, their holding will fall to 60.9%.

It is inevitable their interest will be further diluted because Allied Farmers has $12.6 million of capital notes maturing in mid-November. The company says the notes' trustee wouldn't agree to any alternative proposals, leaving it no option but to convert the notes into equity.

The notes will convert at a 5% discount to the weighted average share price over the 20 business days before the November 15 maturity date. If the notes were converted at the current 0.4 cents share price, noteholders would receive 3.15 billion shares, taking Allied Farmers' shares on issue to 5.7 billion, assuming shareholders vote in favour of issuing shares to the placement shareholders.

The note conversion will have the benefit of turning Allied Farmers' negative $5.5 million equity at June 30 (down from the previously reported $6.4 million negative equity as a result of post-balance sheet events) into positive territory.

Unsurprisingly, Allied Farmers' auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, has cast doubt on whether Allied Farmers continues to be a going concern which depends on "the generation of sufficient future cash flows, the ability to source new funding, and the remediation of the group's negative equity position."

One key to the company's continued existence is the support of the receiver of its former finance company, Allied Nationwide Finance, to which Allied Farmers owed $19 million at June 30.

« Treasury should have limited finance company deposits: AGHeartland to repay Wrightson bond, contemplates another issue »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 7 October 2011 at 9:47 am Ivan said:
Why did Hanover investors ever think that this was going to be a good deal for them. Its the 24.55 percent of investors who had the good sense to vote against it that I feel sorry for.
On 7 October 2011 at 11:19 am deb said:
I didn't ever think it was going to be a good deal and voted against, then sold up and got out as fast as I could. Still lost out but not as much as I would have if I'd stayed put.
On 10 October 2011 at 3:13 pm Deirdre Elliott said:
Truly a swindle from start to finish. The Hanover chiefs are of course still laughing all the way to the bank while those of us who have lent them the means to their greed and ostentation are left with nothing.
On 17 October 2011 at 10:50 am margaret mccoll said:
As an 86 year old widow who has lost approx 80 thousand dollars and voted against the transfer I wanted to help members of my family that need help but can do nothing for them.
On 3 January 2012 at 3:25 pm G.Douglas said:
I have only just found about our substantial loss.I had no idea that this had taken place. I was not written to and told what had taken place. The amount taken by directors and departing Manager is disgusting. I hope they enjoy there retirement as much as I am only having the National supper. Have a happy new year.
On 25 January 2012 at 1:37 pm John said:
Yep. They keep adding insult to injury. At some point the law has to catch up with these people and award them a long holiday on the state. Meanwhile the pain and suffering continue for all the ordinary investors.Those responsible for this mess including those that were at Hanover need to know we won't be going away.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 1.75  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Partners Life criticises Vitality
    “bay broker good points but I get the point about premiums increasing when sick. I have Vitality personally and I have qualified...”
    3 days ago by taka dan
  • Don't hold your breath for life insurance reform
    “That's a good observation from @JPHale there. "2% of sales" has even less meaning when you don't know if it's 2% of premiums...”
    3 days ago by Denis
  • Partners Life criticises Vitality
    “I've added Vitaltiy to a number of clients' new covers. I have also sold AIA cover without it. As with all advice it is...”
    3 days ago by BayBroker
  • Don't hold your breath for life insurance reform
    “Having read both the article and the comments I can only agree with what has been said in the comments. Further, I am...”
    3 days ago by BayBroker
  • David Whyte's 5 predictions for 2020
    “@ number 2: LOL - don't hold your breath. And besides, even if they did do it, if someone needs it they should probably already...”
    4 days ago by All hat no cattle
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com