About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 19th, 9:29AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Judge discharges order against Mike Pero

Mike Pero has scored a small victory in his long-running legal battle against the current owners of the mortgage advisory firm that bears his name.

Thursday, August 23rd 2018, 6:00AM

by Miriam Bell

The latest instalment of court proceedings in Mike Pero Mortgages Ltd (MPM) vs Mike Pero and Mike Pero Real Estate hit the Auckland High Court last week.

Justice Alisa Duffy presided over two days of debate over whether or not a hearing scheduled for early September should be adjourned.

As part of that hearing, Pero’s lawyers requested that a 2017 charging order, which directed that Pero pay a debt of $2.5 million to Mike Pero Real Estate (MPRE), be discharged.

This was because Pero repaid the total sum owed in June. He expected that a discharging of the order would follow.

However, MPM would not agree to the discharge of the order and so Pero applied to the court to have the order discharged.

In court, MPM’s lawyers staunchly opposed the discharge of the charging order because of alleged behaviour on the part of Pero, which MPM has now filed separate legal proceedings over.

This week Justice Duffy released her judgment on this particular matter.

She says that MPM’s complaints are no more than unproven allegations and judgment is yet to be given on them.

When it came to the matter of the charging order, payment of the judgment sum extinguished liability for those complaints.

Justice Duffy says that while MPM may view the conduct underlying those complaints as ongoing, this is something that is presently unproven.

“And insofar as the plaintiff has fresh complaints to bring against the first and second defendants, once again such complaints are unproven.

“Until the allegations are successfully proved and a sealed judgment to that effect is issued, such allegations cannot support a charging order being granted without leave of the Court.”

That means there is no basis for MPM to keep the 2017 charging order alive and MPM’s refusal to agree to its discharge is without foundation, she says.

“Indeed, for the reasons already given, such refusal is unreasonable, oppressive and an abuse of this Court’s process.”

Justice Duffy says that MPM is in no position to bargain about the discharge of the charging order and now that MPRE has been repaid in full there is no basis for the charging order to remain in force.

“Accordingly, I am satisfied there is no proper basis for the opposition to the application to discharge the charging order. It follows that this order is discharged.”

To date, Justice Duffy has not released a decision on whether the proceedings currently set down for September will be adjourned or not.

Read more:

Mike Pero v MPM $2.5 mill debt fight back in court 

Mike Pero v Mike Pero companies – the battle continues 

Tags: financial advisers Mike Pero mortgages

« Non-bank lenders go dating advisersFMA referred fraudster “broker” to IRD »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    21 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    21 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    2 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    2 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 4.05 3.95 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.55 3.45 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.04 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 15 November 2019 4:16pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com