About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, July 29th, 12:49PM
rss
Investment News

How the Govt cut the Retirement Commissioner's funding

Official papers show how the Government wanted to reduce the ORC's funding, although officials argued a different case.

Tuesday, June 19th 2001, 10:40PM

by Philip Macalister

Although officials consider adequate funding the Office of the Retirement Commissioner (ORC) is important for the government in terms of its savings policies it has had its income reduced.

Officials argue, in papers released to Good Returns, that one of the risks of reduced funding to the ORC is that the public may perceive that NZ Superannuation will provide the only retirement income necessary.

As Finance Minister Michael Cullen has repeatedly pointed out NZ Super will only provide a very basic income.

In the lead up to this year's Budget round several funding options were considered, however it is clear the Minister of Social Services Steve Maharey had no intention of increasing funding, or replacing previous private sector funding.

At one point earlier this year the Government sought to shift much of the ORC's funding to the private sector.

The current situation is that in the last financial year the ORC received a total of $4.78 million. Of this $2.8 million is time-limited funding for its education and information campaign. This $2.8 million contribution ceases on June 30.

Over recent years the private sector has provided additional funding for the campaign. Originally 10 companies provided $100,000 annually each, however none of them now contribute funds.

Officials suggested three options for future funding of the education campaign, namely $1.7 mill, $2.8 mill and $3.9 mill.

  • Option 1: $1.7 million funding would result in a significantly reduced education programme compared to present levels.
  • Option 2: $2.8 million would have allowed the continuation of the office's programmes, albeit at a level less than recent levels owing to the decline in private sector funding.
  • Option 3: $3.9 mill would allow for a higher impact programme compared to options 1 and 2.

Officials, late last year, went for option 2 as it would allow the ORC to keep up its presence, plus it would provide some incentive for the ORC to seek private sector funding.

Social Services minister Steve Maharey, in November, agreed with option 2 then asked his officials to do more work on options for private sector funding.

These ranged from voluntary contributions through to the introduction of a compulsory levy.

The voluntary option was essentially a continuation of the original private sector funding model. However, a variation on this approach was to suggest that the Investment Savings and Insurance Association develop a levy for its members, in the same way organisations fund the Insurance and Savings Ombudsman.

The whole scheme was sold to the industry as a "partnership" between Government and industry.

As reported earlier the industry did not want a bar of this partnership approach.

The idea of a compulsory level threw up far more problems for the Government.

First up it would take up to 10 months to make the necessary changes to the law, therefore funding wouldn't be available immediately.

Secondly, there were difficulties working out how to calculate the levy, and who should be levied.

For instance it was argued real estate agents and the forestry industry form part of the savings industry.

Likewise should all oragnisations pay an equal amount or should it be based on some other criteria such as funds under management?

Later that month officials prepared papers on further options which included, disestablishment of the ORC, Baseline funding only and Require Private Sector Contributions.

By January officials suggested that the minister should try and get sufficient funding from industry to pay all of the ORC's education campaign. They noted that the level of contributions might be greater than what the industry used to pay.

The only positive benefit, from the Government's point of view, regarding disestablishing the ORC, was that it would then have "increased funds available for reprioritisation."

Going against the idea was the fact that the ORC had been successful, that it carried out statutory functions, such as the six-yearly periodic reporting, there would be a policy gap and that some of its work would have to be done by other organisations.

On top of that such a move would send the wrong message to the public.

Similar arguments were made about providing the ORC with baseline funding only.

"In general, reduced awareness will result in less voluntary savings, with related flow on economic, social and governmental costs."

Officials pointed out to the minister that there were significant risks with getting the private sector to pay for the ORC's education campaign.

These included the Government losing credibility, the industry hi-jacking the campaign, and the industry and the ORC not having the same precise aim.

The best way for many people to save is to reduce debt, yet many lenders are also involved in the long-term savings industry and may not want to promote such a message.

Also, private sector funding could taint the message and the ORC could lose its independence.

At the end of the process the Government has disenfranchised the industry, plus in the attempt to save less than $2 million has seriously muted the important messages which the ORC has consistently delivered to the public.

This is despite the fact that it was provided with plenty of evidence from officials that the ORC has, on a meagre budget, been successful in promoting the need to save for retirement.

You can read Philip's blog here: http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/blog/

« Opinions still divided about online brokingKing builds an empire »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend

Good Returns Investment Centre is bought to you by:

Subscribe Now

Keep up to date with the latest investment news
Subscribe to our newsletter today

Edison Investment Research
  • Worldwide Healthcare Trust
    23 July 2015
    Sector specialist continues to outperform
    Worldwide Healthcare Trust (WWH) offers broad exposure to the global healthcare sector, including investments in healthcare services and medical devices...
  • Aberdeen New Dawn Investment Trust
    23 July 2015
    Keeping its fundamental focus
    Aberdeen New Dawn Investment Trust (ABD) is a diversified Asia-Pacific fund investing in companies across the Asian region, including Australia but excluding...
  • European Assets Trust
    21 July 2015
    Growth and yield from small-cap specialist
    European Assets Trust (EAT) is a concentrated portfolio of small and midcap European companies, chosen for their capital appreciation potential. The manager...
  • The Merchants Trust
    13 July 2015
    UK equity ‘best ideas’ with 5% dividend yield
    The Merchants Trust (MRCH) is a concentrated portfolio of mainly larger UK companies, with a focus on producing a high income along with capital and income...
  • The Bankers Investment Trust
    13 July 2015
    Global growth with growing income
    The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR) is a global investment trust that aims to deliver capital growth in excess of the return on the FTSE All-Share index,...
  • Henderson Far East Income
    13 July 2015
    High-yield Asian specialist with growth potential
    Henderson Far East Income (HFEL) has a high yield (c 6%) and a focus on achieving total returns from a portfolio spread across the Asia Pacific region,...
© 2015 Edison Investment Research.

View more research papers »

Today's Best Bank Rates
TSB Bank 4.00  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
Cash PIE Rates

Cash Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ 2.50    2.67    2.79
ASB Bank 2.15    2.23    2.33
ASB Bank 2.35    2.43    2.54
ASB Bank 2.40    2.48    2.60
ASB Bank 2.45    2.54    2.65
ASB Bank 2.50    2.59    2.70
BNZ 2.65    2.75    2.88
Direct Broking Call Account 2.80    2.92    3.05
Heartland Bank 3.35    3.44    3.60
Kiwibank 2.40    2.50    2.61
Kiwibank 3.15    3.29    3.44
Nelson Building Society 3.75    3.90    4.08
RaboDirect 2.80    2.91    3.04
SBS Bank 3.00    3.12    3.26
TSB Bank 3.50    3.63    3.80
Westpac 2.45    2.54    2.65
Westpac 0.10    0.10    0.11
Westpac 3.60    3.75    3.92

Term Funds

Institution Rate 33% 39%
ANZ Term Fund - 90 days 3.00    3.08    3.22
ASB Bank Term Fund - 90 days 3.25    3.34    3.49
ASB Bank Term Fund - 6 months 3.80    3.90    4.08
ASB Bank Term Fund - 12 months 4.30    4.18    4.37
ASB Bank Term Fund - 18 months 4.40    4.28    4.48
ASB Bank Term Fund - 2 years 4.15    4.34    4.53
ASB Bank Term Fund - 5 years 4.30    4.50    4.70
ASB Bank Term Fund - 9 months 3.85    4.02    4.20
BNZ Term PIE - 120 days 3.65    3.75    3.92
BNZ Term PIE - 150 days 3.65    3.75    3.92
BNZ Term PIE - 5 years 4.50    4.60    4.81
BNZ Term PIE - 2 years 4.25    4.37    4.56
BNZ Term PIE - 18 months 4.15    4.23    4.42
BNZ Term PIE - 12 months 4.10    4.20    4.39
BNZ Term PIE - 9 months 4.00    4.18    4.37
BNZ Term PIE - 6 months 3.90    4.08    4.26
BNZ Term PIE - 90 days 3.35    3.44    3.60
Co-operative Bank PIE Term Fund - 6 months 4.00    4.11    4.30
Heartland Bank Term Deposit PIE - 12 months 3.95    4.13    4.32
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 90 days 3.30    3.38    3.53
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 6 months 3.75    3.85    4.02
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 12 months 4.10    4.20    4.41
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 150 days 3.60    3.70    3.86
Kiwibank Term Deposit Fund - 120 days 3.30    3.38    3.53
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 12 months 3.80    3.91    4.08
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 6 months 3.70    3.81    3.98
RaboDirect Term Advantage Fund - 90 days 3.30    3.39    3.55
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 150 days 3.60    3.70    3.87
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 120 days 3.50    3.60    3.76
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 18 months 4.05    4.16    4.35
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 12 months 4.00    4.11    4.30
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 6 months 3.75    3.86    4.03
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 9 months 3.70    3.81    3.98
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 90 days 3.35    3.44    3.60
Westpac Term PIE Fund - 2 years 4.15    4.27    4.46
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com