tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 6th, 9:36AM

Special Report

rss
Current Special Report

Taking the rough with the smooth

The case for performance based fees - Rob Hosking weighs up the pros and cons.

Wednesday, August 20th 2003, 1:56PM

by Rob Hosking

The case for performance based fees - Rob Hosking weighs up the pros and cons.

The “heads I win/tails you lose” nature of the relationship between fund managers and investors has long been the source of much investor teeth-grinding.

The long bear market has caused the issue to come to the fore yet again. Investors are asking, if their investment has lost money, then why are the fund managers getting paid bonuses?

It’s a fair question. Some fund manager firms are replying that if, say, a fund made a loss of 6% and the market went down 12%, the manager still beats the market – and is entitled to a bonus. The problem for the investor of course is that if the return has still gone down by 6%, the money for that bonus has to come from somewhere. And when the music stops, it’s the customer who is left holding the silly parcel.

This has led to a push in some countries for more performance related fees. Here, though, that drive has not been as strong.

“It hasn’t come up at all with the advisers, and managers, that I’ve spoken to,” says FundSource business manager Tim Anderson.

“The only exception is the new St Laurence fund.”

Wellington-based St Laurence group last month launched its new Number One Portfolio Trust, a group of five separate funds which have a minimum level of return. If the returns drop below that ‘floor’, there are no fees.

“We see Number One Portfolio Trust as a way of signaling to investors that we are putting their interests first and not the other way round,” says St Laurence managing director Kevin Podmore.

“It’s fair to say that there aren’t a lot of products and services in the marketplace that have this philosophy, but we’re prepared to back our judgment and put our fee on the line.”

The fund was launched specifically because of investor anger over having to continue to pay fees while portfolios shrink in value, he says.

But so far St Laurence is the only company taking this approach, says Anderson.

However, Anderson says that investors should not make their decision based on management fee structure.

He likens picking an investment based on fees to picking it based on tax – yes, it is an issue, but it should be secondary to the overall strategy.

“There are other, more important issues than fees. They shouldn’t be a pivotal reason why an investor selects a vehicle – they should first consider what their goals are, and whether or not that investment will meet those goals.”

Watson Wyatt’s international arm put out advice on performance fees for fund managers a couple of years ago and, while broadly supportive of the idea, noted the pitfalls.

The pluses are not only that it makes the investor happier, but it also more closely aligns the interests of the investor and the fund manager.

“It also encourages greater realism when the fund manager is setting future return predictions.”

However, they can be complex to administer.

“Other shortcomings are that performance related fees can encourage investment managers to take higher levels of risk in an attempt to boost their fee, and there is also a possibility that short-term market movements may overshadow the true effect of the investment manager's skill.”

Which, in turn, means that any performance related fee needs to be based on the mantra of which wary investors in equities are frequently reminded – you need to focus on the long-term return. Setting a performance related fee based on long-term performance can be tricky – just how long should it be? The Watson Wyatt guidelines suggest three years. They also suggest capping the fee at a level of performance that involves an acceptable level of risk.

There is one final drawback for fund management firms considering performance based fees. Like any other firm, they need to hang on to their best staff. If performance related fees mean fund managers take too big a drop in their expected income, they may move to other firms which do not have such an arrangement.

Rob Hosking is a Wellington-based freelance writer specialising in political, economic and IT related issues.

« St Laurence says: forget feesStrength, stability and service »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous Special Reports

MORE NEWS»

News Bites
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 4.94 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 7.49 ▼5.79 ▼5.49 ▼5.59
ANZ 7.39 6.39 6.19 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 5.79 5.59 5.59
ASB Bank 7.39 ▼5.79 ▼5.49 ▼5.59
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance ▼7.90 - - -
Basecorp Finance ▼8.35 - - -
BNZ - Classic - 5.99 5.69 5.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Mortgage One 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Std 7.44 ▼5.79 ▼5.59 5.69
BNZ - TotalMoney 7.54 - - -
CFML 321 Loans 6.20 - - -
CFML Home Loans 6.45 - - -
CFML Prime Loans 8.25 - - -
CFML Standard Loans 9.20 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 5.69 - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.95 5.79 5.59 5.69
Co-operative Bank - Standard 6.95 6.29 6.09 6.19
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - ▼5.99 ▼5.89 -
First Credit Union Standard ▼7.69 ▼6.69 ▼6.39 -
Heartland Bank - Online 6.99 ▼5.49 ▼5.39 ▼5.45
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 8.60 6.65 6.40 -
ICBC 7.49 ▼5.79 ▼5.59 5.59
Kainga Ora 8.39 7.05 6.59 6.49
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kiwibank 7.25 6.89 6.59 6.49
Kiwibank - Offset 7.25 - - -
Kiwibank Special 7.25 5.99 5.69 5.69
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society 7.94 ▼5.75 ▼5.99 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
SBS Bank 7.49 6.95 6.29 6.29
SBS Bank Special - 6.15 5.69 5.69
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS FirstHome Combo 4.94 5.15 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity 9.75 - - -
TSB Bank 8.19 6.49 ▼6.39 ▼6.39
TSB Special 7.39 5.69 ▼5.59 ▼5.59
Unity 7.64 ▼5.79 ▼5.55 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - 5.49 - -
Wairarapa Building Society ▼7.70 ▼5.95 ▼5.75 -
Westpac 7.39 6.39 6.09 6.19
Westpac Choices Everyday 7.49 - - -
Westpac Offset 7.39 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac Special - 5.79 5.49 5.59
Median 7.49 5.97 5.75 5.69

Last updated: 6 December 2024 9:11am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com