tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, May 1st, 6:50PM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

Strategic Finance liquidation not a fishing expedition, trustee says

Some transactions by Strategic Finance raised question marks for the receiver, and the firm’s liquidation is not a fishing expedition, according to the trustee.

Tuesday, July 27th 2010, 9:09PM

by Paul McBeth

Perpetual Trust's head of corporate trust Matthew Lancaster told depositrates.co.nz there were some transactions that were "more than worthy of scrutiny" and that the liquidators will have greater powers in investigating Strategic's deals leading up to its collapse. After it became clear the receivership would probably find a shortfall for secured creditors, Perpetual decided it was appropriate to call in the liquidators, Lancaster said.

"Some transactions have caught the eye of the receivers," Lancaster said. "It's not just a general order."

Perpetual applied for the order on June 17, and the High Court in Wellington granted the order on July 26. John Cregton and Andrew McKay of Corporate Finance were appointed liquidators. Corporate Finance is liquidating related companies Strategic Equity Partners and Strategic Investment Group.

Receiver John Fisk of PricewaterhouseCoopers said he did not have "very serious concerns" about any transactions at this stage, though if there are any which need to be reviewed, the liquidator has the ability to look at them.

Earlier this year, Commerce Minister Simon Power referred Strategic Finance to the Securities Commission after lobbying from ACT MP John Boscawen, who raised concerns about the status of some of the failed finance company's second-ranking mortgages in Parliament last year.

The liquidation will not have any impact on the receivership, which will continue to grind what it can from the realisation of Strategic's assets, Fisk said.

The sale of the finance company's loan book is continuing, with "several parties doing due diligence" at the moment, he said. Fisk expects to be able to make an announcement regarding a sale in the middle of next month.

Perpetual Trust called in the receiver in March, ending a moratorium arrangement that had been in place since December 2008. The finance company missed its milestone repayment on Jan. 7 after it failed to generate enough loan recoveries, and former chief executive Kerry Finnigan had put a Hanover-style debt-for-equity swap before the trustee in a bid to stave off receivership.

The company's loan book, which is the company's most valuable asset, has a net value of $229.1 million, though the receivers have relied on the figures provided to them. Strategic owes some 11,000 investors about $391.5 million.

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« Government pays out $79 mill to guaranteed depositsHawkins' Budget Loans pleads guilty to misleading investors »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “Yes unfortunately any mortgage business that has their own FAP are still having to go through regulation twice , once for...”
    23 hours ago by valkyrie6
  • AIA revamps its distribution team
    “Best wishes but not sure the relevance of an English football team touring NZ - bringing this up reminds one of a time before...”
    1 day ago by k glynn
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    ““Most FAPs engaged 19 or fewer advisers and the most common business structure was a single-adviser FAP. About half of...”
    1 day ago by Amused
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “I think the findings of: 1.There are fewer complaints to FAPs, and 2.Although higher complaints to DRS, less are upheld,...”
    2 days ago by just an opinion
  • KiwiSaver value for money not set and forget
    “"Has the benchmark-relative excess return - accounting for the fee - held up?" Shouldn't the question be "Has the benchmark-relative...”
    4 days ago by myrealname
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com