tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, May 1st, 6:50PM

Investments

rss
Latest Headlines

Marac gets a bit of a lift from S&P

Standard & Poor's has revised its outlook on Marac lifting its ratings from negative to stable, however has kept its core rating unchanged.

Wednesday, August 11th 2010, 7:33PM

The ratings agency has affirmed its BB+/B issuer credit ratings on the New Zealand finance company.

"The rating affirmation recognizes MARAC's stabilised asset quality position, which had previously come under pressure from the challenging domestic operating environment," Standard & Poor's credit analyst Derryl D'silva said. "The affirmation also reflects MARAC's adequate liquidity position and its supportive capitalization, which has benefited from a capital injection and the sale and transfer of impaired commercial property loans to a related company. Also supporting our rating is MARAC's good market position in the New Zealand finance industry."

Moderating factors are: MARAC operates in higher-risk lending segments; its funding position could be vulnerable to unexpected weakening in its own credit profile or emerging industry pressures; and its earnings are likely to remain under some pressure from ongoing, albeit more-moderate, new loan loss provisioning.

The stable outlook reflects our view that MARAC will maintain a financial profile that supports the ‘BB+' rating. We expect that still-high arrears will continue to trend down and new loan loss provisions will be lower than recently experienced and will not constrain MARAC's future profitability or compromise its capital adequacy position. We also expect MARAC will maintain an adequate liquidity position by retaining the support and confidence of its bankers, and that it will continue to increase the proportion of non-guaranteed debentures to manage its funding position after the extended government guarantee expires in December 2011.

The ratings could be lowered if there were an unexpected increase in provisions and nonperforming assets such that net profits were reduced by more than half. The ratings could also be lowered if any new operational risk events were to emerge that undermined our view of MARAC's risk management framework. The rating could come under pressure if there were a material deterioration in MARAC's liquidity position or if MARAC was unsuccessful in attracting non-guaranteed debenture funding as it approached the expiry of the extended government guarantee on December 31, 2011.

We do not expect to raise the ratings in the short term under the current business model. The most likely scenario for an upgrade would be amalgamation plans that delivered a larger, more-diversified, combined entity with a more supportive overall business and financial profile.

« South Canterbury Finance warns investorsAllied Nationwide rating cut »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 5.25  
Based on a $50,000 deposit
More Rates »
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “Yes unfortunately any mortgage business that has their own FAP are still having to go through regulation twice , once for...”
    13 hours ago by valkyrie6
  • AIA revamps its distribution team
    “Best wishes but not sure the relevance of an English football team touring NZ - bringing this up reminds one of a time before...”
    15 hours ago by k glynn
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    ““Most FAPs engaged 19 or fewer advisers and the most common business structure was a single-adviser FAP. About half of...”
    17 hours ago by Amused
  • What the FAP landscape looks like now
    “I think the findings of: 1.There are fewer complaints to FAPs, and 2.Although higher complaints to DRS, less are upheld,...”
    2 days ago by just an opinion
  • KiwiSaver value for money not set and forget
    “"Has the benchmark-relative excess return - accounting for the fee - held up?" Shouldn't the question be "Has the benchmark-relative...”
    3 days ago by myrealname
Subscribe Now

Deposit Rates newsletter

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com