tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, March 29th, 10:40AM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

AFAs still struggling with requirements: FMA

Authorised financial advisers need to bring their business practices up to standard or face referral to the Financial Advisers Disciplinary Committee, the FMA has warned.

Monday, September 15th 2014, 6:00AM 5 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

It has released its latest monitoring report of AFAs.

It found similar issues to those identified in past reviews, including ABS documents that lacked detail.

Director of compliance Elaine Campbell said: “That’s not to say that they’re universally not getting better. An issue with any new regime is that you expect standards to increase over time. We’re always looking for the best level of communication with clients possible.”

The FMA also noted the need for improved record-keeping, the need to ensure personalised advice suited each individual client and sought to emphasise the requirement of advisers to clearly define clients’ financial goals.

“With the introduction of the revised Code, we urge all advisers to consider their obligations to ensure their business practices, documentation and processes meet, or exceed, the minimum standards. Where we see ongoing or serious instances of non-compliance, or in cases of potential harm to customers, the FMA will continue to exercise its statutory powers. This includes referrals to the Financial Advisers Disciplinary Committee where appropriate,” the FMA said.

It said a number of AFAs were documenting generic principal benefits and risk, rather than making them client-specific. This has been identified as a problem in earlier monitoring reports, too.

Its review of AFAs within QFEs found the bigger organisations had well-structured compliance departments that helped advisers meet their obligations. But there were still concerns.

Advisers who received shares as bonuses could face a conflict of interest concern,  there was confusion around disclosure documents, the scope of service was not always clear, there was a lack of detail around client financial goals and inadequate information was sometimes provided about the risks and benefits of following the adviser’s advice.

Campbell said a key message from the FMA was that paperwork was important for all advisers. “There’s a reason why regulation is underpinned by producing paperwork to put in the hands of clients. It addresses the power asymmetry between advisers and clients.”

She said it enabled clients to go away from a conversation in which they might have felt overwhelmed with information to digest.  “For many people seeking advice, it might be the first time they’ve done that and when you’re placed in that situation, you don’t always remember everything that was discussed.”

It would also help advisers if there were issues in future, she said, if the advice was well documented.

Campbell said the report was intended to help other advisers get their own businesses into order and it was not intended to signal a problem with the industry. “Through this particular monitoring report, there’s nothing that’s going to keep me awake at night.”

You can see the report here: https://www.fma.govt.nz/keep-updated/reports-and-papers/

« Stewart's NZIG gets boostIFA working on pro-bono offering »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 15 September 2014 at 11:17 am CJM said:
I find these monitoring reports so vague as to be of no use.

There is nothing that helps work out what the FMA actually finds good or bad.

For example, where the FMA is finding problems "documenting the client’s financial situation, financial needs, financial goals and tolerance to risk in enough detail" what does it mean?

Is the AFA only writing down the client's name? Or did they write a 14 page analysis but used the wrong font? What did they not do?

I think the FMA needs to start using specific examples in these reports.

Then other AFAs can either say "what a silly AFA that was, I would never do that" or "Hey, what, even THAT is not acceptable".
On 15 September 2014 at 12:54 pm w k said:
@cjm: give fma a call and ask them exactly what they expect / want. (caution: just don't be shock at their response.)
On 15 September 2014 at 2:26 pm Brent Sheather said:
Exactly right CJM. The FMA could add a lot more value here by saying what is or what isn’t acceptable and putting that information in the public arena so that not only would they be correcting the bad behaviour of the people involved they would also be making sure other advisers didn’t make the same mistake. This would also be consistent with the FMA’s transparency objective. Regards Brent
On 16 September 2014 at 9:54 am R1 said:
The 'standards' the FMA continually refers to will only ever be standards when they are clear, concise and documented. Guidelines are not standards they are, as CJM says, vague and open to interpretation and consequently advisors are at much greater risk of getting things wrong. I suggest the FMA people complete a course on Total Quality Management so they know the difference between standards and guidelines. Paying subs to the FMA for the sort of vague terminology and feedback they are providing is not providing the advisors with what is required to ensure consistent, high quality processes & procedures are adopted by all AFAs and we will just continue to get the 'could do better' feedback. Perhaps that suits the FMA?
On 16 September 2014 at 10:00 am R1 said:
For example; why aren't ABS documents a simple template provided by the FMA that each advisor completes for themselves to the standard set by the FMA and held by the FMA. The idea of funding FMA people to audit these documents on site is costly and reactive and stupid. Having a clear, concise and complete ABS surely is something that is part of being a qualified AFA and should be updated regularly with the FMA as changes occur or otherwise confirmed to be accurate annually.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 6.19 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 8.74 7.24 6.79 6.65
ANZ 8.64 7.84 7.39 7.25
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 7.24 6.79 6.65
ASB Bank 8.64 7.24 6.79 6.65
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance 9.15 - - -
Basecorp Finance 9.60 - - -
Bluestone 9.24 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Classic - 7.24 6.79 6.65
BNZ - Green Home Loan top-ups - - - 1.00
BNZ - Mortgage One 8.69 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 8.69 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 8.69 7.84 7.39 7.25
BNZ - TotalMoney 8.69 - - -
CFML Loans 9.45 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 7.04 - -
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 8.40 7.24 6.79 6.65
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Standard 8.40 7.74 7.29 7.15
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - 7.45 7.35 -
First Credit Union Standard 8.50 7.99 7.85 -
Heartland Bank - Online 7.99 6.69 6.45 6.19
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 8.90 7.60 7.40 -
HSBC Premier 8.59 - - -
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 7.85 7.05 6.75 6.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kainga Ora 8.64 7.79 7.39 7.25
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Kiwibank 8.50 8.25 7.79 7.55
Kiwibank - Offset 8.50 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 7.25 6.79 6.65
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society 9.00 7.75 7.35 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
Resimac - LVR < 80% 8.84 ▼8.09 ▼7.59 ▼7.29
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Resimac - LVR < 90% 9.84 ▼9.09 ▼8.59 ▼8.29
Resimac - Specialist Clear (Alt Doc) - - 8.99 -
Resimac - Specialist Clear (Full Doc) - - 9.49 -
SBS Bank 8.74 7.84 7.45 7.25
SBS Bank Special - 7.24 6.85 6.65
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
SBS FirstHome Combo 6.19 6.74 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity 9.95 - - -
Select Home Loans 9.24 - - -
TSB Bank 9.44 8.04 7.55 7.45
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 8.64 7.24 6.75 6.65
Unity 8.64 6.99 6.79 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - - 6.45 -
Wairarapa Building Society 8.60 6.95 6.85 -
Westpac 8.64 7.89 7.49 7.25
Westpac Choices Everyday 8.74 - - -
Westpac Offset 8.64 - - -
Westpac Special - 7.29 6.89 6.65
Median 8.64 7.29 7.32 6.65

Last updated: 28 March 2024 9:42am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com