About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, November 20th, 12:09PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Alpha may become more dominant in low-return environment

Active management could be set to become a lot more important to investors in a low-return environment, one fund manager says.

Thursday, November 3rd 2016, 6:00AM 2 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

Alister van der Maas, managing director of Russell Investment in New Zealand, said there had been a noticeable shift into passive investments over recent years, which started in the early 2000s but had picked up pace again more recently.

But he said with expected returns across all asset classes having dropped,  the importance of the value that alpha could add had been heightened.

“If you are expecting a balanced portfolio to return 5% gross, or 3.5% net, and you could get an additional 2% in alpha from active management of the portfolio, that’s quite a lot in a 5% environment. In a 10% environment it’s not so much. The importance of alpha is higher now that it has been.”

A passive investment strategy could only be expected to track an index, minus fees, he said. But a good active manager should return more.

The trick was picking the right one, he said. It could be a labour-intensive exercise.

“It’s hard to pick a good active manger but if you have a process that you can trust, why wouldn’t you?”

But adviser Brent Sheather dismissed the suggestion.

He pointed to comments from Professor Paul Marsh, of the London Business School, who said low returns would make it hard to sustain asset managers’ fees in the near future.

“The headline in the Financial Times the other day was 99% of active US equity funds underperform’,” he said.

Van der Maas agreed there would be pressure on all fees, including fund manager and adviser fees but he said that was not necessarily an issue that would only apply to active funds.

Tags: Active v Passive

« Call for one AML supervisorLVR restrictions to be reviewed »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 3 November 2016 at 8:40 am Brent Sheather said:
Here is some context around Mr van der Maas comments. Coincidentally the October edition of the Journal of Finance, page 2333, contained a paper by three finance professors from Oxford University. They looked at the success or otherwise of consultants like Mercer, Russell and Towers Watson in choosing fund managers for institutional investors. Their conclusions were scathing – they found that “investment consultants recommendations of funds are largely driven by soft factors (governance, philosophy, process, etc) rather than the funds past performance. However we find no evidence that these recommendations add value suggesting that the search for winners is fruitless.” The reason people can get away with comments like this is that CPD in NZ is pathetic. How many other financial advisors buy the Journal of Finance I wonder? None is my guess. Far easier and more profitable not to think.
On 4 November 2016 at 9:00 am Michael Chamberlain said:
People claim that a volatile environment means you should be active or a low interest rate environment means that you need to be active. The reality is that the arguments do not change. For someone to add value someone else has to lose and the loser is not the passive investor it is another active investor - this is just the maths. The real issue is the "why". Why are you investing and what are the liabilities you are looking to meet. It is therefore a question as to whether the pattern of returns from active or passive is better relative to the why? For most investors, not all, the answer will be passive, but passive does not put food on the table of the active manager or more correctly transfer wealth from the active investor to the active manager!

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    3 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    3 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 4.05 3.95 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.55 3.45 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.04 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 15 November 2019 4:16pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com