About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, August 17th, 12:17AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Advice penalties increase

Financial advisers face much tougher penalties if they breach the rules under the new regulatory regime.

Tuesday, February 13th 2018, 6:00AM 1 Comment

As part of the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Bill, the possible penalties that can be levied on financial advisers are being brought in line with the rest of the Financial Markets Conduct Act.

Financial services lawyer David Ireland said, as a general rule, under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA), the penalty for "serious" breaches worked out at $100,000 for an individual and $300,000 for an entity.

He said, for many situations, the maximum potential penalty had doubled.

"Plus there's a wider range of enforcement powers and some very significant increases in potential penalties for breaches that are seen as the most serious."

Under the FAA, authorised financial advisers who breached their code of conduct duties would face the Financial Advisers Disciplinary Committee, which could recommend cancellation or suspension of authorisation, censure,  supervision or further training and a fine up to $10,000.

Under the FMCA, an individual who breaches their legal duties can face a penalty up to $200,000, and a financial advice provider $600,000.

The new rules also bring in the possibility of jail time for disclosure breaches.

Those who held out that they were able to provide a service they could not could be fined up to $10,000 for an individual under the old rules - now that has increased to $200,000 for an individual.

"It's quite a big jump." Ireland said. "They are the maximum penalties for the most egregious conduct. It gives a signal as to the degree of seriousness of particular offences."

But he said advisers would already have been trying not to commit the offences under the previous regime, so there should be little impact in reality.

Adviser Simon Hassan said penalties were an expected part of any regime, to "keep people on the straight and narrow. In principle they are needed". He said smaller, less well-resourced firms would worry if they were not being applied proportionately.

Another adviser, Brent Sheather, said the penalties would be enough to put a small advice firm out of business. "Probably meaningless too, if the financial advice provider is a corporate with limited liability. Easier to say 'we are bankrupt' and walk away."

Tags: Brent Sheather David Ireland Financial Services Legislation Amendment Bill

« Legg Mason launches fundQuality mark plan raises CFP questions »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 13 February 2018 at 8:19 pm John Milner said:
Is the massive increase in penalties a reflection of the high level of infringing I’m not aware of or is it for the perceived infringing of us cowboys riding into town?

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Shanks meets Faafoi
    “Actually Tash the article only refers to an "Adviser" no mention of what type so we shouldn't assume it's an investment adviser....”
    12 hours ago by gavin austin adviser business compliance
  • Shanks meets Faafoi
    “What adviser? An investment adviser won't help Life advisers and vice versa. Really need two or three advisers on the Code...”
    16 hours ago by Tash
  • Shanks meets Faafoi
    “@Ron Flood, I agree that ideally we SHOULD have presence on the committee. However I question what "balance" would come...”
    17 hours ago by Eyeinthesky
  • Shanks meets Faafoi
    “Eyeinthesky & Pragmatic, I don't agree that it is a lost cause. Having an adviser presence within the committee at this late...”
    19 hours ago by Ron Flood
  • Shanks meets Faafoi
    “Won't someone need to wake up Minister Faafoi. Pretty sure he is fast asleep at the wheel here....”
    19 hours ago by Roderick
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.79 4.99 5.35
ANZ Special - 4.29 4.49 4.85
ASB Bank 5.80 4.69 4.89 5.19
ASB Bank Special - 4.29 4.49 4.79
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.29 4.49 4.85
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.89 5.05 5.49
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 5.45 5.50 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 5.00 5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.79 4.79 5.05 5.29
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.99 4.19 4.69
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.80 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.80 4.69 4.89 5.35
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.80 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.19 4.39 4.85
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.89 4.85 5.05 5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 4.19 4.49 4.85
Sovereign 5.90 4.69 4.89 5.19
Sovereign Special - 4.29 4.49 4.79
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.24 4.49 4.85
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 4.74 4.99 5.35
TSB Bank 5.80 4.74 4.99 5.35
TSB Special - 4.24 4.49 4.85
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 4.99 5.05 5.44
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.29 4.49 4.85
Median 5.89 4.69 4.89 5.19

Last updated: 16 August 2018 6:23pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com