About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Saturday, September 22nd, 4:36PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Advisers: Fee move will make little difference

KiwiSaver investors will soon see the fees they pay displayed in dollar terms - but advisers are not convinced it will have any effect.

Wednesday, March 28th 2018, 5:59AM 6 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

From April 1, fees will have to be made clearer.

If a customer has a balance of $10,000 in their KiwiSaver account, until now they might have seen the fund manager’s fee expressed as 1.28%. That will now be spelled out as $128 per year. According to the KiwiSaver Fund Finder tool on the Sorted website, total fees on $10,000 in a balanced fund range from $52 to $174 per year.

Adviser Stephen O'Connor said that would make fees stand out more to investors.

But he said few people were interested specifically in what their KiwiSaver manager was charging them. They were more interested in the overall return.

"Provided the return is reasonable, given the market, they're not too worried about the fee."

Another adviser, Simon Hassan, agreed it was usually the outcome that mattered.

He made fees clear to clients and explained what they could expect to get in return.

David Beattie, chief investment officer of Booster, said the change would be challenging, from a perception perspective.

Booster's fee includes a component to cover the cost of personalised advice for each client.

"Consumers struggle to ascribe a value to that."

He said the recent long run of strong market returns made it harder for pricier active managers to outperform. But when markets turned, they could be expected to show the benefits of their approach.

Having fees expressed as a dollar figure would lead people to think they were more significant than they were, he said.

Some investors had a mistaken belief that everything in the investment world could be commoditised.

Beattie said fund comparison tools already in the market put an emphasis on fees because other factors were harder to put a value on.

"Transparency is a good thing but it needs to be contextual."

Tags: fees KiwiSaver

« Roboadvice changes open door to new KiwiSaver playerTough quarter for KiwiSaver »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 28 March 2018 at 7:51 am Brent Sheather said:
Yes this is another dumb move from the regulators – more theatrics than action because I suspect the MBIE, who are as usual out of their depth, don’t know how to express fees in a way that makes theoretical sense. Best case, it highlights the problem of having lawyers and people with limited knowledge in charge, worse case it is another example of regulatory capture
On 28 March 2018 at 8:36 am Pragmatic said:
Disclosing fees in both percentage and dollar terms is becoming common practice adopted by regulators globally.

I'm in favour of consumers have all the information visible and available to assist with making informed decisions - even it it leads to some tough conversations around value propositions.
On 28 March 2018 at 11:43 am Ron Flood said:
I never thought, as a mere RFA, I would be commenting on an investment topic but here we go.

The fees charged by KiwiSaver providers is just one small element of an investment strategy yet it has been given a lot of press recently. Some providers are starting to dine out on this and I believe it will confuse consumers rather than enlighten them.

An example of this could be a provider that states, "join our KiwiSaver, we have no annual fees". They transfer a clients $50,000 KiwiSaver to their medium risk fund currently returning 7.8% after tax and fees.

The old provider, who has just seen their client leave, had the client invested in a fund with a similar risk profile that returned 8.35 last year with an annual fee of $180.

By only considering the fees paid, and transferring to a 'nil annual fee' fund, the consumer could be, if the difference in returns continues next year, $80 worse off.

I hope, but won't hold my breath, that the regulators will hammer this point and advise consumers to look at all aspects of their KiwiSaver investment and not just concentrate on annual fees.

Oh, and before I get reminded that in some cases, higher fee charging providers have performed worse than those with lower fees, that is not a reflection of the fees but rather the investment strategies of the provider.

On 28 March 2018 at 11:59 am Ron Flood said:
My error, $70 worse off.
On 28 March 2018 at 1:26 pm Brent Sheather said:
Hi Pragmatic,

It might be correct that disclosing fees in both percentage and dollar terms is becoming common practice but what investors need is useful information ie some perspective – is a 2% annual fee high or low? Is $516 a year in fees fair or not? Mum and dad wouldn't have a clue and to be honest neither fund managers nor the MBIE nor the FMA seem to have any interest in adding to the debate beyond saying "you must read the prospectus" blah blah. What the regulators need to do is say stock markets are priced to return 6% pa so a 2% annual fee extracts one-third of returns or they could say the equity risk premium today is 3.5% so a 3% annual fee delivers the risk of equities with the return of bonds. They could also quote Morningstar and say, all other things being equal, fees are the best lead indicator of relative returns. That they don't either indicates ignorance, regulatory capture or both.

By the way if you are "in favour of consumers having all the information" you will no doubt be concerned that all the fees aren't disclosed in NZ, ie trading costs which can represent an annual impost of 1% pa, are excluded from the MER calculation in NZ. The FMA, unlike the FCA, chooses to ignore this fundamental omission and instead trumpet the non-event of disclosing the dollar value of fees. This whole area needs a good clean out starting with the MBIE and the FMA.
On 28 March 2018 at 3:51 pm Pragmatic said:
In short Brent: yep - don't disagree with what you've suggested

To expand on my comments: full transparency on fees (something that I think we both agree upon) permits the consumer to make an informed decision around "value" that they are receiving (as opposed to the price that they are paying).
A consumer may find that it's acceptable to pay away their equity risk premium for the benefit of receiving a net index return. I don't, but then again there are plenty of consumers who follow celebrity investors in this country to suggest that folks really don't understand that it's the net returns that are most relevant (...without getting into a conversation about gouging, appropriate benchmarks etc)

I also believe that dollar-disclosure permits consumers to understand (and question) the value being provided by other components of the value chain. For example: the concept of providing a 'set & forget' portfolio, with the adviser living off the ongoing revenues will quickly be exposed when the consumer starts questioning value for money.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

News and information about KiwiSaver

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.69 4.85 4.99
ANZ Special - 4.19 4.35 4.49
ASB Bank 5.80 4.59 4.75 4.79
ASB Bank Special - 4.19 4.35 4.39
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.19 4.35 4.49
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.89 5.05 5.25
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 5.45 5.50 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.90 4.95 -
Housing NZ Corp ▲5.80 ▼4.69 ▼4.79 ▼4.79
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.99 4.19 4.69
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.80 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.80 4.69 4.89 5.35
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.80 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.19 4.39 4.85
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.89 4.85 5.05 5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 4.19 4.49 4.85
Sovereign 5.90 4.59 4.75 4.79
Sovereign Special - 4.19 4.35 4.39
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 ▼4.19 ▼4.39 ▼4.49
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 ▼4.69 ▼4.89 ▼4.99
TSB Bank 5.80 4.74 4.79 4.99
TSB Special - 4.24 4.29 4.49
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 ▼4.69 ▼4.79 ▼5.19
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.29 ▼4.35 ▼4.49
Median 5.89 4.69 4.79 4.85

Last updated: 21 September 2018 11:16am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com