About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, December 12th, 11:30PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Bank targets 'put customer interests at risk'

The only way to remove conflicts of interest in banking is to stop vertically integrated organisations making and selling their own products, one adviser boss says.

Tuesday, June 26th 2018, 6:00AM 4 Comments

by Susan Edmunds

First Union has released new data from a survey of its members, which showed that 87% of staff felt pressure to sell financial products.

More than 90% said the pressure they were under was the same or greater than a year ago, despite banks pledging to respond to Australia's Sedgwick Report and alter their incentive structures. 

Union organiser Stephen Parry said banks’ attempts to balance sales targets with softer, non-sales factors, had been ineffective.

He said while ANZ and Westpac had moved away from having set dollar amounts of product categories that staff had to sell, they were still working towards a target number of overall sales.

Many bank staff were required to use an in-house system that prompted them on which products, such as insurance, might be a good fit to sell to each customer.

He said the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Bill could have some benefit because it makes clear that customer interests should come first.

“Having such a general proposition in legislation isn’t necessarily going to flow through to actual change on the ground.”

The new law will require that staff aren’t remunerated in a way that encourages them not to give priority to client interests.

There had been minimal response to the FMA conduct guide, he said.

He said banks needed to remove sales targets as a way of measuring staff performance. “It creates fundamental conflict between consumer and bank.”

Conflict within vertically integrated organisations is something that has been of concern to unaligned financial advisers in recent years.

Some have suggested that the new regime does not go far enough to address the issues that arise when advisers are employed by a product provider.

Rod Severn, chief executive of the PAA, said work was needed to stop bank customers from thinking they were getting advice, when all they were getting was a sales pitch or information on a bank product.

It was also important to stop the staff from being financially incentivised to sell bank product.

"This puts undue and unwanted pressure on bank staff to pressure customers into buying product that might not be well suited to them. The whole issue here is one of conflict. VIOs should not be allowed to manufacture and sell their own products, hence the banks looking to exit the wealth management sector due to this very problem.”

Tags: banks vertical integration

« AML laws 'waste of time, money'FMA: Gloves are off on AML »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 26 June 2018 at 6:38 am Murray Weatherston said:
I can't believe the last sentence in this direct quote (speech marks) by Rod Severn in this his last effective week in the job.
I have never in the long journey of regulatory reform seen the PAA arguing that banks and other VIOs should not be allowed to manufacture and sell their own product.
It's beyond belief!
I don't think any of the other adviser associations would support that view. I know SIFA would not.
At the same time I have never heard PAA advocate so clearly for a clear separation between sales and advice; tis a pity they hadn't supported the SIFA view much earlier which readers will recognise has been to stop the illusion of what the VIOs do most of the time which is to sell their own products under the cloak or disguise of advice. I always thought they were on the other side.
On 26 June 2018 at 8:22 am BGW said:
Murray, I think what we're seeing is the inevitable result of poorly conceptualised and drafted legislation back in 2008. Bringing sales and product providers into an advisory regime was always going to result in conflict and chaos, particularly when you introduce 3rd party commission into the mix (which I believe is such an anathema for someone in the role of an advisor). Until that conceptual mistake is addressed at a fundamental level it’s going to get a lot worse for all concerned.
On 26 June 2018 at 5:53 pm Murray Weatherston said:
A colleague who has to remain nameless emailed me a couple of questions.
Rod surely doesn't believe
1. that banks shouldn't be able to manufacture and sell their own loans; or
2. Insurance companies shouldn't be able both to manufacture and to sell their own insurance policies?

Or does he?
On 29 June 2018 at 10:17 am Davet said:
I had a client who was more or less forced to not take out a comprehensive insurance plan with myself in the course of negotiation with his bank for a new mortgage. At the last minute they threatened to withdraw his "special fixed rate for his mortgage" if he did not take out his life and mortgage cover with them. To make matters worse the client was told when he objected, "look don't worry you can go and see your Adviser a month or two after the mortgage is drawn and he can replace your cover!" Clearly an incentive at staff level driving this behaviour, and none of it in the clients best interest clearly!

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • ASB appoints Vanguard as manager
    “What I find amusing from those industry participants who favour passive investing over active is their continued ignorance...”
    8 hours ago by Pragmatic
  • Law doesn't have to be broken for FMA to take action
    “Agree with Brent Sheather - NZ regulators suffer from what is formally termed 'regulatory capture'. A form of government...”
    14 hours ago by Chatterbox
  • ASB appoints Vanguard as manager
    “Pragmatic just going back 20 years to speak to you, I suspect the ASB’s value proposition is well diversified low cost...”
    14 hours ago by John Milner
  • CLU back on agenda for Massey
    “I'm delighted Massey has elected to do this. The initial efforts of Denis Sampson and others bringing it here from the US...”
    16 hours ago by Referee
  • Old approach won't always stack up
    “Thanks Steve for a thoughtful and moderate comment. I know Brian and the fact was that the client was happy. For the...”
    17 hours ago by MediCare
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.55 4.79 4.99
ANZ Special - 4.05 4.29 4.49
ASB Bank 5.80 4.44 4.69 4.89
ASB Bank Special - 3.95 4.29 4.49
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.10 4.29 4.49
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.69 4.79 4.99
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 5.20 5.25 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.70 4.85 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.80 4.69 4.79 4.79
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.99 4.19 4.69
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - 3.79 - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.80 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.80 4.55 4.69 4.99
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.80 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.05 4.29 4.49
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.89 4.85 5.05 4.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 4.19 3.95 4.49
Sovereign 5.90 4.45 4.69 4.89
Sovereign Special - 3.95 4.29 4.49
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.75 4.10 4.35 4.49
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.75 4.60 4.85 4.99
TSB Bank 5.80 4.45 4.69 4.99
TSB Special - 3.95 4.19 4.49
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.95 4.69 4.79 5.19
Westpac - Offset 5.95 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.15 4.29 4.59
Median 5.89 4.50 4.69 4.79

Last updated: 2 December 2018 8:39pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com