About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, November 18th, 7:42PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Intensification plans in disarray

Withdrawal of Auckland Council’s proposed Unitary Plan zoning maps could have terrible consequences for the city, warn housing commentators.

Thursday, February 25th 2016, 12:00AM

by Miriam Bell

Property investor & developer David Whitburn

After a marathon extra-ordinary meeting yesterday, Auckland councillors voted 13-8 to withdraw the “out of scope” zoning changes proposed in Unitary Plan maps released in December.

The zoning maps would have up-zoned parts of the eastern and central Auckland suburbs, as well as parts of South Auckland, to allow for more townhouses and apartments to be built.

More than 75% of the city would have been limited to two storeys, in the large lot, single house and mixed housing suburban zones.

However, the proposals were met with vehement opposition from some – particularly residents of the affected eastern suburbs.

While the council’s decision to withdraw the “out of scope” zoning changes has been welcomed by some, many are dismayed by the turn of events.

Economist and housing commentator Shamubeel Eaqub has slammed the council’s decision.

In polite terms, the outcome was near-sighted and “gutless” at best and was driven by the fact it is an election year, he said.

“Councillors signalled they are against the densification and progress that Auckland desperately needs.”

He said the landed gentry – who are not representative of most of Auckland or New Zealand - have won and Auckland will suffer as a result.

“Despite some claims to the contrary, there is a generational aspect to the issue.

“The sight of old people jeering as young people talked about the lack of affordable housing was unpleasant.”

In his view, yesterday’s outcome will result in more high quality submissions, pushing for further densification, to the Independent Hearing Panel hearings in March.

“Will they be too little too late though? I am very worried that the outcome of the Unitary Plan will be far less densification than is needed, especially in areas where there is the infrastructure to support it.”

Proponents of the withdrawal of the “out of scope” zoning changes have said they were motivated by a lack of due process and the desire for natural justice.

Prominent Auckland property investor David Whitburn said the council had been naughty in the way they tried to introduce the “out of scope” changes into the Unitary Plan.

Proper consultation on those proposals should have been conducted and, as it hadn’t been, it was reasonable that the “out of scope” changes were withdrawn, he said.

However, he sympathises with the council’s desire for the greater intensification of Auckland.

“Given the population projections for Auckland, we are going to fall far short of the housing required without more intensification. It is necessary.

“We are not talking massive high-rises here. We are mainly talking terraced housing and there are quality requirements and design standards to control it.”

Opponents needed to think long-term, not short-term, Whitburn said.

“They need to think about the future housing needs of their children or, even more, their grandchildren.”

The council’s decision means the proposed “out of scope” zoning changes which were not supported by submission will be withdrawn.

But there is some confusion about what this might ultimately mean for the future Unitary Plan.

Building and Housing minister Nick Smith has pointed out that the final decision on the shape of the Unitary Plan will come down to the Independent Hearings Panel.

He also said there would be many other submitters to the Panel – including Housing New Zealand which wants much more intensification than the council.

The Panel will be conducting hearings on the Unitary Plan in March and April. It is then expected to recommend a final version of the Unitary Plan in July.

The council then has 20 working days to vote on the Unitary Plan and, last week, Smith told the council that it must have the Unitary Plan in place before October’s elections.

An Auckland Council spokesperson said the council is currently examining the implications of yesterday's resolutions and an update will be provided to councillors and the public in the coming days.

« Homes selling faster in regions No let-up in migration flow »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    8 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    8 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    13 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    1 day ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 4.05 3.95 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.55 3.45 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - ▼3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.04 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 15 November 2019 4:16pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com