About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, November 18th, 7:42PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Expect negative impact from regulation overload

Too much heavy handed tenancy regulation will lead to a drop in the supply of rental property and make renting harder for tenants, the NZ Property Investors Federation says.

Wednesday, August 23rd 2017, 1:00PM 1 Comment

by Miriam Bell

The NZPIF was responding to a new report from tenant advocacy groups Renters United and Action Station which paints a dire picture of rental conditions and calls for major changes to the industry.

Based on stories from around 610 tenants, the report comes to some damning conclusions about cold, damp properties, lack of insulation and tenant rights.

It then goes on to recommend some sweeping changes. These include recommendations that:

• all rental properties should have to pass a mandatory warrant of fitness (WOF);
• no-fault evictions – and letting fees – should be abolished;
• all landlords and property managers should be licensed;
• the Tenancy Tribunal be changed to give more power to renters; and
• a commission for housing be established.

However, the NZPIF believes that if the recommendations were introduced they would cause more harm for the tenants they represent than good.

NZPIF executive officer Andrew King said the system can’t be altered to be in favour of tenants at the expense of landlords because people will simply stop renting properties out.

“The supply of rental properties will go down and that will mean a reduction in choice and higher prices for tenants.”

In New Zealand, the bulk of rental properties are provided by private landlords.

But the spectre of ever increasing rules and regulations for landlords is already prompting some private rental property owners to get out of the industry, King said.

“For most landlords, it is already a marginal investment to provide a rental home for tenants.

“It is naive for tenant advocates to call for such one sided changes without understanding that it will make it harder for tenants to find and afford rental property.”

A number of the issues touched on by recommendations in the report, such as rental property WOFs and more “secure” tenancies, have been generating heat in the public arena for some time.

King reiterated that the NZPIF supports the minimum standards for rental property introduced last year as it is a practical piece of legislation which balances efficacy of insulation against cost.

But he said it is necessary to look at all the other factors at play when it comes to healthy homes and properties not being heated and ventilated properly, which comes down to tenants, are a significant part of the problem and would not be covered by a WOF.

When it comes to more “secure” tenancies, he said most landlords prefer longer term tenancies, but their introduction must be balanced.

“Having tenants take permanent control of a property without any benefit or allowance to the owner would see many rental properties removed from the market – which would not be good for tenants.”

Further, requiring that rental properties only be sold with the tenancy in place would impact on a landlord’s right to sell their own property, King said.

“Forcing rental property providers to only sell to other rental property providers would take away two thirds of potential home owner buyers, thereby reducing the achievable price they could expect to obtain.”

He added that the NZPIF finds it curious that tenants would feel powerless to discuss problems with landlords over fears they'll be moved on.

“Tenants are legally entitled to have their rental home maintained by their landlord and failure to do this is unlawful and the Tenancy Tribunal can award $3,000 to be paid to the tenant by the landlord.”

“If a tenant makes a request to fix something that they are entitled to have fixed, and the landlord ‘moves them on’ this is called retaliatory action and the Tribunal can award the tenant $4,000 to be paid by the landlord.”

Landlords do not end the tenancies of tenants without good reason, he said.

“The above mentioned fines for retaliatory action mean that a landlord evicting a tenant for asking to have maintenance issues taken care of would be taking an extremely large risk.”

Read more:

NZPIF opposes Wellington rental WOF 

Dark clouds on landlords’ horizon 

Insulation, heating improvement needed 

« NZPIF opposes Wellington rental WOF Human rights body slams tenant damage changes »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 24 August 2017 at 3:07 pm jpaynter said:
I have given up actively seeking residential tenancy properties for the reasons NZPIF list. The risk (tenant damage, P, non-payments) are not just worth the return. I created two tenancies by relocating dwellings to a piece of land and would do more but council regulations and the RMA etc make this harder. I am now focusing on Commercial property where the agreements are based on leases, not on what Tenancy Adjudicators decide. The returns are better and the tenants pay the OPEX (rates, insurance, water, repairs and maintenance, Body Corporate etc).
More and more regulations e.g. smoke alarms, insulation (I have already provided these where possibly but am now doing the undefloor) and residential WOF are increasing costs and compliance.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    8 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    8 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    13 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    1 day ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 4.05 3.95 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.55 3.45 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - ▼3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.04 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 15 November 2019 4:16pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com