tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Measuring adviser wellbeing       TAKE PART IN THE SURVEY Dismiss
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, September 21st, 10:35PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Methamphetamine use doesn’t mean eviction

A landlord who wanted to evict a tenant because of possible methamphetamine use by two flatmates has been slapped down by the Tenancy Tribunal.

Wednesday, May 12th 2021, 6:33AM 4 Comments

The tenant’s two flatmates had been arrested at the premises in December last year by police citing firearms and drugs offences.

Although the tenant was at the flat, he was not involved nor was he arrested. He was then given a 14-day notice by the landlord to evict the two flatmates. This was done.

A composite methamphetamine test immediately arranged by the landlord confirmed the presence of the drug. No detailed test was carried out.

However, the landlord applied to the tribunal to evict the tenant on the grounds the breach of the tenancy agreement was incapable of remedy.

He claimed the tenant used the premises unlawfully, by using or allowing another person to use methamphetamine on the property.

The tribunal found there was no legal requirement to apply the New Zealand Standard for Testing and Decontamination of Methamphetamine Contaminated Properties in the landlord’s case for eviction of the tenant.

Arguing the tenant left the premises unsafe was a challenge for the landlord, said the tribunal, as the residues evidenced by the composite test did not prove it more than likely there were excesses above the level adopted as safe.

“The residue itself is an unseen chemical, not that dissimilar to other possible residual contaminants like nicotine or chemicals from harsh cleaning products.”

The tribunal cited Professor Sir Peter Gluckman’s 2018 report determining there was little evidence supporting health risks from exposure to residue from methamphetamine consumption.

His report says in the absence of other evidence of manufacture, any levels below 15μg/100cm² are highly unlikely to present adverse effects therefore there should be no need for remediation.

Recent decisions from the tribunal have found, based on the Gluckman report, landlords have been unable to prove methamphetamine contamination below 15μg/100cm² poses a health risk and therefore amounts to damage.

In its decision, the tribunal says it did not find the tenant intentionally permitted the premises to be used unlawfully.

“He responded to the 14-day notice to remove the offenders and he was absent at work for much of the time, making it reasonably possible he was unaware of the activities of the others until the police involvement. It would be inequitable to make an order terminating the tenancy.”

The tribunal ordered costs incurred in having the composite test done be paid by the tenant.

Tags: Tenancy Tribunal tenants

« Persistent failure to lodge bonds: First ever court caseEviction notice oversteps tenants’ rights – results in damages »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 12 May 2021 at 9:39 am Peter Lewis said:
Yet, back in 2016, the benchmark level was set at 0.5 micrograms of methamphetamine per 100 sq.cm of surface area. This was based on the guidelines for the remediation of methamphetamine laboratory sites as published in 2010 and was being applied to all contamination sites.
Should the contamination be assessed as above benchmark levels then remedial action had to be taken. The landlord could not rent out a property that is contaminated. If they did so they were breaching their obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 as well as in other legislation such as the Building Act and the Health Act. Landlords were penalized, and in some cases ordered to pay compensation for furniture that tenants were ‘forced’ to destroy because of that contamination.
How things have changed in five years!
On 12 May 2021 at 10:46 pm Kevin Edmunds said:
No problem if contamination is below 15. Mind you this is not in keeping with the NZ Standard. The Government provided rules for the GG to provide a rule but the GG has not done so and so the result is a defacto standard due to the Gluckman report. Gluckmans report was a literature search so over time literature may view this differently but as soon as the Minister of Housing said Housing NZ would adopt this the Tribunal decided it would also adopt it despite there being a legitimate rule in NZ Standards at 1.5.
On 31 May 2021 at 12:57 am Peter Hall said:
I believe it is more complicated as OSH regulations reference the NZ standard so it would be breaking the OSH rules to allow a contractor or employee [ i.e. plumber or Property Manager] to enter a property with more than 0.5 micrograms per 100 sq.cm of meth contamination. I don't know if OSH has prosecuted but certainly a Contractor or Employee would have the right to know and or complain to OSH if they were exposed to Meth levels above 0.5 /100 sq.cm. I think Housing NZ get around this by just not testing, but that's not really much of a defense against a potential OSH prosecution for a Private Landlord.
On 1 June 2021 at 4:27 am paul murch said:
so the nearly $30K I had to spend to decontaminate a property with a Level of 13ug, didn't need to happen?

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA 4.55 ▲2.85 ▲3.25 3.55
ANZ 4.44 ▲3.20 ▲3.59 ▲4.00
ANZ Blueprint to Build 1.68 - - -
ANZ Special - ▲2.60 ▲2.99 ▲3.40
ASB Back My Build 1.79 - - -
ASB Bank 4.45 ▲2.85 ▲3.25 3.55
Basecorp Finance 5.49 - - -
Bluestone 3.49 3.34 2.99 3.34
BNZ - Classic - ▲2.85 ▲3.25 ▲3.55
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.15 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 4.60 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 4.55 ▲3.45 ▲3.85 ▲4.15
BNZ - TotalMoney 4.55 - - -
CFML Loans 4.95 - - -
China Construction Bank 4.49 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 2.65 2.65 2.80
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.65 3.95 3.85 -
Credit Union South 5.65 3.95 3.85 -
First Credit Union Special 5.85 2.95 3.45 -
Heartland Bank - Online 2.25 1.85 2.35 2.65
Heretaunga Building Society 4.99 3.80 3.90 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier 4.49 2.19 2.45 2.69
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - 2.25 - -
ICBC 3.69 2.35 2.75 3.05
Kainga Ora 4.43 2.88 3.28 3.59
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - 2.25 - -
Kiwibank 3.75 3.50 3.74 4.34
Kiwibank - Offset 3.75 - - -
Kiwibank Special 3.75 2.65 2.89 3.49
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Nelson Building Society 4.95 2.99 3.24 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Essential 4.79 - - -
Resimac 3.39 2.98 2.79 3.29
SBS Bank 4.54 2.99 3.39 3.59
SBS Bank Special - 2.49 2.89 3.09
Select Home Loans 3.49 3.34 2.99 3.34
The Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 2.35 - -
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 4.40 2.55 2.95 3.39
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 4.40 3.05 3.45 3.89
TSB Bank 5.34 3.35 ▲3.75 ▲4.05
TSB Special 4.54 2.55 ▲2.95 ▲3.25
Wairarapa Building Society 4.99 3.55 3.49 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac 4.59 ▲3.45 ▲3.85 4.09
Westpac - Offset 4.59 - - -
Westpac Special - ▲2.85 ▲3.25 3.49
Median 4.54 2.92 3.25 3.49

Last updated: 20 September 2021 8:55am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com