tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, June 29th, 1:39PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Fund managers seek clarity on FMA’s expectations on fees and commissions

Fund managers are beginning to stick their heads over the parapet in the wake of the release last week of the FMA’s Valuer for Money report into KiwiSaver and managed fund fees.

Tuesday, May 24th 2022, 6:06AM 7 Comments

by Jenni McManus

Scathing in tone, the report takes aim at what the FMA calls the non-transparent bundling of trail commissions into the management fees and is highly critical of fund managers’ use of “inappropriate” market indices as performance measures.

The report also says that for investors, the value of fund managers’ competence is undermined by “the drag of fees”.

Not surprisingly, the industry is hitting back though individuals and firms are still unwilling to be identified.

Three issues stand out: the aggressive tone and language of the report which for many indicates a breakdown in the relationship between the regulator and the industry; the need to put trail commissions “in context”; and the problem with performance fees (“why don’t they crack down on something everyone agrees is bullshit?”).

For one manager, putting trails for KiwiSaver funds “in context” would see the FMA also turning the blowtorch on similar (but eye-wateringly higher) commissions for life insurance (230% upfront and 20% per year on an ongoing basis, according to one manager) and mortgage brokers (60-80 basis points upfront).

While there is a legal requirement for KiwiSaver commissions to be “reasonable”, some managers believe the regulator has picked on the least profitable part of the industry, which doesn’t make a lot of sense.

“We know there’s an advice deficit [but] we know the numbers are small when you look at what the same advisers are earning on life insurance and mortgages,” one said.

The FMA should at least clarify its rules and expectations, he says. Others aren’t sure what, if any, levers the FMA can pull to bring them into line.

Said one: “The more critical question is ‘what is the problem that the FMA is trying to solve?’ What is broken about the funds management industry which needs to be fixed?”

In spite of the focus on fees, by comparison with Australia KiwiSaver fees were “not inappropriate”, this manager says. On average, KiwiSaver fees are lower than those charged on MySuper – Australia’s cheapest default option for investors.

Despite the FMA’s concern, many say they already split out trail commissions when calculating management fees. And anyone new entering the industry is required to comply with the regulator’s Value of Money guidelines which require this transparency. Performance fees are a much bigger issue than trail commissions, they say.

Another market player takes issue with the FMA’s contention that fees undermine a manager’s competence. “If a manager is extremely competent and charges high-than-average fees, why should that undermine competence?

“Surely, in a competitive open market with significant consumer choice of style and fee structures, consumers will vote with their feet if the competence of their managers is undermined by the fee they charge?”

On the question of inappropriate performance benchmarks, one suggests if the FMA is unhappy, it should set benchmarks for KiwiSaver funds.

“There may well be specific instances where more appropriate indices could be used. However, the FMA already has the power to regulate this issue. The question is why hasn’t it done so?”

According to this firm, bundling trail commissions is a “traditional practice,” not only in New Zealand “but throughout most of the world”.  And while they might be bundled, trails must be disclosed to investors by advisers through the Advisers’ Disclosure Statement.

In general, investors (particularly those with less to invest) are averse to paying advice fees but want and need advice. Bundling effectively provides a pay-as-you-go mechanism, this manager says.

Others say it is valid for the FMA to try to ensure advisers receiving trail commissions for their clients’ investments are actually providing that advice but removing the commissions will lead to the unintended consequence of removing access to advice for most investors. There are strong evidence supporting that view just across the Tasman, they say.

“The risk of imposing a one-size-fits-all approach to the provision of advice is that it adds huge costs to the industry and there is no evidence it will improve investors’ outcomes.”

Another unintended consequence might be consolidation of the industry as fund managers and advisers realise they need to merge in order to deal with the increased regulatory burden coming their way.

Morningstar, in its most recent Global Investment Experience report on fees and expenses, released on 30 March this year, puts New Zealand in the ‘average’ category.

It notes that funds without loads or trail commissions are widely available in the New Zealand market and domestic asset-weighted fees are “broadly competitive”.

Morningstar also says the lack of sales loads or commissions means advisers find it hard to provide advice to the KiwiSaver sector as 80% of that market is controlled by the banks.

But Morningstar also commented on funds being allowed to charge asymmetrical performance fees, meaning additional fees can be charged for outperformance but there is no corresponding reduction for underperformance. And it mentions the use of inappropriate benchmarks as hurdle rates in performance measurement.

“Large performance fee earnings, which reflect market movements rather than manager skill, have been evidenced in recent years,” Morningstar says. In relation to fees and expenses, the New Zealand market has decline since its last report.

Australia, however, is one of three markets to receive Morningstar’s top rating, along with the USA and the Netherlands. Australia’s ongoing fund fees are “typically unbundled”, Morningstar said, with an “investor-friendly approach to initial charges and ongoing commissions”.

Tags: FMA

« [The Wrap] Three things we learnt from the FMA Value for Money reportGovernment needs to better fund FMA: Industry »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 24 May 2022 at 2:06 pm John Milner said:
I once posed the question of the possible correlation between low remuneration for KiwiSaver and low to no touch advice from advisers. This was publicly put to a previous CE of the FMA at a IFSO conference at question time.
He suggested a client could wait until 65 years of age, then upon withdrawing their funds, visit a financial adviser and pay the commercial rate for good, sound advice.
I think at that point I left and had a drink.
On 24 May 2022 at 3:31 pm Pragmatic said:
Whilst I don't necessarily agree with the payment of commissions, the ongoing debate is really a red-herring for the true debate - which is disclosure. As long as the consumer is aware of what they are paying (ie: both in a percentage & dollar term), then the actual payment mechanism (ie: fees, commissions or otherwise) is largely irrelevant.

As for the tone of the FMA report - I suspect that the author will be embarrassed that this highly subjective and emotional report has been released to represent the philosophy of the Regulator.
On 24 May 2022 at 11:06 pm Murray Weatherston said:
@pragmatic
Its not only the author, its the CEO and the whole Board who should also be embarrassed by the tone and stance.
On 25 May 2022 at 6:46 am Pragmatic said:
Yep - fair point Murray
On 30 May 2022 at 6:10 pm LNF said:
@John Milner - sir 10 out of 10
On 31 May 2022 at 8:44 am dcwhyte said:
@Pragmatic - the entire debate around adviser remuneration is a red herring. It's how the adviser behaves towards the client's needs that determines suitable conduct - including, of course, full disclosure.

Some product providers choose to spend millions on advertising, others allocate expenses to fees/commissions to advisers - but both represent the cost of acquiring business.

Focus should be on which expense offers the consumer best chance of receiving impartial advice which properly addresses their needs.
On 6 June 2022 at 7:45 pm Graeme33 said:
The embarrasement for me as KIWISAVER Grows , and mortgage lending to some degree also is how much money the banks are now making in this country .Its far too much. If my Bank gives all the investment to Blackrock on some passive arrangement I want the FMA to help push my fees 40% lower Their tone is very appropriate .Graeme Adams

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA 5.95 4.85 5.35 5.65
ANZ 5.94 5.95 6.40 6.59
ANZ Blueprint to Build - - - -
ANZ Special - 5.35 5.80 5.99
ASB Bank 5.85 ▲5.35 ▲5.80 ▲5.99
Avanti Finance 5.95 - - -
Basecorp Finance 6.95 - - -
Bluestone 5.89 7.49 8.09 8.19
BNZ - Classic - 5.35 5.69 5.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.94 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.94 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.94 5.95 6.29 6.59
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.94 - - -
CFML Loans 6.45 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 5.40 6.14 6.40
China Construction Bank Special - 4.45 5.19 5.45
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - 4.75 - -
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.85 4.85 5.35 5.65
Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.85 5.35 5.85 6.15
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
First Credit Union Special 5.85 ▲5.35 ▲5.85 -
Heartland Bank - Online 4.10 ▲4.90 ▲5.29 ▲5.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Heretaunga Building Society 6.10 ▲5.35 ▲5.80 -
HSBC Premier 5.89 4.39 5.15 5.39
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.25 4.39 5.09 5.45
Kainga Ora 5.43 4.57 5.58 5.85
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Kiwibank 5.50 ▲6.19 ▲6.69 ▲6.79
Kiwibank - Offset 5.50 - - -
Kiwibank Special 5.00 ▲5.19 ▲5.69 ▲5.89
Liberty 4.84 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Nelson Building Society 6.45 5.55 6.15 -
Pepper Money 4.49 - - -
Resimac 6.19 5.60 6.16 6.29
SBS Bank 5.79 5.05 5.69 5.89
SBS Bank Special - 4.55 5.19 5.39
Select Home Loans 4.09 4.29 4.86 5.09
TSB Bank ▲6.30 ▲5.65 5.79 ▲6.45
TSB Special ▲5.50 ▲4.85 4.99 ▲5.65
Unity 5.65 4.95 5.55 -
Wairarapa Building Society 5.74 4.95 5.75 -
Westpac 5.94 ▲5.95 ▲6.29 ▲6.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac - Offset 5.94 - - -
Westpac Special - ▲5.35 ▲5.69 ▲5.99
Median 5.87 5.35 5.72 5.99

Last updated: 29 June 2022 9:23am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com