About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, October 21st, 10:08PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Editorial: Time for some honest questions

Two of the scary things about what's going on in superannuation are the near total lack of debate on such an important issue, and where there is debate, the quality of it.

Wednesday, May 9th 2001, 10:23PM

Two of the scary things about what's going on in superannuation are the near total lack of debate on such an important issue, and where there is debate, the quality of it.

As we have said before superannuation is one of the biggest issues facing this country because of the sheer cost of the public pension system and the low levels of personal savings (and in many cases the quality).

What's more the Government's proposal to partially pre-fund New Zealand Superannuation is one of the most important and far-reaching fiscal policies of this administration. Assuming pre-funding is put in place the first thing the Government will do each year is siphon $2 billion of tax revenues into its super savings fund.

What's particularly galling about the debate is how various interest groups talk about "compulsory superannuation" and the need for individual accounts.

The evidence used to support the calls for compulsory savings scheme are usually linked to a bland, unexplained question in a survey which goes something like this: "Do you support a compulsory savings scheme?"

The problem with these surveys is that there is absolutely no definition of what such a scheme is. One could argue we already have a compulsory scheme as we all have to pay taxes, and some of that revenue is used to pay NZ Super.

Maybe a compulsory scheme means something like they have in Australia where money is deducted at source by employers and put into individual employees' accounts?

Maybe it is a scheme like the Winston Peters' inspired Retirement Savings Scheme that was comprehensively defeated in a referendum?

All of these are very different, yet they are all arguably compulsory savings.

Anyone who trots out the argument promoting superannuation based on a meaningless question, is being disingenuous to say the least.

The other misleading argument is one that was trotted out by Act leader Richard Prebble at the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee last week.

The argument is that a poll done by Act shows that most people want their savings in individual accounts.

As with the compulsory question dealt with earlier this research, if you can call it that, is highly questionable. According to Prebble the sample used was 2000 Act party members in Auckland (do they have that many?), plus 2500 other people.

Hardly a representative sample of the population considering that Act struggles to reach 5% support in the political opinion polls, yet its membership makes up nearly 50% of the survey's sample.

What's more important about the issue is that the survey is patently designed as a gimmick to push Act's desire for NZ Super to be put into individual accounts.

Where this get interesting is that that option is already available.

To explain. National (according to its recent policy paper on super) is very close to Labour on the issue. Both parties agree support the three tiered system of super, that is a state pension (NZ Super), workplace superannuation and voluntary savings.

While National's paper (which isn't official policy) doesn't support pre-funding it does endorse the state pension.

Both parties also support tier two which is workplace savings, and they support tier three which is voluntary provision for retirement. That means they support the broad status quo.

Tier one is hardly ever likely to be privatised and put into individual accounts. However, tiers two and three are both individual accounts.

Considering that tier one is only meant to provide sufficient money for the absolute basics of life, then everyone should be saving on their own account.

If a Government puts tier one savings into individual accounts, then why don't they do the same for health and education? Simply because it's a daft idea.

« Irish Government Appoints Investment Adviser For National Pension FundAMP & Good Returns launch superannuation website »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Commission questions to be asked
    “I feel that all risk commission/bonuses payable should be disclosed in dollar terms, and in the event of replacement business...”
    23 hours ago by macca
  • Commission questions to be asked
    “The commissions in Australia on personal risk insurance are around 115% of initial premium- already well below NZ levels....”
    1 day ago by Mike Naylor
  • Commission questions to be asked
    “Like most things that are considered, the consumer reaction is unlikely to be taken into account. It’s less about fees...”
    1 day ago by Pragmatic
  • FAA review 'starting with a blank slate'
    “It is quite critical that legislators etc have some knowledge of investment theory before they legislate. For example Mr...”
    2 days ago by Brent Sheather
  • Don't discount small caps: Gaynor
    “Brian is quite correct. Also PIE funds is, and remains, a brilliantly successful manager. Massive return from a specialty. If...”
    6 days ago by NormanStacey
Subscribe Now

News and information about KiwiSaver

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AMP Home Loans 7.24 ▼5.69 6.39 6.65
AMP Home Loans $200k+ 7.14 ▼5.59 6.29 6.55
AMP Home Loans LVR <80% - - ▲5.99 ▼6.19
ANZ 6.74 6.15 ▼6.39 6.49
ANZ Special - ▼5.69 ▼5.75 6.09
ASB Bank 6.75 6.09 6.40 6.65
ASB Bank Special - 5.70 ▼5.75 6.19
BankDirect 6.75 6.09 6.99 6.65
BankDirect Special - 5.70 ▼5.75 6.19
BNZ - Classic - - ▼5.75 6.19
BNZ - GlobalPlus 6.74 ▼5.89 6.39 6.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Mortgage One 7.15 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 6.74 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 6.74 ▼5.89 6.39 6.59
BNZ - TotalMoney 6.74 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.45 6.05 6.20 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 5.75 - - -
eMortgage 6.04 6.15 6.69 7.19
Finance Direct 6.10 6.45 6.69 7.10
First Credit Union 6.45 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
General Finance 5.95 6.25 6.50 7.10
HBS Bank 6.65 5.85 5.99 6.19
HBS Special - - - 5.89
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heretaunga Building Society 6.70 6.00 6.50 -
Housing NZ Corp 6.74 5.99 6.39 6.59
HSBC Premier 6.84 5.95 5.95 6.39
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - 5.75 5.75 5.75
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 6.75 5.99 6.39 -
Kiwibank 6.65 5.79 6.39 6.65
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kiwibank - Capped 5.65 6.50 - -
Kiwibank - Offset 6.55 - - -
Kiwibank LVR > 80% - - 5.89 6.19
Liberty - - - -
Napier Building Society 5.80 6.00 6.70 -
Nelson Building Society 6.95 6.15 6.60 -
NZ Home Loans 6.85 6.09 6.40 6.65
Perpetual Trust 7.70 - - -
Resimac 6.59 6.35 6.58 6.77
SBS Bank 6.65 5.85 5.99 6.19
SBS Bank Special - - - 5.89
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Silver Fern 5.95 6.10 6.55 7.05
Sovereign 6.85 6.09 6.40 6.65
Sovereign Special - 5.70 5.75 6.19
The Co-operative Bank 6.70 ▼5.70 ▼5.89 6.19
TSB Bank 6.74 5.95 6.19 6.30
TSB Special - - 5.79 -
Wairarapa Building Society 6.20 5.75 5.95 -
Westpac 6.59 6.09 6.39 6.65
Westpac - Capped rates - 6.74 6.99 -
Westpac - Offset 6.59 - - -
Westpac Special - - ▼5.75 6.19
Median 6.70 6.00 6.39 6.52

Last updated: 22 October 2014 7:07am

News Quiz

In a study of performance fees by Pathfinder, how many of the 10 equity PIE funds reviewed have to achieve a margin over and above their benchmark before performance fees kick in?

10

9

7

5

2

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by PHP Developer and eyelovedesign.com