About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   depositrates.co.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, March 27th, 11:10AM
Latest Headlines

Budget blowout makes funding super difficult: English

National Finance spokesman says if the Government can't keep within its self-imposed spending cap this year, what hope is there that it can put $2 billion a year into a super fund?

Monday, May 21st 2001, 10:05PM

by Bill English

This week’s Budget will again highlight the plans of Finance Minister Michael Cullen to partially prefund superannuation – and it will also highlight some of our major reservations with it.

The lead up to the Budget has been dominated by Dr Cullen’s admission that he would not be able to keep to his $5.9 billion spending cap.

This is despite many comments over the past 12 months recommitting to the cap and tying his credibility to it. From the 19 December 2000 Budget Policy Statement: "To achieve all our objectives, we will need to maintain spending within the $5.9 billion three-year spending limit that was agreed in Budget 2000."

The breach of the cap has set a dangerous precedent. The Government is saying it’s a small breach – so why didn’t they just find the savings to cover it and keep their fiscal credibility intact?

In fact it is a large proportion of the $1200m they will spend in the next two years. More importantly the Government has demonstrated that as soon as the going gets tough, fiscal discipline and targets will get thrown out the window.

Remember Dr Cullen is expecting political parties to sign up to superannuation prefunding plan that will impose huge fiscal constraints on future Governments.

Dr Cullen’s plan requires future Governments to put aside an average $2 billion a year for the next 25 years. It is designed to guarantee the current level of superannuation for the next 100 years, and at its peak subsidises the pension by a modest 14%.

Dr Cullen has shown in Year One that Labour has trouble controlling its spending. Higher than expected tax revenue will keep him on track this year, but that won’t last 25 years.

The pressure to spend more can only grow from here. Inside the Left there is growing impatience with Government’s inability to do more for people on low or middle incomes. Funding pressures in health and education are intensifying as hospitals take cuts in their budgets and universities threaten to increase student fees.

Current forecasts from the Treasury show structural surpluses are expected to get bigger and bigger every year. But those surpluses are predicated on two things – that the Government will be able to keep to its spending plan, and that economic growth and government revenues will pan out as expected.

We expect the surpluses will come under pressure from both sides – spending pressures mean Dr Cullen will blow his $6.1 billion spending cap next year. At the moment the only person who thinks they’ll stick to the new cap is Dr Cullen.

At the same time, we believe forecast rates of nominal GDP growth are optimistic, meaning revenues aren’t likely to be as robust as currently forecast.

Such pressures will come to a head quite quickly. In the DEFU, the Treasury forecast average nominal GDP growth of 5% per annum, helped along by high nominal growth in 2000, the bulk of which is actually due to inflation. To highlight the sensitivities, if you drop this back to 4%, which is what National averaged in the 1990’s, this would have a cumulative negative effect of $1920 million on the 2004 operating balance.

This would result in a $1700 million surplus in the year Dr Cullen has to find $1800 million to feed his super fund. And that makes no allowance for any further expenditure slippage!

Our concerns are being borne out by at least one private sector commentator who is expecting surpluses of only $1400 million in 2004, leaving a $400 million shortfall if correct.

So the Super Fund is yet to get off the ground and the doubts about its robustness and credibility are already starting to intensify. These doubts are just beginning to surface in the Labour Party and the Council of Trade Unions as they realise it’s not a free lunch. They have to pay a political price – defending health cuts and rising student fees.

The funds being put aside for the Super Fund have alternative uses – debt repayment (in the short term), increased spending, or tax cuts. It’s only now that the pressure is on that those alternatives are being highlighted.

The pressure will be strong in Dr Cullen’s own party and strongest amongst his coalition partners – especially when they go into negotiations around the election year Budget facing an electorate grumpy over failed expectations, a business sector that’s still wondering whether the charm offensive is anything more than spin, and health and education sectors under severe financial strain.

Bill English is the National Party's finance spokesperson

Bill English is the deputy leader of National and the party's spokesman on finance and superannuation.

« Cullen refines ethical investmentsAMP & Good Returns launch superannuation website »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “So let me get this right. To be a true insurance adviser I should have an agency with every insurance company (that is if...”
    21 hours ago by Robalan
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “Those with a legal bent will lick their lips, rub their hands and go "ohboyohboyohbioy" when surveying the feedback document....”
    2 days ago by Denis
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “We know that you can't turn a sows ear into a purse, the whole debate about the lipstick is irrelevant. Regulate what...”
    2 days ago by RiskAdviser
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “mbie/fma FAR vs advisers' choice. let's toss the coin and see which is better - head i win, tail you lose. ...”
    3 days ago by w k
  • MBIE: Tell us what's better than FAR
    “A+ to Dirty Harry above; I couldn't agree more. At the risk of boring you other contributors with repetition - FGS STOP...”
    3 days ago by Murray Weatherston
Subscribe Now

News and information about KiwiSaver

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.79 4.89 5.29 5.49
ANZ Special - 4.49 4.79 -
ASB Bank 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
ASB Bank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BankDirect 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
BankDirect Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.50 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.95 - - -
BNZ - Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.90 4.99 5.19 5.49
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.90 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 6.70 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.95 4.99 5.25 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heretaunga Building Society ▲5.75 ▲5.00 ▲5.20 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.65 ▲4.89 5.19 5.49
HSBC Premier 5.59 4.19 4.39 4.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.70 4.59 4.69 5.09
Kiwibank 5.55 4.99 5.19 5.65
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.55 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 4.59 4.79 5.25
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 5.10 5.45 -
NZ Home Loans 5.80 4.99 5.19 5.49
NZ Home Loans - Specials - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
NZ Home Loans - Specials - 4.59 4.79 5.09
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.94 5.30
SBS Bank 5.65 4.99 5.19 5.49
SBS Bank Special - ▲4.59 ▲4.79 5.25
Sovereign 5.90 4.99 5.19 5.49
Sovereign Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.65 4.59 4.85 5.25
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.65 5.09 5.35 5.75
TSB Bank 5.65 4.80 5.15 5.45
TSB Special - 4.55 4.75 5.15
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac 5.75 4.99 5.19 5.49
Westpac - Capped rates - 5.15 5.25 -
Westpac - Offset 5.75 - - -
Westpac Special - 4.59 4.79 5.09
Median 5.79 4.88 5.17 5.38

Last updated: 24 March 2017 9:44am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com