tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, December 5th, 7:44PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

IFA seeks exemption from training requirements

Institute of Financial Advisers (IFA) is seeking an exemption for its members who already meet or exceed proposed regulations released by the Code Committee on advisers' ongoing professional training.

Thursday, February 18th 2010, 7:31AM 4 Comments

In a submission to the Code Committee, IFA president Lyn McMorran says it fully supports the requirement for all financial advisers to undertake robust and ongoing professional development throughout their career.  This ensures advisers are capable of providing timely and relevant advice to their clients, for example how proposed tax changes might change their financial circumstances.

IFA also submitted that it is more appropriate for advisers to undergo professional development as opposed to "training".  Development is more self-directed and relevant to the adviser's needs and encompasses a much wider range of learning media than just "training" which can often be taken for the sake of making up hours rather than because it has direct relevance to an adviser's development needs.

IFA members are required already to undertake 60 hours of professional development over a two year period, more than the minimum 20 hours a year currently proposed by the Code Committee.

"IFA members already comply with a robust Continuing Professional Development programme which clearly exceeds the training recommendations made by the Code Committee," McMorran says. "So we feel advisers who belong to a professional body that has an efficient professional development programme with its own internal processes for auditing should not also be required to have their hours audited by external auditors." 

In the proposed legislation, the Code Committee proposes all AFAs complete a minimum of 20 hours of continuing professional training each year. The first year is the 12 month period commencing from the date of an AFA's initial authorisation by the Securities Commission.

Hours can be spread across ‘Unstructured' and ‘Structured' Learning. Structured Learning includes any training that forms part of a tertiary qualification or is provided by any recognised financial services industry body or professional organisation, like IFA.

Unstructured Learning means any other training relevant to the provision of financial adviser services that falls outside of the scope of Structured Learning which may include any informal training such as employer provided seminars and workshops, self-led reading and research, participation in product launches and presentations and adviser mentoring and training.

The Code has recommended a split between 12 hours of structured and 8 hours of non-structured training per year to qualify as an AFA.

Tags: regulation

« Pitch to tie advisers to QFEs inevitable say IFA, SIFASIFA considers its future in new environment »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 18 February 2010 at 9:38 am Independent Observer said:
....It seems as though the Regulatory Agency is setting the rules... remind me why the industry requires the IFA.
On 18 February 2010 at 1:19 pm Noraini Ibrahim said:
I fully support the Code recommendation a split of two parts are wise and practical.
On 19 February 2010 at 9:05 am Robert said:
Yeah - good luck with that!

On 19 February 2010 at 10:01 am Majella said:
I recall the "grandfathering" of old. Huh! I have almost 20 years in the business and am undertaking the "Fast Track" course to a Challenge Test. I've learned some, and importantly RE-learned much. I believe everyone should be required to demonstrate their competency now - an even playing field - regardless of how much experience one has.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “@Backstage, thanks. I agree there is no relationship to CoFI, though, from a service perspective, I have two other providers...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Partners Life has decided to stop using its COM for advisers as it believes the system may breach the CoFI regulations which...”
    3 days ago by Amused
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Insurance companies should stick to their lane. They are not advisers and even those that employ advisers should not be crossing...”
    3 days ago by Tash
  • [GRTV] The nitty gritty of Smart’s ETFs
    “Advisors should consider all gateways into investment markets including cheaply priced ETFs to provide access to low priced...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • DRS member or not - client care remains advisers’ responsibility
    “FAPs are members of DRS too. Substitute “adviser” for “FAP” and the story is actually a lot more accurate. If...”
    4 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com