About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, October 19th, 2:47PM
rss
Latest Headlines

FMA warns on AML, won't name and shame

Twelve reporting entities, including advisers and advice firms, have been handed formal warnings for breaches of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) laws.

Wednesday, February 8th 2017, 11:20AM

by Susan Edmunds

The FMA requested risk assessment and AML audits from 77 reporting entities (REs), just under 10% of the REs that the FMA supervises, by November 25 last year.

Selection of those required to submit information was partly based on factors including the previous late filing of an AML/CFT annual report and those REs who, for the last two years in a row, said they had not carried out an AML/CFT audit report.

Twelve reporting entities were found to be non-compliant with the law. Nine reporting entities failed to provide their audit, two did not respond to the FMA’s request while one did not submit an AML/CFT annual report as legally required.



The Act requires a reporting entity to ensure its risk assessment and AML/CFT programme are audited every two years or at any other time at the request of the relevant AML/CFT supervisor.

Liam Mason, director of regulation at the FMA, said: “The regulatory regime to tackle money laundering and the financing of terrorism has been in place for more than three years. Firms and individuals have now had sufficient time to meet the legal requirements, as we stated in our recent monitoring report. We have taken proportionate action to ensure all reporting entities are clear about their obligations under the law.”

Independent audits are an essential component of complying with the Act and help ensure that reporting entities have robust systems and processes in place to detect and deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

The names of the twelve companies and individuals have not been published. The FMA said all were either small businesses or individuals and to do so would have a disproportionate effect. 

It said, of the nine entities who failed to provide an audit, all were now taking steps to become compliant.

The FMA will take further steps against the two reporting entities who didn’t respond to its requests and the single reporting entity that failed to provide its annual AML/CFT report.

Tags: AML FMA

« Client-first may be too big an ask for biggest playersFARs - where's the accountability? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Should lawyers give financial advice?
    “A further thought. In the section “What do lawyers think” I can see it is ok for a lawyer to tell someone to put their...”
    9 hours ago by Brent Sheather
  • Should lawyers give financial advice?
    “Good article. I have seen lots of instances where lawyers and accountants give financial advice and whilst most of it is...”
    9 hours ago by Brent Sheather
  • Should lawyers give financial advice?
    “your answer to "should financial advisers give legal or tax advice" should give you some idea if lawyers should give financial...”
    10 hours ago by w k
  • Leverage up your KiwiSaver fund
    “I liked the idea and I was in Booster's geared growth KiwiSaver. But its fees are 3x more than comparable funds, yet the...”
    3 days ago by RanDerson
  • KiwiSaver fees: Paying for performance
    “ANZ just don’t give up do they….actually not surprising as there is little downside to fake news in the NZ finance scene....”
    6 days ago by Brent Sheather
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com