tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, December 6th, 9:36AM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Financial adviser legislation threatens NZ’s reputation: Chapman Tripp

Law firm Chapman Tripp is warning that legislation to regulate the financial services industry may inadvertently damage the country's international reputation by preventing corporate entities from providing financial advice here.

Thursday, April 8th 2010, 8:20AM 3 Comments

by Paul McBeth

The government bill and subsequent supplementary order paper do not currently address the problems in the Financial Advisers Act and Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act that will prevent corporate entities from providing financial advice, according to Chapman Tripp partner Tim Williams. Apart from a few limited exceptions, the Act currently says that financial advice has to be provided by individuals in New Zealand. This has already raised concerns with large international financial advisers who advise institutional superannuation funds here, who are not about to shed their corporate structure.

"The second major problem with the legislation is its very wide scope. On its face, it appears to be aimed at financial advisers and financial planners but it has gone far broader than that, and applies to anyone giving financial advice, including advice as part of a business on buying a property," Williams told Good Returns. "While valuers and real estate agents are exempt, builders, electricians, architects and engineers who advise in their technical field on a house or a building which is for sale are not. Surely it isn't intended they sit financial adviser exams."

"Hopefully these and other deficiencies will be fixed," he said.

Williams said he is confident Parliament's Commerce Committee will appropriately consider Chapman Tripp's concerns, and said he understands there has been some acknowledgement that the select committee will look at advice from wholesale advisers, which could extend to a reconsideration more generally of what advice corporates can give.

The law firm has made written submissions on the government's bill to amend the legislation, and is calling for changes to broaden the limited exception allowing organisations and their employees to make investment management decisions and give financial advice, grant exemptions for overseas advisers, provide more suitable tailored rules for wholesale advisers and managers and make provisions for one Qualifying Financial Entity to cover a group of related companies in respect to products issued by the group.

Williams said he raised concerns with the act when he spoke at the IFA Conference in July last year and even before then. When he initially questioned whether the prohibition on corporates providing financial advice was an unforeseen consequence, he was told by officials that it was intended.

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

Tags: regulation

« Regulation of advisers already increasing confidenceETITO releases assessment pricing for advisers »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 8 April 2010 at 9:31 am solomon said:
Why has it taken this long for the lights to go on
The current situation is almost akin to the patients taking over the asylum
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger,more complex and more violent.
It takes a touch of genius,and a lot of courage,to move in the opposite direction
Albert Einstein
On 8 April 2010 at 11:12 am BW said:
To AM Solomon... what makes you think the lights have yet gone on? This is just one of many alarm bells that submitters and commentators have been ringing for many months now. There is little liklihood of them being heard now if they haven't been heard before (particularly in the dark!).
On 11 April 2010 at 5:28 pm Spock said:
To AM
Agree
Q.
Will the 'patients' get their way through the likes of TT ? In my simple view the worry is they will.

The real Q.
Is there really any sign of intelligence out there,......... among the patients?
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “@Backstage, thanks. I agree there is no relationship to CoFI, though, from a service perspective, I have two other providers...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Partners Life has decided to stop using its COM for advisers as it believes the system may breach the CoFI regulations which...”
    3 days ago by Amused
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Insurance companies should stick to their lane. They are not advisers and even those that employ advisers should not be crossing...”
    3 days ago by Tash
  • [GRTV] The nitty gritty of Smart’s ETFs
    “Advisors should consider all gateways into investment markets including cheaply priced ETFs to provide access to low priced...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • DRS member or not - client care remains advisers’ responsibility
    “FAPs are members of DRS too. Substitute “adviser” for “FAP” and the story is actually a lot more accurate. If...”
    4 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com