About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, November 18th, 2:22PM
rss
Latest Headlines

Commerce Committee adopts QFE extension despite misgivings

Parliament's Commerce Committee has recommended the government adopt the proposed extensions to the qualifying financial entity (QFE) regime, despite chairman Lianne Dalziel last month voicing her misgivings about the regime.

Friday, June 11th 2010, 2:59PM

by Paul McBeth

The committee has recommended the government adopt change that would allow groups of firms to operate under the umbrella of a single QFE, so employees of that group could "provide advice under that umbrella without each entity requiring QFE status." During oral submissions in May, Dalziel said she had "very real doubts" about these extensions, saying "we shouldn't be moving away from what we want to protect." To help counter this, the committee supports assessing QFEs' "capacity to ensure adequate consumer protection outcomes take account" of the "robust internal procedures" the groups will have to have.

The report also recommends one company take a lead role in these umbrella groups, to help support the Securities Commission more effectively use its powers against a group when a breach occurred. The committee proposes two QFE groups be allowed to share some entities to provide additional flexibility, "provided control could be demonstrated effectively by both."

To help facilitate the group QFE model, the committee says employees or nominated representatives should be able to give advice on a product issued or promoted by another entity within the group, though it did not support allowing advisers to be nominated representatives of more than one QFE.

The changes will probably help keep a lid on the number of QFEs to be registered, after the Securities Commission predicted there could be as many as 200 such entities depending on the outcome of the committee's report.

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« Adviser Business Statements guide gets first airingSovereign warns its advisers against complacency »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    1 day ago by regant
  • FMA fesses up to website breach and apologises
    “@LNF I was specifically speaking to the word not the mandatory. So not misunderstanding, more a crack at the culture that...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@tash, as insane as it sounds, yes. The mishmash of rules around this basically say you both need to keep records of who...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “wow ..... looks like advisers have to watch out for booby traps. do clients need to have any responsibilities? who do...”
    3 days ago by w k
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com