tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Thursday, December 5th, 7:44PM

Blogs

rss
Latest Headlines

Who is going to get ANZ's $45 million?

Wednesday, June 23rd 2010, 9:05AM 1 Comment

by Philip Macalister

The ANZ settlement over how ING’s CDO-backed funds were sold brings some closure to the matter – but leaves questions and some lessons. Firstly investors never really like these sort of settlements. They interpret them as the company doing wrong and all but pleading guilty while they (the investors) don’t get the full benefit (including a scalp). To describe yesterday’s decision a “moral victory” rather than a financial one is pretty close to the mark, and all that could really be expected. The reality is that to take the case through the courts would be a long and costly process. No doubt there would be appeals and the matter would drag on and on. The commission claimed that many of the investors were elderly and couldn’t afford the time, so a settlement was a practical solution. The idea that there should be some sort of product recall and investors should get all their money back is still, I believe, an unrealistic option. As Commerce Minister Simon Power said yesterday (in announcing changes to securities laws) “The Government cannot and will not legislate for risk, but we can build a regime that makes those risks more transparent.” Investors knew there was some risk in these funds and they have to accept that. The bit that still remains unclear is whether this settlement is just for investors who put money into the funds via ANZ advisers, or whether it includes independent advisers (IFAs) as well? It seems to me that it relates to ANZ advisers (who accounted for just under 3000 of the 15,000 investors). In the past we have noted that there were concerns about how ANZ advisers sold these funds and that seems to have been acknowledged in the settlement. However there is little to discuss how IFAs sold the funds. I have, in the past, compared the ING funds to finance company collapses. This settlement shows two stark differences between the two types of investment. The first is with a comment the commission made. It said the settlement has been made as “unlike many other situations where investors have lost their savings, in this case ANZ has the financial ability to make substantial further payment to investors.” Investors in collapsed finance companies should take note. Maybe the lesson is only invest with companies which have the financial strength to put things right? The second is around intermediaries. All the ING product was sold through advisers (either ANZ or independent), however the majority of money which went into finance companies was put into their debentures directly by clients. By using intermediaries investors do get some comeback (particularly bank-aligned ones at the moment) and will get more protection once new regulations come into force. And of course the fundamental problem was no one really knew or understood how these funds worked and what would happen when markets changed. The lesson – or repeat of the sermon – don’t invest in things you don’t fully understand.
« How not to do itNo fairy tale ending »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 12 July 2010 at 7:08 pm Red Dog The Pirate Guy said:
I do not know one investor in the ING funds who knew the risks or had them explained to them.
This includes a lady in her 80's who ended up with $1.3 million of $1.8 million of investments,in the ING DY Fund,courtesy of her ANZ investment adviser,those funds having previously been held in their entirity in ANZ term deposits,to the widow who ended up with her family trust portfolio being 50% impaired after taking the advice of her lawyer who obtained a referral fee for sending her to an ING linked investment advisor,and her husband's estate being 100% impaired due to having 100% of its funds invested in ING,as were her own personal funds.

My experience of the NZ public investing in Finance Companies is 99.9% through Investment Advisors.
If the general public invested off their own back,then they need to accept the hit.If they invested through advisers,the advisers need to take the hit for not understanding what they were putting their lambs into.
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “@Backstage, thanks. I agree there is no relationship to CoFI, though, from a service perspective, I have two other providers...”
    2 days ago by JPHale
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Partners Life has decided to stop using its COM for advisers as it believes the system may breach the CoFI regulations which...”
    3 days ago by Amused
  • Partners kills its matrix
    “Insurance companies should stick to their lane. They are not advisers and even those that employ advisers should not be crossing...”
    3 days ago by Tash
  • [GRTV] The nitty gritty of Smart’s ETFs
    “Advisors should consider all gateways into investment markets including cheaply priced ETFs to provide access to low priced...”
    3 days ago by Pragmatic
  • DRS member or not - client care remains advisers’ responsibility
    “FAPs are members of DRS too. Substitute “adviser” for “FAP” and the story is actually a lot more accurate. If...”
    4 days ago by Aggressively_passive
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA - Back My Build 4.94 - - -
AIA - Go Home Loans 7.49 ▼5.79 ▼5.49 ▼5.59
ANZ 7.39 6.39 6.19 6.19
ANZ Blueprint to Build 7.39 - - -
ANZ Good Energy - - - 1.00
ANZ Special - 5.79 5.59 5.59
ASB Bank 7.39 ▼5.79 ▼5.49 ▼5.59
ASB Better Homes Top Up - - - 1.00
Avanti Finance ▼7.90 - - -
Basecorp Finance ▼8.35 - - -
BNZ - Classic - 5.99 5.69 5.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - Mortgage One 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 7.54 - - -
BNZ - Std 7.44 ▼5.79 ▼5.59 5.69
BNZ - TotalMoney 7.54 - - -
CFML 321 Loans 6.20 - - -
CFML Home Loans 6.45 - - -
CFML Prime Loans 8.25 - - -
CFML Standard Loans 9.20 - - -
China Construction Bank - 7.09 6.75 6.49
China Construction Bank Special - - - -
Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - ▼5.69 - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 6.95 ▼5.79 ▼5.59 5.69
Co-operative Bank - Standard 6.95 ▼6.29 ▼6.09 6.19
Credit Union Auckland 7.70 - - -
First Credit Union Special - ▼5.99 ▼5.89 -
First Credit Union Standard ▼7.69 ▼6.69 ▼6.39 -
Heartland Bank - Online ▼6.99 ▼5.49 ▼5.39 ▼5.45
Heartland Bank - Reverse Mortgage - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 8.60 6.65 6.40 -
ICBC 7.49 ▼5.79 ▼5.59 5.59
Kainga Ora 8.39 7.05 6.59 6.49
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Kiwibank 7.25 6.89 6.59 6.49
Kiwibank - Offset 7.25 - - -
Kiwibank Special 7.25 5.99 5.69 5.69
Liberty 8.59 8.69 8.79 8.94
Nelson Building Society ▼7.94 5.95 6.09 -
Pepper Money Advantage 10.49 - - -
Pepper Money Easy 8.69 - - -
Pepper Money Essential 8.29 - - -
SBS Bank ▼7.49 6.95 6.29 6.29
SBS Bank Special - 6.15 5.69 5.69
SBS Construction lending for FHB - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS FirstHome Combo ▼4.94 5.15 - -
SBS FirstHome Combo - - - -
SBS Unwind reverse equity 9.75 - - -
TSB Bank 8.19 6.49 ▼6.39 ▼6.39
TSB Special 7.39 5.69 ▼5.59 ▼5.59
Unity 7.64 5.99 5.69 -
Unity First Home Buyer special - 5.49 - -
Wairarapa Building Society 8.10 6.05 5.79 -
Westpac 7.39 6.39 6.09 6.19
Westpac Choices Everyday 7.49 - - -
Westpac Offset 7.39 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Westpac Special - 5.79 5.49 5.59
Median 7.49 5.99 5.79 5.69

Last updated: 5 December 2024 10:06am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com