About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, November 19th, 10:06AM
rss
Latest Headlines

Appeal Court sides with FSCL

Advisers could soon have another ombudsman to choose to work with.

Monday, March 12th 2018, 6:00AM 1 Comment

by Susan Edmunds

The Court of Appeal has directed the Chief Ombudsman to reconsider Financial Services Complaints Ltd’s request to use the word “ombudsman” as part of its name.

FSCL applied after the Insurance and Savings Ombudsman revealed its intention to rebrand as the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman.

The external disputes resolution service argued that it would give it gravitas and help it compete with IFSO and the other schemes, if it, too, could be an ombudsman.

The term "ombudsman" is restricted in New Zealand and those who use it must get approval from the Chief Ombudsman. Since 1991, only three have been approved, including the Insurance and Savings Ombudsman and the Banking Ombudsman.

FSCL's application was initially declined, and it took its case to the High Court.

But Justice Simon France said he was not persuaded that FSCL needed to use the term to establish itself as having the necessary qualities displayed by other schemes.

He said it had not been disadvantaged in any material way by its inability to call itself an ombudsman and pointed to concern about confusion as a result of IFSO and the Banking Ombudsman using the name.

The Court of Appeal has now overturned both those earlier decisions.

“If other similar schemes in the same sector as the applicant are already using the  name  ombudsman, it is difficult to understand how granting the application would increase confusion.  Indeed, there is a strong argument to the opposite effect," the court's judgment said.

"Arguably, it is more likely that what will increase confusion is treating very similar schemes in the same sector (including a scheme with part of the  same  name) differently. Yet that is the effect of denying consent in this case."

The court said the Chief Ombudsman was entitled to consider the impact of having a number of non-parliamentary ombudsmen. But in doing so, regard had to be given to the existing permissions in the marketplace and the need to treat applicants consistemently.

"There should not be a 'first mover' advantage."

The judgment also said that, while consumers have to use the dispute resolution scheme of their service provider, there was a public interest in consumers having confidence in the integrity of a scheme. 

"It is not unreasonable to suggest that consumer confidence in the integrity of Complaints Ltd’s scheme may be reduced by the  absence of the name ombudsman especially  when other similar schemes including one with a similar name are called ombudsman."

FSCL chief executive Susan Taylor said she was very pleased with the decision.

"We're now waiting to hear further from the Chief Ombudsman."

She said she had not been given any indication how long the process might take.

Tags: FSCL IFSO

« Pathfinder eyes carbon riskCode working group reveals proposals »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 12 March 2018 at 2:49 pm Murray Weatherston said:
Disclosure - my company is a member of FSCL
Someone forgot to proofread the judgment - FSCL is referred to as Complaints Ltd all through the judgment. Former Chief Ombudsperson (CO) was referred to as simply Dame Beverly.
But before FSCL breaks out the champagne, they should reflect that CA did not tell Current CO Judge Boshier to let FSCL use the title Ombudsman.
CA quashed earlier decisions and told CO to take a re-look at the application in the light of a few comments by CA Judges.
Surely it is within the wit of the CO to look through the new lens and come up with exactly the same decision as before, but with different reasons.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • When is a client really a client?
    “And this subtle upgrade to the understanding of a complaint. Which changes the ISO definition from an expression of dissatisfaction...”
    21 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Just released additional standards from the FMA. Record keeping potentially until 7 years after the death of the life...”
    21 hours ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “@ReganT interesting that the two life advisers involved with the code working group discussion are the ones being argued...”
    1 day ago by JPHale
  • When is a client really a client?
    “In a previous reply I responded to the concept of payment as a trigger. I actually agree it’s not. While we don’t often...”
    2 days ago by regant
  • When is a client really a client?
    “Tash are you being deliberately obtuse? I didnt say you have to keep sending/giving disclosure every year, I said you have...”
    2 days ago by regant
Subscribe Now

Weekly Wrap

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.19 4.05 3.95 4.49
ANZ Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
ASB Bank 5.20 4.05 3.95 4.39
ASB Bank Special - 3.55 3.45 3.89
BNZ - Classic - 3.55 3.45 3.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.90 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.35 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.30 4.45 4.35 4.55
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.30 - - -
China Construction Bank 5.50 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 3.19 3.19 3.19
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 3.99 4.49 -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.80 4.95 -
HSBC Premier 5.24 3.35 3.35 3.35
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 5.15 3.18 3.18 3.20
Kainga Ora 5.18 4.04 3.95 4.39
Kiwibank 5.80 ▼4.14 ▲4.30 4.64
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.15 - - -
Kiwibank Special - ▼3.39 ▲3.55 3.89
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 5.70 4.25 4.15 -
Pepper Money Near Prime 5.64 - 5.44 5.44
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Pepper Money Prime 5.18 - 4.98 4.98
Pepper Money Specialist 7.59 - 7.39 7.39
Resimac 4.50 4.86 3.89 3.94
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.29 4.85 5.05 5.49
SBS Bank Special - 3.55 3.39 3.89
Sovereign 5.30 4.15 4.29 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.65 3.75 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.15 3.49 3.59 3.89
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.15 3.99 4.09 4.39
TSB Bank 6.09 4.35 4.25 4.69
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
TSB Special 5.29 3.55 3.45 3.89
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.34 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 5.34 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.55 3.45 3.99
Median 5.34 4.04 4.09 4.39

Last updated: 15 November 2019 4:16pm

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%

MORE QUIZZES »

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com