About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds Other Sites:   tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz
Last Article Uploaded: Friday, July 19th, 2:20PM
Latest Headlines

COMMENT: Reforms would increase rental shortage

Feelings on tenancy law reform continue to run high as MBIE considers submissions on the Government’s proposals. Here’s a summary of what landlord Naveen Goel had to say in his…

Wednesday, October 31st 2018, 11:15AM 3 Comments

The proposed “reforms” to the Residential Tenancies Act are a gross violation of property rights and of the freedom to carry on a legitimate business.

In essence, the increased rights which would be given to tenants amount to giving control of the landlord’s property to the tenant and forcing the landlord to be subject to the whims of the tenant and the Tenancy Tribunal.

The key changes proposed are an end to the 90 day no cause termination; tenancies not terminable on a 42 day notice even on sale of a house; rent increases limited to one per year; and increasing penalties on landlords and making landlords subject to audits by MBIE.

All these changes essentially mean that tenancies would effectively be perpetual: once you get a tenant in, you won’t be able to get them out! The hard-earned money which landlords have put into rental housing would be put seriously at risk.

It seems the Government wants landlords to get out of the business and sell their rental properties in a fire sale - so as to bring property prices down in the hope that renters will be able to buy their own homes.

But the proposed changes ignore proven economic theory and empirical evidence from numerous other countries. This includes research by Nobel laureates like Gunnar Myrdal and Nobel laureate- Milton Freidman which finds that rent controls have a detrimental impact on the rental market, particularly on poorer tenants.

Respected economists have shown that rent control diverts new investment, which would otherwise have gone to rental housing, toward investments giving better returns. They have demonstrated that it reduces the quality and quantity of rental housing stock, discourages rental housing construction, and leads to less repairs and maintenance.

On top of this, landlords would try to increase rents, get more selective in their choice of tenants and, potentially, sell their rental houses - but not at distressed prices.

The foundation of the Government’s proposal is the BRANZ NZ Rental Sector Report 2017, which is based on a small sample size [1099 tenants, 406 landlords in phase 2 and 86 tenants, 48 landlords in phase 3]. It can by no means be considered representative as there are 2.5 times tenants as compared to landlords surveyed.

Yet, while this suggests a bias, the report concludes that “the tenants and landlords in this study generally reported, in both the CATI surveys and the follow-up interviews, reasonably satisfactory or good renting experiences”.

The irony is that besides making life difficult for landlords, the proposed reforms would only work to exacerbate the housing shortage. They would also make it much harder for lower quality tenants to obtain a rental in the first place.

The proposed measures would only succeed in the manner predicted by renowned Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck in his 1972 quote: “Rent control: the most efficient technique to destroy a city - except for bombing”.

Naveen Goel is a landlord and a lawyer. He made a submission on the Government’s proposed tenancy law reforms on behalf of himself and 62 other landlords.

Tags: housing market property investment RTA tenancy reform

« COMMENT: Have we hit the bottom?COMMENT: Landlording is a business »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 1 November 2018 at 10:07 am John Butt said:
Thanks for your Opinion piece, it led me to red the report, but I did not need to get far to see the bias evident. The report covers comments from tenants and landlords, which all seem to be fair and reasonable, but then summarises with highly emotive, and definitely not research based, opinion:
"To make renting a viable alternative to homeownership/owner-occupation requires a perceptual shift to viewing a dwelling as primarily ‘a home’, rather than predominantly ‘an asset’; and for this to be reflected in legislation which affords tenants secure occupancy.
Despite 42 % of the New Zealand population now living in rental accommodation, in the debates about the current housing ‘crisis’ little consideration is given to the struggles private renters face in today’s housing market."
On 1 November 2018 at 4:04 pm michaeljakob said:
Your comment John Butt ignores what has already been happening.
As a landlord I always provide a nice clean serviceable place for tenants to live. Of course when tenants leave most leave our place other than found so we have to restore to our level. Then there is the ongoing regulation to provide all the bells and whistles. We're now up to more insulation.
So now you want to place landlords in a place where they are servants of recalcitrant tenants in an ever increasing war of 'you owe me' so that the palace becomes a gold plated palace complete with servants. Add to that the almost impossibility of getting tenants out when a landlord's circumstances change and we have a situation where tenants can and will become intolerable tyrants with no financial risk of any sort.
Why would landlords have any interest in this sort of game? Personally I'll find a country where landlords are appreciated. It's not out fault there was a GFC nor is it my fault that the government invited offshore money into the property market in NZ.
The write of the above comment appears to be a bureaucrat who does not own rental property. Spruiking illogical nonsense may be what those who control the country do but they need to think carefully before they attack landlords and business people doing nothing other than trying to make a living whilst providing a necessary service. If they think rents are too high in NZ then they might like to look at Australia, Sydney in particular.
On 8 November 2018 at 7:43 am bothworlds said:
As ACT Party candidate Stephen Berry said recently at a Landlord/Tenant debate "You cannot revoke the Law of unexpected consequences" And you can bet your life on there being "unexpected" consequences should the reforms proposed by dullards, become law.

Sign In to add your comment



Printable version  


Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Thanks Murray. I wonder how many RFA's are considering becoming a sole trader FAP. MBIE is banking on none according to...”
    3 hours ago by MPT Heretic
  • Pathfinder-backed KiwiSaver to target gender diversity
    “This is a great initiative by Pathfinder - congratulations on taking a risk, and standing up for something that you believe...”
    1 day ago by Pragmatic
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “@all Put your cheque books away - no need to pay the lawyers to do the research to provide an opinion...... In my old...”
    2 days ago by Murray Weatherston
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “Further reading - Kinsington Swan in February 2018 https://www.kensingtonswan.com/news-updates-and-events/financial-advice-reforms-insights-series-14-penalties-enforcement-complaints-and-disciplinary-matters/...”
    2 days ago by all hat, no cattle
  • Call to ensure efficient advice licensing
    “MPT and Murray this might help https://www.fma.govt.nz/assets/Fact-sheets/Who-will-need-a-licence-to-provide-financial-advice...”
    2 days ago by all hat, no cattle
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ANZ 5.69 4.35 4.35 4.55
ANZ Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
ASB Bank 5.70 4.29 4.35 4.55
ASB Bank Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Classic - 3.85 3.85 4.05
BNZ - Mortgage One 6.40 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 5.85 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 5.80 4.69 4.59 4.79
BNZ - TotalMoney 5.80 - - -
Credit Union Auckland 5.95 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 6.15 4.95 4.95 -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Credit Union North 6.45 - - -
Credit Union South 6.45 - - -
Finance Direct - - - -
First Credit Union 5.85 - - -
Heartland 6.70 7.00 7.25 7.85
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 5.75 4.60 4.75 -
Housing NZ Corp 5.80 4.69 4.49 4.45
HSBC Premier 5.89 3.79 3.79 3.89
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
ICBC 5.65 3.85 3.95 3.89
Kiwibank 5.80 4.60 ▼4.60 ▼4.74
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset 5.65 - - -
Kiwibank Special - 3.85 ▼3.85 ▼3.99
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Napier Building Society - - - -
Nelson Building Society 6.10 ▼4.69 ▼4.79 -
Resimac 5.30 4.86 4.14 4.19
RESIMAC Special - - - -
SBS Bank 5.79 4.85 5.05 5.49
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank Special - 3.85 3.85 3.99
Sovereign 5.80 4.29 4.35 4.55
Sovereign Special - 3.89 3.85 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 5.65 3.89 3.89 4.05
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 5.65 4.39 4.39 4.55
TSB Bank 5.69 4.45 4.35 4.55
TSB Special - 3.95 3.85 4.05
Wairarapa Building Society 5.70 4.85 4.99 -
Westpac 5.79 4.69 4.79 5.19
Westpac - Offset 5.79 - - -
Westpac Special - 3.85 3.85 4.05
Median 5.80 4.35 4.35 4.19

Last updated: 19 July 2019 10:59am

News Quiz

The maximum remuneration model for Australian life insurance advisers is to be set at what?

Upfront 40% + trail 20%

Upfront 50% + trail 10%

Upfront 50% + trail 20%

Upfront 60% + trail 10%

Upfront 60% + trail 20%


About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com