tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Wednesday, July 15th, 6:05PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Rent arrears end tenancies in lockdown

The Covid-19 crisis saw the introduction of emergency rules which make it harder to terminate tenancies, but a recent Tenancy Tribunal ruling shows that racking up rental arrears can still mean the end of a tenancy.

Wednesday, May 20th 2020, 9:18AM 3 Comments

by Miriam Bell

At the beginning of lockdown the Government introduced measures to amend the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) and better protect tenants.

These measures include a provision which mean it is not possible to terminate tenancies during a period of three months around the lockdown, unless the parties agree or for one of a limited set of reasons.

Those reasons include substantial tenant damage to a property, assault or threats of assault from the tenant, anti-social behaviour, abandonment of the property, and being 60 days (up from 21 days) behind in the rent.

The new rules also specify that tenants who had previously been given notice could stay in their rental property if they needed to during the lock-down period.

When it came to rental arrears, if such a case made it to the Tenancy Tribunal, the Tribunal was tasked with considering fairness and whether the tenant is making reasonable efforts to pay the rent.

For landlords, there has been considerable concern around this particular provision as they feared tenants would stop paying rent – despite Housing Minister Megan Woods saying tenants must still pay rent.

These was also concern that Tribunal rulings around the emergency measures might favour tenants.

However, looking through recent Tribunal rulings it seems Tribunal adjudicators have largely been finding in favour of landlords in cases where there is 60 days of rent owing.

One recent Auckland case – which ended in a termination due to rental arrears during lockdown- is a good example of this.

Allan Tairua and Susan Felts-Mackay moved into a North Shore rental property, managed by North Shore Rentals Ltd, in February 2019.

Later in the year, the two stopped paying rent as they claimed there were defects in the premises, which the landlord did not remedy.

Tairua also claimed he had provided the property manager with a letter detailing the problems. However, he had not kept a copy of it and had no evidence of formally complaining to the landlord.

By the time, the landlord got a Tribunal hearing the country was still in level four of the lockdown and Tairua and Felts-Mackay owed $15,600 in rent.

Tribunal adjudicator, R Kee, found that the tenants were over 60 days in arrears and was not persuaded by the tenants’ claim that the property defects were so significant that the rent should be abated.

There was no documentary of photographic evidence of the problems, Kee noted. Further, the landlord was prepared to remedy any maintenance issues that were proven.

Kee also said the Tribunal had to consider other matters in considering whether the tenancy should be terminated.

“In relation to those further considerations, I find that the tenants are not making reasonable endeavours to pay the rent.

“The second factor [balancing the interests of the tenants and the landlord to see if a termination is not justified] is not reached. Therefore, there is no basis to refuse termination.”

For that reason, Kee ordered the tenancy be terminated and said the landlord’s application for rent arrears was established.

The tenants were ordered to pay North Shore Rentals Ltd $14,974.28 immediately, while the Bond Centre was ordered to pay the company $1,400.

Tags: compliance conduct coronavirus Covid-19 investment landlords property investment property management rental market rents Tenancy Tribunal tenants

« Rent increase freeze to change the marketCompliance statement deadline extended »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 20 May 2020 at 11:01 am gabrielle said:
As a landlord the problem is that they got to $15,600 in owed rent. I would be in serious trouble if a tenant did that to me. My conclusion is that the Tenancy Tribunal ruled in this case in favour of the landlord but it was a really extreme case. Will they ever see that money anyway?
On 20 May 2020 at 7:38 pm Denise D said:
I am a private landlord and have just recently been through a telephone Tribunal hearing which ruled in my favour to grant eviction. My tenant owed $6,000 (well over the 60 days) in arrears due to a series of circumstances out of his control which was why I let it go for some time. I never felt at any stage that the judge was favouring the tenant due to the whole covid 19 problem - or is this considered an extreme case too. I have now sorted a repayment plan with the ex tenant and wish him well. Without knowing the full story, my problem with hearing about the $15,000 arrears is how on earth did a rental management company, who works for and gets paid to look after the house and sort these issues for the house owner, ever let this go on for so long. I think I will stick to my own management.
On 20 May 2020 at 9:45 pm Peter L said:
The reality is that the landlord will get the bond and nothing else. they can go whistle for the $14k
Of course the landlord should have moved far quicker, as soon as the rent became overdue last year as it is an illegal act to withhold rent payments because of alleged defects within the property.
The Tribunal has long held that property defects and non-payment of rent are two entirely separate issues and rental payment cannot be withheld due to that reason.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA 4.55 3.19 3.19 3.49
AIA Special - 2.69 2.69 2.99
ANZ 4.44 3.15 3.25 3.39
ANZ Special - 2.55 2.69 2.79
ASB Bank 4.45 3.19 3.19 3.49
ASB Bank Special - 2.69 2.69 2.99
Bluestone ▼3.49 ▼3.49 ▼3.49 ▼3.49
BNZ - Classic - ▼2.55 2.69 2.99
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.15 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 4.60 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 4.55 3.25 3.29 3.59
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
BNZ - TotalMoney 4.55 - - -
China Construction Bank 4.49 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 2.65 2.65 2.80
Credit Union Auckland 5.45 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.65 4.75 4.75 -
Credit Union South 5.65 4.75 4.75 -
First Credit Union Special 5.85 3.35 3.85 -
Heartland 3.95 2.89 2.97 3.39
Heartland Bank - Online - - - -
Heretaunga Building Society 4.99 4.35 4.45 -
HSBC Premier 4.49 2.60 2.65 2.80
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 3.99 2.58 2.68 2.79
Kainga Ora 4.43 3.29 3.39 3.85
Kiwibank 3.40 3.40 3.54 4.00
Kiwibank - Capped - - - -
Kiwibank - Offset - - - -
Kiwibank Special 3.40 2.65 2.79 3.25
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Nelson Building Society 4.95 3.45 3.49 -
Pepper Essential 4.79 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
Resimac 3.49 3.45 3.39 3.69
SBS Bank 4.54 3.29 3.19 3.49
SBS Bank Special - 2.79 2.69 2.99
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 4.40 2.69 2.75 2.99
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 4.40 3.19 3.25 3.49
TSB Bank 5.34 3.35 3.49 3.79
TSB Special 4.54 2.55 2.69 2.99
Wairarapa Building Society 4.99 3.75 3.99 -
Westpac 4.59 4.15 4.09 4.49
Westpac - Offset 4.59 - - -
Westpac Special - ▼2.55 2.69 2.79
Median 4.55 3.19 3.22 3.39

Last updated: 13 July 2020 7:38am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com