tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Tuesday, October 27th, 8:08AM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

COMMENT: Property investment tax advantages

Public opinion has it that there’s lots of tax advantages with property investment. But property accountant Anthony Appleton-Tattersall* is asking people to let him know if they see any, as he hasn’t found them yet.

Thursday, October 15th 2020, 8:00AM 3 Comments

Anthony Appleton-Tattersall

Did you come here looking for details about the tax loopholes enjoyed by property investors?

It is common knowledge after all that property investors don’t pay tax, because of all the tax advantages enjoyed by the asset class.

But as is often the case with common knowledge, it’s also total baseless nonsense.

Residential property does get several specific sections in the Income Tax Act, but none provide advantages. They instead make it the worst-taxed investment class available except a term deposit.

In short, the tax regime in New Zealand is exceptionally harsh on residential property. But it remains a fantastic investment class due to friendly borrowing terms. In detail? Read on.

The property-tax-advantage rhetoric stems back decades. It was huge in the 1990s when advisors were touting negative-gearing schemes.

Borrowing to the hilt to buy as much as possible, generating losses each year and a corresponding tax refund – meanwhile, the property value rises faster than the annual losses, tax free.

So is the tax advantage the ability to negative-gear and get a refund for your losses? Not at all! Until very recently this could be done on any investment.

A business that makes a loss can offset this loss against other income. Your investment in shares or forestry or gold, if you’ve borrowed to buy it and makes a loss, you can get a refund as a result.

Note the words “until very recently”… Residential property has recently been singled out as the only class which you can’t deduct your losses and instead have to carry these forward.

An explicit tax disadvantage versus anywhere else you could put your money.

So then the tax advantage must be a lack of capital gains tax. It is true New Zealand does not have a capital gains tax; the only OECD country not to.

But this fact isn’t property-specific. Capital gains on shares, businesses, classic cars, art, jewellery, stamps, or your Pokemon card collection are all tax free too.

Unless of course you’re buying them specifically to sell, then that’s another matter – and it’s the same with property, those who regularly buy and sell are subject to tax and often GST too. All fair so far.

But property gets special treatment, where capital gain is explicitly deemed to be income and taxed accordingly. No other asset class is targeted in this way.

Subdivision tax law and association to a builder or developer are examples, but the most recent is also perhaps the most common and well known: The bright line test.

The bright line rule is an excellent concept. But it was poorly drafted into law, creating massive potential for tax liability outside of the desired scope of catching property speculation.

For many years, and still now, any property purchased with the intention to sell it (a “flip” or “trade” property) will have tax levied on any gain. There is no time restriction here, taxable forever.

But prior to 1 October 2015, it was far too easy for unscrupulous or ignorant people to buy and sell property for profit and fail to declare their income. And tough for the IRD to prove intention.

The new system for recording and reporting on property sales allows IRD to track and catch non-compliance far easier. This is a good thing.

I have several gripes with the bright line legislation, but my most significant one is a lack of exemption for related party sales. In what world is a restructure to your own trust, taxable speculation?

Then, there’s the unnecessary extension to five years. Two years already caught the speculators. Extending also creates a precedent for future increases. A capital gains tax by stealth – but only on houses.

The only asset classes more-disadvantaged are cash and term deposits. These do not experience value growth, so you’re taxed on the entire return – most of which is just meeting inflation.

Where property has clear and unfair advantage over other asset classes is the ability to cheaply leverage.

A mortgage at 80% is standard, and 85-95% entirely possible particularly for property purchased as a home and rented later. Lending is at the best available rates, presently around 2.5%.

Some banks lend for investment in shares (“margin lending”) but only to specific approved securities, with lending capped at 40-70%, and interest rates of 4-5%.

An unsecured loan to operate or grow a business tends to cost upwards of 10%.

Is it any wonder generations of Kiwis continue to gravitate to property?

*Anthony Appleton-Tattersall operates AAT Accounting Services (at www.aataccounting.co.nz), a specialist accounting firm for the property sector.

Tags: accountants building capital gains capital gains tax compliance developers housing market interest rates investment IRD Lending property investment tax

« COMMENT: Accessing commercial property assetsCOMMENT: Is a post-election market surge likely? »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 15 October 2020 at 11:09 am penny@darwin.nz said:
Thank you Anthony, the best concise explanation of property tax and investment advantages I have seen.
On 16 October 2020 at 11:20 am nakiboy99 said:
What a biased, one-sided diatribe. Prior to 2011 our tax laws, especially in regards to negative gearing, claiming depreciation on appreciating assets and the absence of ring fencing allowed landlords to plunder the NZ tax system at will. I was one of them but I certainly wouldn't have the audacity to complain now that the playing field has been levelled a little. The bright line test should be applied to any property you cannot prove you permanently occupied for at least 5 years.
On 25 October 2020 at 3:11 am Anthony Appleton-Tattersall said:
Response to Nakiboy99:
Please note, I didn't complain about the removal of depreciation on residential buildings. Though that's another target specifically for property. While I agree it's unlikely that a home loses value, it's by no means unheard of - and when that happens there is no deduction available. I can't think of another business with this disadvantage. Thank you for pointing this out!

But truly, I agree depreciation on buildings was a bit of a rort, that went on far too long. In much of the world, buildings depreciate. Over time they get tired, and eventually are no longer fit for purpose and are torn down and rebuilt. This value decrease should happen in New Zealand also, but through increased regulation and an inefficient duopoly in construction materials supply market, it costs more and more to build a new house, keeping the value of old homes moving upwards. Where there is no true depreciation, there should be no tax claim. But when the building is eventually sold at a profit the landlord has to pay all that money back anyway. It was never 'plundering', it was an interest-free loan. Still wrong in my opinion, but hardly the piracy you make it out to be.

If you had fully read the text above, you would see I have no problem with a level playing field. What I find appalling is the explicit tax disadvantages levied towards a specific business sector. If all losses were unable to be offset and had to be carried forward that wouldn't be great, but it's better than the rubbish residential ringfencing rules. I openly support a comprehensive capital gains tax - it would be great for the country long term. But a capital gains tax just on residential property is an abhorrent distortion.

Sign In to add your comment

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News
Most Commented On
Mortgage Rates Table

Full Rates Table | Compare Rates

Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
AIA 4.55 2.55 2.69 2.79
ANZ 4.44 3.15 3.25 3.39
ANZ Special - 2.55 2.69 2.79
ASB Bank 4.45 2.55 2.69 2.79
Bluestone 3.49 3.49 3.49 3.49
BNZ - Classic - 2.55 2.69 2.79
BNZ - Mortgage One 5.15 - - -
BNZ - Rapid Repay 4.60 - - -
BNZ - Std, FlyBuys 4.55 3.15 3.29 3.39
BNZ - TotalMoney 4.55 - - -
CFML Loans 4.95 - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
China Construction Bank 4.49 4.70 4.80 4.95
China Construction Bank Special - 2.65 2.65 2.80
Credit Union Auckland 5.45 - - -
Credit Union Baywide 5.65 3.95 3.85 -
Credit Union South 5.65 3.95 3.85 -
First Credit Union Special 5.85 2.95 3.45 -
Heartland 3.95 2.89 2.97 3.39
Heartland Bank - Online 2.95 1.99 2.35 2.45
Heretaunga Building Society 4.99 3.50 3.40 -
HSBC Premier 4.49 2.45 2.60 2.65
HSBC Premier LVR > 80% - - - -
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
HSBC Special - - - -
ICBC 3.69 2.45 2.65 2.79
Kainga Ora 4.43 2.93 3.07 3.24
Kainga Ora - First Home Buyer Special - 2.25 - -
Kiwibank 3.40 3.30 3.54 3.54
Kiwibank - Offset 3.40 - - -
Kiwibank Special 3.40 2.55 2.79 2.79
Liberty 5.69 - - -
Nelson Building Society 4.95 3.45 3.49 -
Pepper Essential 4.79 - - -
Resimac 3.39 3.35 2.99 3.35
Lender Flt 1yr 2yr 3yr
SBS Bank 4.54 3.05 2.99 2.99
SBS Bank Special - 2.55 2.49 2.49
The Co-operative Bank - First Home Special - - - -
The Co-operative Bank - Owner Occ 4.40 2.55 2.69 2.79
The Co-operative Bank - Standard 4.40 3.05 3.19 3.29
TSB Bank 5.34 3.29 3.45 3.59
TSB Special 4.54 2.49 2.65 2.79
Wairarapa Building Society 4.99 3.55 3.49 -
Westpac 4.59 ▼3.09 3.29 3.39
Westpac - Offset 4.59 - - -
Westpac Special - ▼2.49 2.69 2.79
Median 4.55 2.94 2.99 2.80

Last updated: 23 October 2020 5:00am

About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com